Advertisement

Indian Journal of Surgery

, Volume 80, Issue 6, pp 580–585 | Cite as

Analysis of Outcomes After Surgical Correction for Hirschsprung’s Disease: Are the Long-Term Results of the Transanal and Transabdominal Pull-Through Operations Equally Satisfying for Children and Their Parents?

  • Patrycja SosnowskaEmail author
  • Michał Błaszczyński
  • Sebastian Moryciński
  • Przemysław Mańkowski
Original Article
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the long-term outcome after surgical correction of Hirschsprung’s disease using a standardised questionnaire designed specifically to address the long-term results, in correlation to the physical examination of each patient. The data was collected from the medical records of patients treated over a 15 year period (2000–2014). Sixty-two patients were treated, 33 using one-stage and 29 using multistage surgical procedures. Twenty-seven children took part in the whole study, which consisted of personal interview, completing the questionnaire and physical examination. The Duhamel-Martin and transanal endorectal pull through techniques were used. Statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA 10. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The Mann-Whitney’s test and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient were used. The most common side effect after surgical treatment was faecal incontinence (23 patients). There was no correlation between the method of the surgery and number of side effects. Postoperatively, there were significant correlations (p < 0.05) between the number of loose stools and the growth of these patients, 48% of the children were outside the normal centile (10–90) and 74% for weight, with consideration to their sex and age. This group of patients was below the 10th centile for weight and growth. There are significant deviations in the patients’ development after surgical treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease. The long-term results after surgical procedure were satisfactory for children and their parents.

Keywords

Aganglionosis Child Outcome assessment Postoperative complications Surgery 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

This study was not founded by any institution.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Swenson O, Sherman JO, Fisher JH (1973) Diagnosis of congenital megacolon: an analysis of 501 cases. J Pediatr Surg 8:587–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ehrenpreiss TH (1970) Hirschsprung’s disease. Year Book Publishers, Chicago, pp 58–60Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Puri P, Nixon HH (1977) Long term results of Swenson’s operation for Hirschsprung’s disease. Prog Pediatr Surg 10:87–96Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kleinhaus S, Boley SJ, Sherman M et al (1979) Hirschsprung’s disease: a survey of the Surgical Section of the American Academy for Pediatrics. J Pediatr Surg 16:588–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holschneider AM (1982) Hirschsprung’s disease. Thieme-Stratton, Stuttgart, pp 237–240Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soave F (1985) Endorectal pullthrough: 20 years experience. J Pediatr Surg 20:568–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ikeda K, Goto S (1984) Diagnosis and treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease in Japan. An analysis of 1628 patients. Ann Surg 199:400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nixon HH (1985) Hirschsprung’s disease: progress in management and diagnostics. World J Surg 9:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foster P, Cowan G, Wrenn E (1990) Twenty-five years experience with Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 25:531–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rescorla FJ, Morrison AM, Engles D et al (1992) Hirschsprung’s disease. Evaluation of mortality and long term function in 260 cases. Arch Surg 127:934–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klein MD, Philippart AI (1993) Hirschsprung’s disease: three decades experience at a single institution. J Pediatr Surg 28:1291–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shono K, Hutson JM (1994) The treatment of postoperative complications of Hirschsprung’s disease—a 10 year experience. Pediatr Surg Int 9:362–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clausen EG, Davies OG (1963) Early and late complications of the Swenson pull-through operation. Am J Surg:372–380Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kluck P, Ten Kate FJW, van der Kamp AWM et al (1986) Pathological explanation for postoperative obstipation in Hirschsprung’s disease revealed by monoclonal antibody staining. Am J Clin Path 86:490–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Molenaar J, Tibboel D, van der Kamp AWM et al (1989) Diagnosis of innervation-related motility disorders of the gut. Prog Pediatr Surg 24:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moore SW, Albertyn R, Cywes S (1996) Clinical outcome and long-term quality of life after surgical correction of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 31:1496–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dahal GR, Wang JX, Guo LH et al (2011) Long-term outcome of children after single-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. World J Pediatr 7:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De La Torre L, Langer JC (2010) Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease: technique, controversies, pearls, pitfalls, and an organized approach to the management of postoperative obstructive symptoms. Semin Pediatr Surg 19:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Niedźwiecka Z, Palczewska I (1999) Siatka centylowa masy i długości ciała. Instytut Matki i Dziecka, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    El-Sawaf MI, Drongowski RA, Chamberlain JN et al (2007) Are the long-term results of the transanal pull-through equal to those of the transabdominal pull-through? A comparison of the 2 approaches for Hirschsprung disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 42:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sosnowska P, Blaszczyński M (2016) A 15-year experience with the one-stage surgery for treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease in newborns, infants, and young children. Indian J Surg 77:1109–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stringer MD, Oldham KT, Mouriquand PDE et al (2006) Pediatric surgery and urology. Long-term outcomes, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, p 425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Langer JC, Durrant AC, De La Torre L et al (2003) One-stage transanal soave pull-through for Hirschsprung disease. A multicenter experience with 141 children. Ann Surg 569–576Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Catto-Smith AG, Trajanovska M, Taylor R (2007) Long-term continence after surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:2273–2282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Catto-Smith AG, Coffey CM, Nolan TM (1995) Fecal incontinence after the surgical treatment of Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr 127:954–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Surgery, Traumatology and UrologyUniversity of Medical Sciences in Poznan, Karol Jonscher University HospitalPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations