Risk Factors and Predictors of Poor Outcome Following Hepaticojejunostomy for Postcholecystecomy Bile Duct Injury
- 7 Downloads
Bilio-enteric anastomosis is the main line of treatment of bile duct injury (BDI). This study aims at exploring factors related to poor outcome after surgical reconstruction especially operative factors. Special emphasis on Hepp-Couinaud technique, theoretically, ensuring larger stoma and better blood supply. Between January 1992 and July 2015, 321 cases of postcholecystectomy BDI underwent hepaticojejunostomy. Retrospective analysis of demographics, perioperative data and management, and outcome according to Terblanche et al. Development of anastomotic strictures (AS) was evaluated. The mean follow-up time was 84.7 ± 61.9 months. Women represented 76% of all cases with a mean age of 40.1 ± 12.8. ERCP was performed in 105 (32.7%) patients. E2 and E3 strictures accounted for 76% of cases. One hundred thirty-seven (42.7%) patients underwent an end-to-side HJ. Abdominal collection or biloma was the commonest complication. Anastomotic stricture occurred in 16 (5.2%) patients after a mean time of 45 ± 31.3 months. Excellent or good outcome was detected in 281 (91.8%) patients, while fair or poor outcome was proved in 25 (8.2%) patients. On multivariate analysis, the only significant factors that predict a poor outcome were post-ERCP pancreatitis (p = 0.008), the design of HJ as end to side (p = 0.033), and postoperative biloma or abdominal collection (p = 0.021). On multivariate analysis, the only factor that was found to significantly affect the development of AS was postoperative development of collection or biloma (p = 0.032). HJ has very good results in specialized centers. Careful operative technique with sound wide stoma improves the outcome. ERCP should be used selectively and with caution for diagnosis of biliary strictures.
KeywordsBile duct injury Cholecystectomy Hepaticojejunostomy ERCP Biliary reconstruction
Design of the study: Ahmad M Sultan, Mohammed M Elshobary, and Waleed Askar
Data collection and statistical analysis: Ahmed Abdelrafee, Ahmad M Sultan, and Ayman El Nakeeb
Writing, editing, and reviewing: Ehab Atef, Helmy Ezzat, Mohamed Abdel Wahab, and Ahmad M Sultan
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This case series study was approved by local ethical committee of Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, code number: R/16.10.09.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 4.Ghazanfar S, Qureshi S, Leghari A, Taj MA, Niaz SK, Quraishy MS (2012) Endoscopic management of post operative bile duct injuries. J Pak Med Assoc 62:257–262Google Scholar
- 7.Pottakkat B, Vijayahari R, Prakash A, Singh RK, Behari A, Kumar A, Kapoor VK, Saxena R (2010) Factors predicting failure following high bilio-enteric anastomosis for post-cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1389–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1241-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Mercado MA, Franssen B, Dominguez I, Arriola-Cabrera JC, Ramirez-Del Val F, Elnecave-Olaiz A et al (2011) Transition from a low: to a high-volume centre for bile duct repair: changes in technique and improved outcome. HPB (Oxford) 13:767–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00356.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Zyromski NJ, Butler JR (2016) Management of Postoperative Bile Duct Stricture. In: Millis JM, Matthews JB (eds) Difficult decisions in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: an evidence-based approach. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 241–252Google Scholar
- 10.AbdelRafee A, El-Shobari M, Askar W, Sultan AM, El Nakeeb A (2015) Long-term follow-up of 120 patients after hepaticojejunostomy for treatment of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 18:205–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Terblanche J, Worthley CS, Spence RA, Krige JE (1990) High or low hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct strictures? Surgery 108:828–834Google Scholar
- 17.Keleman AM, Imagawa DK, Findeiss L, Hanna MH, Tan VH, Katz MH, Goodwin SC, Lane JS, Vajgrt D, Nguyen T, Smith CW (2011) Associated vascular injury in patients with bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Am Surg 77:1330–1333Google Scholar
- 21.Perera MT, Monaco A, Silva MA, Bramhall SR, Mayer AD, Buckels JA et al (2011) Laparoscopic posterior sectoral bile duct injury: the emerging role of nonoperative management with improved long-term results after delayed diagnosis. Surg Endosc 25:2684–2691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1630-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kirks RC, Barnes TE, Lorimer PD, Cochran A, Siddiqui I, Martinie JB, Baker EH, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D (2016) Comparing early and delayed repair of common bile duct injury to identify clinical drivers of outcome and morbidity. HPB (Oxford) 18:718–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mercado MA, Chan C, Orozco H, Hinojosa CA, Podgaetz E, Ramos-Gallardo G, Gálvez-Treviño R, Valdés-Villarreal M (2005) Prognostic implications of preserved bile duct confluence after iatrogenic injury. Hepatogastroenterology 52:40–44Google Scholar