Building Simulation

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 183–188

A comparison of luminous efficacy models based on data from Vienna, Austria

Research Article / Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling

Abstract

To support building design in view of daylight quality, computational (simulation) tools can provide effective support. To perform detailed daylight analysis via simulation, appropriate sky models are needed. In the past, various sky luminance distribution models have been developed. Such models, however, require illuminance data for the relevant location. As measured external illuminance levels are not available for many locations, the more widely available irradiance measurements can be translated, using proper luminance efficacy functions, into illuminance values. The present paper compares five global luminous efficacy models based on a database of measured illuminance and irradiance data from Vienna, Austria. These models typically involve mathematical formulations with multiple coefficients, whose values are derived for a specific location. The results suggest that these models performed rather poorly, once tested against Vienna data. However, the models’ performance improved significantly, once the respective coefficients were modified (calibrated) using the Viennese database.

Keywords

daylight illuminance irradiance global luminous efficacy simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 references

  1. Dervishi S, Mahdavi A (2010). A simple method for the derivation of illuminance values from radiance data. In: Proceedings of BauSim 2010-Building Performance Simulation in a Changing Environment (pp. 495–498), Vienna University of Technology, Austria.Google Scholar
  2. Littlefair PJ (1988). Measurements of the luminous efficacy of daylight. Lighting Research and Technology, 20: 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aydinli S, Krochman J (1983). Data on daylight and solar radiation. Draft for CIE TC, 4,2.Google Scholar
  4. Chung TM (1992). A study of luminous efficacy of daylight in Hong Kong. Energy and Buildings, 19: 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Robledo L, Soler A (2000). Luminous efficacy of global solar radiation for clear skies. Energy Conversion and Management, 41: 1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Robledo L, Soler A, Ruiz E (2001). Luminous efficacy of global solar radiation on a horizontal surface for overcast and intermediate skies. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 69:123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Perez R, Ineichen P, Seals R, Michalsky J, Stewart R (1990). Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy, 44: 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Munner T, Kinghorn D (1997). Luminous efficacy of solar irradiance: improved models. Lighting Research and Technology, 29: 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ruiz E, Soler A, Robledo L (2001). Assessments of Muneer’s Luminous Efficacy Models in Madrid and a proposal for new models based on his approach. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 123: 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mahdavi A, Dervishi S (2010). An empirically-based global luminous efficacy model for Vienna, Austria. Internal Report. Department of Building Physics and Building Ecology. Vienna University of Technology, Austria, 2010.Google Scholar
  11. MATLAB (2010). MATLAB Release 2010a, The MathWorks, Inc., http://www.mathworks.com.
  12. Reindl DT, Beckam WA, Duffie JA (1990). Diffuse raction correlations. Solar Energy, 45: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahdavi A, Dervishi S, Spasojevic B (2006). Computational derivation of incident irradiance on building facades based on measured global horizontal irradiance data. In: Koenigsdorff R, van Treeck C (eds), Energieeffizienz Gebäuden und Behaglichkeit in Räumen, BauSIM2006 (IBPSA) (pp. 135–137). München: Eigenverlag TU München.Google Scholar
  14. Zavodnikova K (2010). Derivation of diffuse irradiance based on measured global irradiance data. MSc thesis, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna. Austria.Google Scholar
  15. Kasten F (1993). Discussion on the relative air mass. Light Research Technology, 25: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wright J, Perez R, Michalsky JJ (1989). Luminous efficacy of direct irradiance: variations with insolation and moisture conditions. Solar Energy, 42: 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Building Physics and Building EcologyVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations