Advertisement

Indian Journal of Surgery

, Volume 77, Supplement 3, pp 1301–1307 | Cite as

Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review

  • Marcello PicchioEmail author
  • Ettore Greco
  • Annalisa Di Filippo
  • Giuseppe Marino
  • Francesco Stipa
  • Erasmo Spaziani
Review Article

Abstract

Surgical therapy guaranties satisfactory results, which are significantly better than those obtained with conservative therapies, especially for Grade III and IV hemorrhoids. In this review, we present and discuss the results of the most diffuse surgical techniques for hemorrhoids. Traditional surgery for hemorrhoids aims to remove the hemorrhoids, with closure (Fergusson’s technique) or without closure (Milligan–Morgan procedure) of the ensuing defect. This traditional approach is effective, but causes a significant postoperative pain because of wide external wounds in the innervated perianal skin. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy, proposed by Longo, has gained a vast acceptance because of less postoperative pain and faster return to normal activities. In the recent literature, a significant incidence of recurrence after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was reported, when compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Double stapler hemorrhoidopexy may be an alternative to simple stapled hemorrhoidopexy to reduce the recurrence in advanced hemorrhoidal prolapse. Transanal hemorrhoidal deartertialization was showed to be as effective as stapled hemorrhoidopexy in terms of treatment success, complications, and incidence recurrence. However, further high-quality trials are recommended to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique.

Keywords

Hemorrhoids Surgery Indication Resection Stapler 

References

  1. 1.
    Rivadeneira DE, Steele SR, Ternent C, Chalasani S, Buie WD, Rafferty JL (2010) Standards practice task force of the American society of colon and rectal surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised 2010). Dis Colon Rectum 54:1059–1064. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318225513d] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D'Ugo S, Franceschilli L, Cadeddu F, Leccesi L, Blanco Gdel V, Calabrese E, Milito G, Di Lorenzo N, Gaspari AL, Sileri P (2013) Medical and surgical treatment of haemorrhoids and anal fissure in Crohn's disease: a critical appraisal. BMC Gastroenterol 13:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-47 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomson WH (1975) The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 62:542–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hussein HM (2001) Ligation-anopexy for treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1887–1890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pakravan F, Helmes C, Baeten C (2009) Transanal open hemorrhoidopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 52:503–506. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197d703 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chung CC, Ha JP, Tai YP, Tsang WW, Li MK (2002) Double-blind, randomized trial comparing harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy, and scissors excision: Ligation technique. Dis Colon Rectum 45:789–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abo-hashem AA, Sarhan A, Aly AM (2010) Harmonic scalpel compared with bipolar electro-cautery hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 8:243–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.01.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsunoda A, Sada H, Sugimoto T, Kano N, Kawana M, Sasaki T, Hashimoto H (2011) Randomized controlled trial of bipolar diathermy vs ultrasonic scalpel for closed hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 3:147–152. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v3.i10.147 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH (2010) Pain after conventional versus Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy. A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 8:269–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.001, PMID: 20388563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gentile M, De Rosa M, Carbone G, Pilone V, Mosella F, Forestieri P (2011) LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional diathermy for IV-degree haemorrhoids: is it the treatment of choice? A randomized. Clinical Trial, ISRN Gastroenterol. doi: 10.5402/2011/467258, 467258Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franceschilli L, Stolfi VM, D' Ugo S, Angelucci GP, Lazzaro S, Picone E, Gaspari A, Sileri P (2011) Radiofrequency versus conventional diathermy Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1345–1350. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1216-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwok SY, Chung CC, Tsui KK, Li MK (2005) A double-blind, randomized trial comparing LigaSure and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:344–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ho YH, Buettner PG (2007) Open compared with closed haemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol 11:135–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ui Y (1997) Anoderm-preserving, completely closed hemorrhoidectomy with no mucosal incision. Dis Colon Rectum 40:S99–S101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patel N, O’Connor T (1996) Suture haemorrhoidectomy: a day-only alternative. Aust N Z J Surg 66:830–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mathai V, Ong BC, Ho YH (1996) Randomized controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy with haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 83:380–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6078 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang J, Cui PJ, Han HZ, Tong DN (2013) Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol 19:4799–4807. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4799 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee KC, Chen HH, Chung KC, Hu WH, Chang CL, Lin SE, Tsai KL, Lu CC (2013) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes for stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Surg 11:914–918. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.07.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, McDonald PJ, Phillips RK (1998) Double-blind randomised controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day case haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 351:169–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ala S, Saeedi M, Eshghi F, Mirzabeygi P (2008) Topical metronidazole can reduce pain after surgery and pain on defecation in postoperative hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:235–238. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9174-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vinson-Bonnet B, Coltat JC, Fingerhut A, Bonnet F (2002) Local infiltration with ropivacaine improves immediate postoperative pain control after hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 45:104–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gorfine SR, Onel E, Patou G, Krivokapic ZV (2011) Bupivacaine extended-release liposome injection for prolonged postsurgical analgesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1552–1559. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318232d4c1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haas E, Onel E, Miller H, Ragupathi M, White PF (2012) A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation. Am Surg 78:574–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Silverman R, Bendick PJ, Wasvary HJ (2005) A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of a calcium channel blocker ointment on pain after hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1913–1916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Amoli HA, Notash AY, Shahandashti FJ, Kenari AY, Ashraf H (2011) A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of topical diltiazem on post-hemorrhoidectomy pain. Colorectal Dis 13:328–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02138.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sugimoto T, Tsunoda A, Kano N, Kashiwagura Y, Hirose K, Sasaki T (2013) A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of diltiazem gel on pain after hemorrhoidectomy. World J Surg 37:2454–2457. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2124-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ratnasingham K, Uzzaman M, Andreani SM, Light D, Patel B (2010) Meta-analysis of the use of glyceryl trinitrate ointment after haemorrhoidectomy as an analgesic and in promoting wound healing. Int J Surg 8:606–611. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Franceschilli L, D'Ugo S, de Luca E, Cadeddu F, Milito G, di Lorenzo N, Gaspari AL, Sileri P (2013) Role of 0.4 % glyceryl trinitrate ointment after haemorrhoidectomy: Results of a prospective randomised study. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:365–369. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1544-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cross T, Bartlett L, Mushaya C, Ashour M, Ho YH (2012) Glyceryl trinitrate ointment did not reduce pain after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int Surg 97:112–119. doi: 10.9738/CC92.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Patti R, Almasio PL, Arcara M, Sammartano S, Romano P, Fede C, Di Vita G (2007) Botulinum toxin vs topical glyceryl trinitrate ointment for pain control in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 50:122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singh B, Box B, Lindsey I, George B, Mortensen N, Cunningham C (2009) Botulinum toxin reduces anal spasm but has no effect on pain after haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 11:203–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01549.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gupta PJ, Heda PS, Kalaskar S, Tamaskar VP (2008) Topical sucralfate decreases pain after hemorrhoidectomy and improves healing: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:231–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tegon G, Pulzato L, Passarella L, Guidolin D, Zusso M, Giusti P (2009) Randomized placebo-controlled trial on local applications of opioids after hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol 13:219–224. doi: 10.1007/s10151-009-0518-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    La Torre F, Nicolai AP (2004) Clinical use of micronized purified flavonoid fraction for treatment of symptoms after hemorrhoidectomy: Results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 47:704–710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ba-bai-ke-re MM, Huang HG, Re WN, Fan K, Chu H, Ai EH, Li-Mu MM, Wang YR, Wen H (2011) How we can improve patients' comfort after Milligan-Morgan open haemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastroenterol 17:1448–1456. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i11.1448 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    O'Donovan S, Ferrara A, Larach S, Williamson P (1994) Intraoperative use of Toradol facilitates outpatient hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:793–799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    London NJ, Bramley PD, Windle R (1997) Effect of four days of preoperative lactulose on posthaemorrhoidectomy pain: Results of a placebo-controlled trial. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 295:363–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ingram M, Wright TA, Ingoldby CJ (1998) A prospective randomized study of calcium alginate (Sorbsan) versus standard gauze packing following haemorrhoidectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 43:308–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Joshi GP, Neugebauer EA (2010) PROSPECT Collaboration. Evidence-based management of pain after haemorrhoidectomy surgery. Br J Surg 97:1155–1168. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7161 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen HH, Wang JY, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM, Yeh CY, Tang R (2002) Risk factors associated with posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1096–1099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bleday R, Pena JP, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Buls JG (1992) Symptomatic hemorrhoids: Current incidence of complications of operative therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 35:477–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, Cioffi U, De Simone M, Salamina G, Contessini-Avesani E, Peracchia A (2001) Randomized controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapsed. Am J Surg 182:64–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: Randomized controlled trial. Lancet 355:782–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, Eu KW, Tang CL, Seow-Choen F (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound assessment at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A (2003) Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: Randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 27:203–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ceci F, Picchio M, Palimento D, Calì B, Corelli S, Spaziani E (2008) Long-term outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1107–1112. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9333-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S, Degregori S, Merigliano S (2006) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile? Colorectal Dis 8:130–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Arroyo A, Pérez-Vicente F, Miranda E, Sánchez A, Serrano P, Candela F, Oliver I, Calpena R (2006) Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. World J Surg 30:1305–1310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zaheer S, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup D (1998) Urinary retention after operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 41:696–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open haemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1437–1444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systemic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S, Nivatvongs S (2004) Procedure for Prolapse and Hemmorrhoids (PPH) Multicenter Study Group. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: Perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Guy RJ, Seow-Choen F (2003) Septic complications after treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 90:147–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    McCloud JM, Jameson JS, Scott AN (2006) Life-threatening sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 8:748–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    American Gastroenterological Association (2004) Technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of haemorrhoids. Gastroenterology 126:1463–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, Bottini C, Carriero A, Milito G, Dodi G, Mascagni D, Orsini S, Pietroletti R, Ripetti V, Tagariello GB (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: Can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ommer A, Wenger FA, Rolfs T, Walz MK (2008) Continence disorders after anal surgery-a relevant problem? Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1023–1031. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0524-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G, Gabrielli F, Canuti S (2007) Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 94:1033–1037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW (2001) Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1449–1455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM (2004) Randomized controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs. conventional haemorrhoidectomy: a three and a half year follow-up. Colorectal Dis 6:37–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, Renda A (2006) Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:668–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Schmidt J, Dogan N, Langenbach R, Zirngibl H (2009) Fecal urge incontinence after stapled anopexia for prolapse and hemorrhoids: a prospective, observational study. World J Surg 33:355–364. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9818-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Khubchandani I, Fealk MH, Reed JF III (2009) Is there a post-PPH syndrome? Tech Coloproctol 13:141–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Efthimiadis C, Kosmidis C, Grigoriou M, Anthimidis G, Vasiliadou K, Baka S, Gerasimidou D, Basdanis G (2011) The stapled hemorrhoidopexy syndrome: a new clinical entity? Tech Coloproctol 15(Suppl 1):S95–S99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Nyström PO, Qvist N, Raahave D, Lindsey I, Mortensen N (2010) Stapled or Open Pile Procedure (STOPP) trial study group. Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapsed. Br J Surg 97:167–176. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6804 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 46:93–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Guenin MO, Rosenthal R, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C (2005) Long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson’s haemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1523–1527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Jóhannsson HO, Graf W, Påhlman L (2002) Long-term results of haemorrhoidectomy. Eur J Surg 168:485–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Thaha MA, Campbell KL, Kazmi SA, Irvine LA, Khalil A, Binnie NR, Hendry WS, Walker A, Staines HJ, Steele RJ (2009) Prospective randomised multi-centre trial comparing the clinical efficacy, safety and patient acceptability of circular stapled anopexy with closed diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Gut 58:668–678. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.151266 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Mattana C, Coco C, Manno A, Verbo A, Rizzo G, Petito L, Sermoneta D (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the cure of fourth-degree hemorrhoids: Long-term evaluation and clinical results. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1770–1775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kim JS, Vashist YK, Thieltges S, Zehler O, Gawad KA, Yekebas EF, Izbicki JR, Kutup A (2013) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids: Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1292–1298. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2220-7] CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G (2007) Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:245–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Naldini G, Martellucci J, Talento P, Caviglia A, Moraldi L, Rossi M (2009) New approach to large haemorrhoidal prolapse: Double stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1383–1387. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0750-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Stuto A, Favero A, Cerullo G, Braini A, Narisetty P, Tosolini G (2012) Double stapled haemorrhoidopexy for haemorrhoidal prolapse: Indications, feasibility and safety. Colorectal Dis 14:e386–e389. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02965.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Raahave D, Jepsen LV, Pedersen IK (2008) Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: Follow-up to five years. Dis Colon Rectum 51:334–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Festen S, van Geloven AA, Gerhards MF (2009) Redo procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids (PPH) for persistent and recurrent prolapse after PPH. Dig Surg 26:418–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Whitehouse P, Sains P, McFall MR, Baig MK (2012) A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0796-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Elmér SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE (2013) A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 56:484–490. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827a8567 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Picchio
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Ettore Greco
    • 1
  • Annalisa Di Filippo
    • 3
  • Giuseppe Marino
    • 1
  • Francesco Stipa
    • 2
  • Erasmo Spaziani
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryCivil Hospital “P. Colombo”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryHospital “S. Giovanni-Addolorata”RomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of SurgerySapienza University of RomeLatinaItaly
  4. 4.LatinaItaly

Personalised recommendations