Advertisement

Indian Journal of Surgery

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 102–102 | Cite as

Reviving Onlay Ventral Hernia Repair: a Novel Concept of Using a Hernia Stapler for Securing the Mesh

  • Manu KaushikEmail author
  • Niklas Glenesk
  • Sumet Silapaswan
Letter to Editor
  • 329 Downloads

Respected Editor,

Over the past decade, repair of ventral hernias with a mesh as opposed to primary closure with a suture has substantially improved the outcomes and has been accepted as the standard of care [1]. For laparoscopic repair, the mesh is placed in the preperitoneal space, but for open repair, multiple options are available. Recent and past literature have compared onlay and sublay repair, and sublay repair is widely accepted as the standard of care for the open approach. Each mesh repair has its theoretical benefits and risks [1]. Onlay repair is technically not as challenging as the sublay; however, it protects the mesh from intraperitoneal contents but at the same time is exposed to superficial wound infections. Inlay repair is technically easy, but the mesh is exposed to both intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal sources of infection.

Sublay repair is more complex to perform and involves dissection of the plane which can damage the muscle, vasculature and nerves of the rectus abdominis [1]. However, it avoids the creation of devascularizing flaps like in onlay repair which are amongst the major factors leading to the failure of the repair. In our experience, proper tacking of the mesh can reduce the rate of recurrence. Since 2013, we started doing onlay repair for recurrent ventral hernias at our institution and tacked the mesh with an absorbable suture and reinforced the repair by fixation of the mesh with hernia staples. A remarkable drop in rates of recurrences has been noted with reduced wound complications. This concept can be refuted by various available studies in the literature; however, certain studies have shown that in the case of larger hernias, the recurrence rate is higher after sublay closure [2]. This ongoing dilemma remains to be heavily debated among various practicing surgeons and surgical societies. A recent article published in The American Journal of Surgery showed that using onlay mesh placement with an adhesive is equally safe and effective as the sublay repair [3].

Hernia recurrence is a distressing event for both the patient and the operating surgeon. Various repairs have been promoted by different studies and reviews, but we think the major factor in preventing recurrence and wound infection is the surgical technique, choice of mesh and the methods used for tacking the mesh. The use of a hernia stapler for securing the mesh in an onlay repair is a novel concept which has shown better results in our institution with a reduction in the incidence of recurrences and mesh infections.

References

  1. 1.
    Baracs J, Sajjadi GS, Kelemen D, Horvath OP, Vereczkei A et al (2016) Open treatment of abdominal wall hernias: mesh repair is superior to suture repair and onlay mesh is better than sublay mesh—five-year multicentric, prospective, randomised clinical trial. Surgery Curr Res 6:270.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1076.1000270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weber G, Baracs J, Horvath OP (2010 Oct) “Onlay” mesh provides significantly better results than “sublay” reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh—results of a five years follow-up. Magy Seb 63(5):302–311.  https://doi.org/10.1556/MaSeb.63.2010.5.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haskins IN, Voeller GR, Stoikes NF et al; Onlay with adhesive use compared with sublay mesh placement in ventral hernia repair: was Chevrel right? An Americas Hernia Society quality collaborative analysisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Providence Hospital and Medical CenterMichigan State UniversitySouthfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations