This work aims to explore the application value and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic enterolysis surgery for the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction. A total of 126 inpatient cases of intestinal adhesion were selected. In order to observe the effects and complications of surgery, the patients were randomly assigned into laparoscopic and laparotomy groups, with 63 cases in each group. The operative time, blood loss, postoperative ambulation time, exhaustion time, postoperative analgesia number of patients, and hospital days of the patients in the laparoscopic group were compared with those in the control group, and the differences were all statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the laparoscopy group, two patients experienced rupture of the small intestine during the surgery, but recovered well after endoscopic suture repair, although there was one case of postoperative pulmonary infection. The difference was statistically significant in the laparotomy group of patients, with one case of intestinal fistula, two cases of surgical wound infection, one case of incisional hernia, three cases of postoperative pulmonary infection, and one case of urinary tract infection. Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic enterolysis surgery has shorter operative time, less blood loss, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer complications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work is supported by Hunan Provincial Planning Project of Science and Technology of China (No. 2013FJ4224), Hunan Provincial Social Science Foundation of China (No. 12YBA323) and Hunan Provincial Planning Project of Science and Technology of China (No. 2012FJ3058).
Ohtsuka T, Nagai E, Toma H, Ohuchida K, Takanami H, Odate S et al (2011) Single-incision laparoscopy-assisted surgery for bowel obstruction: report of three cases. Surg Today 41:1519–1523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saklani AP, Naguib N, Shah PR, Mekhail P, Winstanley S, Masoud AG (2013) Adhesive intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection. Color Dis 15:80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schölin J, Buunen M, Hop W, Bonjer J, Anderberg B, Cuesta M et al (2011) Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 25:3755–3760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang Q, Hu ZQ, Wang WJ, Zhang J, Wang Y, Ruan CP (2009) Laparoscopic management of recurrent adhesive small-bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up. Surg Today 39:493–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Broek RP, Van Goor H (2008) Laparoscopic reintervention in colorectal surgery. Minerva Chir 63:161–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Matthews BD, Heniford BT (2007) Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am Surg 73:773–779PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tarhan OR, Barut I, Akdeniz Y, Sutcu R, Cerci C, Bulbul M (2008) Fibrinolytic responses of human peritoneal fluid in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical study. Surg Endosc 22:1008–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouaïssi M, Gaujoux S, Veyrie N, Denève E, Brigand C, Castel B et al (2012) Post-operative adhesions after digestive surgery: their incidence and prevention: review of the literature. J Visc Surg 149:e104–e114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manohar T, Desai M, Desai M (2007) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign and inflammatory conditions. J Endourol 21:1323–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Nunobe S, Ohyama S, Yamaguchi T (2010) Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for patients with earlier upper abdominal open surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:16–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saribeyoğlu K, Pekmezci S, Korman U, Kol E, Baca B, Günay S (2008) Selective laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the management of acute and chronic recurrent adhesive bowel obstruction. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 14:28–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
O'Connor DB, Winter DC (2012) The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 cases. Surg Endosc 26:12–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vettoretto N, Carrara A, Corradi A, De Vivo G, Lazzaro L, Ricciardelli L et al (2012) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis: consensus conference guidelines. Color Dis 14:e208–e215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polymeneas G, Theodosopoulos T, Stamatiadis A, Kourias E (2001) A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15:41–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binnebösel M, Klinge U, Rosch R, Junge K, Lynen-Jansen P, Schumpelick V (2008) Morphology, quality and composition in mature human peritoneal adhesions. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafen FC, Neuhaus V, Schöb O, Turina M (2010) Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:57–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed KL, Stucchi AF, Leeman SE, Becker JM (2008) Inhibitory effects of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist on postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 11:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini GJ, Petroski GF, Lin WC, Sporn E, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2008) Nationwide impact of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions in the management of intestinal obstruction in the US. J Am Coll Surg 207:520–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpay Z, Saed GM, Diamond MP (2008) Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention. Semin Reprod Med 26:313–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu X, Thill V, Simoens CH, Smets D, Ngongang C, Debergh N et al (2008) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: a retrospective study on 156 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 55:522–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rosin D, Zmora O, Hoffman A, Khaikin M, Bar Zakai B, Munz Y et al (2007) Low incidence of adhesion-related bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:604–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar