Advertisement

A Comparative Prospective Study of Laparoscopic and Open-Mesh Repair for Ventral Hernia

  • K. S. V. N. Surya Prakash
  • Ramesh Dumbre
  • Deepak PhalguneEmail author
Original Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Comparisons between laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) and open ventral hernia repair(OVHR) outcomes have previously been published in multicentre trials, randomized control studies, cross-sectional analysis, and meta-analysis. There was significant heterogeneity among some trials. Hence, an attempt was made in the present study to compare the outcome of patients undergoing open and laparoscopic mesh repair for ventral hernia. Seventy patients aged 18 to 64 years having ventral abdominal hernia admitted in Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, between February 2015 and March 2016 for hernia surgery and ready to participate in this study were included. Statistical significance of difference of categorical variables was tested using chi-square test whereas independent sample t test was used for parametric data. Non-parametric data were tested using Mann-Whitney U test. Mean visual analogue scale score was significantly higher in OVHR group as compared to LVHR group, 4.37 and 3.63 at 24 h (p = 0.001), 2.74 and 2.17 at 48 h (p = 0.005), and 2.33 and 1.88 at 72 h (p = 0.003), respectively. Median duration of hospital stay was significantly higher (p = 0.003) in OVHR group (4 days) as compared to LVHR group (3 days). There was no statistically significant difference in post-operative complications (Clavian-Dindo Classification) at 3 months between the two groups. LVHR is better option for ventral hernia repair than OVHR.

Keywords

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair Open ventral hernia repair VAS score Duration of hospital stay 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Malangoni MA (2012) Hernias. In: Courtney M, Townsend J (eds) Sabiston Text book of Surgery, 19th edn. Elsevier, Canada, pp 1114–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ecker BL, Kuo LE, Simmons KD, Fischer JP, Morris JB, Kelz RR (2016) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: longitudinal outcomes and cost analysis using statewide claims data. Surg Endosc 30(3):906–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barbaros U, Asoglu O, Seven R, Erbil Y, Dinccag A, Deveci U et al (2007) The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11(1):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carbajo M, Del Olmo JM, Blanco J, De la Cuesta C, Toledano M, Martin F et al (1999) Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh. Surg Endosc 13(3):250–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Froylich D, Segal M, Weinstein A, Hatib K, Shiloni E, Hazzan D (2016) Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in obese patients: a long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 30(2):670–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Misra M, Bansal V, Kulkarni M, Pawar D (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 20(12):1839–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Navarra G, Musolino C, De Marco ML, Bartolotta M, Barbera A, Centorrino T (2007) Retromuscular sutured incisional hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial to compare open and laparoscopic approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(2):86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olmi S, Magnone S, Erba L, Bertolini A, Croce E (2005) Results of laparoscopic versus open abdominal and incisional hernia repair. JSLS. 9(2):189–195PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woerlee G (1998) ASA—physical status classification. Common Perioperative Problems and the Anaesthetist. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 5–6Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harvey MM (1995) Intuitive biostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ (2001) Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 8(12):1153–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Itani KM, Hur K, Kim LT, Anthony T, Berger DH, Reda D et al (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 145(4):322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qadri SJF, Khan M, Wani SN, Nazir SS, Rather A (2010) Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair using polypropylene mesh-a comparative single centre study. Int J Surg 8(6):479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3(1):1–60Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sajid MS, Bokhari SA, Mallick AS, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 197(1):64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    DeMaria E, Moss J, Sugerman H (2000) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Surg Endosc 14(4):326–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raftopoulos I, Vanuno D, Khorsand J, Kouraklis G, Lasky P (2003) Comparison of open and laparoscopic prosthetic repair of large ventral hernias. JSLS 7(3):227–232PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olmi S, Scaini A, Cesana G, Erba L, Croce E (2007) Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair. Surgical endoscopy 21(4):555–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salvilla SA, Thusu S, Panesar SS (2012) Analysing the benefits of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open repair: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Minim Access Surg 8(4):111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Costanza MJ, Heniford BT, Arca MJ, Mayes JT, Gagner M (1998) Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias. Am Surg 64(12):1121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Toy F, Bailey R, Carey S, Chappuis C, Gagner M, Josephs L et al (1998) Prospective, multicenter study of laparoscopic ventral hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 12(7):955–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanders LM, Flint LM, Ferrara JJ (1999) Initial experience with laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Am J Surg 177(3):227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kannan K, Ng C, Ravintharan T (2004) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: local experience. Singap Med J 45:271–275Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Asencio F, Aguiló J, Peiró S, Carbó J, Ferri R, Caro F et al (2009) Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 23(7):1441–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martorana G, Carlucci M, Alia C, Barrianco G, Iacopinelli S, Labruzzo C et al (2006) Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: our experience and review of the literature. Chir Ital 59(5):671–677Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Reines HD, DeMaria EJ, Newsome HH, Lowry JW (1996) Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg 171(1):80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee Y, Iqbal A, Vitamvas M, McBride C, Thompson J, Oleynikov D (2008) Is it safe to perform laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh in elderly patients? Hernia 12(3):239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of SurgeryPoona Hospital & Research CentrePuneIndia
  2. 2.Dept. of Surgery and Consultant SurgeonPoona Hospital & Research CentrePuneIndia
  3. 3.Poona Hospital & Research ConsultantPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations