Indian Journal of Surgery

, Volume 74, Issue 5, pp 359–363 | Cite as

Efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy on Wound Healing in Patients with Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers—A Randomised Control Trial

  • Basavaraj M. Kajagar
  • Ashok S. Godhi
  • Archit Pandit
  • S. Khatri
Original Article


Foot ulcers are serious complications of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and are known to be resistant to conventional treatment. They may herald severe complications if not treated wisely. Electromagnetic radiations in the form of photons are delivered to the ulcers in laser form to stimulate healing. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in diabetic ulcer healing dynamics. To determine mean percentage reduction of wound area in study and control groups. Settings: KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belgaum. Study Design: Randomized-Control Study. Methods: A total of 68 patients with Type 2 DM having Meggitt-Wagner Grade I foot ulcers of atleast more than 4 weeks duration, less than 6 × 6 cm2 with negative culture were studied. Patients were randomized into two groups of 34 each. Patients in study group received LLLT with conventional therapy and those in control group were treated with conventional therapy alone. Healing or percentage reduction in ulcer area over a period of 15 days after commencement of treatment was recorded. Statistical Analysis: Unpaired Student T Test and Mann Whitney U test. Mean age of the patients was 50.94 years in control group and 54.35 years in study group (p = 0.065). There was no significant difference between control and study group with respect to mean FBS and HbA1c levels (p > 0.05), suggesting no biochemical differences between two groups. Initial ulcer area was 2608.03 mm2 in study group and 2747.17 mm2 in control group (p = 0.361). Final ulcer area was 1564.79 mm2 in study group and 2424.75 mm2 in control group (p = 0.361). Percentage ulcer area reduction was 40.24 ± 6.30 mm2 in study group and 11.87 ± 4.28 mm2 in control group (p < 0.001, Z = 7.08). Low Level Laser Therapy is beneficial as an adjunct to conventional therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU).


Adjuvant therapies Diabetic foot ulcers Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) Wound healing 


  1. 1.
    Aboderin I, Kalache A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lynch JW, Yajnik CS, Kuh D et al (2001) Life course perspectives on coronary heart disease, stroke and diabetes: key issues and implications for policy and research. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bal A, Das AK, Pendsey S, Suresh KR, Vishwanathan V, Ambardekar P (2005) Handbook of diabetic foot care. Diabetic Foot Society of India, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brem H, Sheehan P, Rosenberg HJ, Schneider JS, Boulton AJ (2006) Evidence-based protocol for diabetic foot ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):193S–209SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2002. US Dept of Health and Human Services, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eldor R, Raz I, Ben Yehuda A, Boulton AJ (2004) New and experimental approaches to treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a comprehensive review of emerging treatment strategies. Diabet Med 21(11):1161–1173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steed DL (1997) The role of growth factors in wound healing. Surg Clin N Am 77:575–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Millington JT, Norris TW (2000) Effective treatment strategies for diabetic foot wounds. J Fam Pract 49(11):S40–S48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dyson M (2007) Adjuvant therapies; ultrasound, laser therapy, electrical stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen and VAC-therapy. In: Morrison MJ, Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ (eds) Leg ulcers: a problem-based learning approach. Mosby, Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 429–451Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rinaldi F, Alberetto M, Pontiroli A (1993) The diabetic foot. General considerations and proposal of a new therapeutic and preventive approach. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 21(1):43–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baxter GD (1994) Therapeutic lasers: theory and practice. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferney R, Mauro T (1999) Using lasers in diabetic wound healing. Diabetes Technol Ther 1(2):189–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Damme H, Limet R (2005) The diabetic foot. Rev Med Liege 60(5–6):516–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Armstrong DG (2002) Clinical examination of diabetic foot and identification of at risk patient. In: Morrison MJ, Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ (eds) Leg ulcers: a problem-based learning approach. Mosby, Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 163–176Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shobhana R, Rama Rao P, Lavanya A, Viswanathan V, Ramachandra A (2000) Cost burden to diabetic patients with foot complications—a study from southern India. JAPI 48:1147–1150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boulton M, Marshall J (1986) He-Ne laser stimulation of human fibroblast proliferation and attachment in vitro. Laser Life Sci 1:125–134Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landau Z, Schattner A (2001) Topical hyperbaric oxygen and low energy laser therapy for chronic diabetic foot ulcers resistant to conventional treatment. Yale J Biol Med 74(2):95–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schindl A, Heinze G, Schindl M, Pernerstorfer-Schon H, Schindl L (2002) Systemic effects of low-intensity laser irradiation on skin microcirculation in patients with diabetic microangiopathy. Microvasc Res 64(2):240–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pereira AN, Eduardo Cde P, Matson E, Marques MM (2002) Effect of low power laser irradiation on cell growth and procollagen synthesis of cultured fibroblasts. Laser Surg Med 31:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dyson M, Young S (1986) Effect of laser therapy on wound contraction and cellularity in mice. Lasers Med Sci 1:126–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brem H, Sheehan P, Boulton AJM (2004) Protocol for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Am J Surg 187(5A):1S–10SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schindl M, Kerschan K, Schindl A, Schon H, Heinzl H, Schindl L (1999) Induction of complete wound healing in recalcitrant ulcers by low-intensity laser irradiation depends on ulcer cause and size. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 15(1):18–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maiya GA, Kumar P, Rao L (2005) Effect of low intensity helium-neon (He-Ne) laser irradiation on diabetic wound healing dynamics. Photomed Laser Surg 23(2):187–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Basford C (1989) Low energy laser therapy: controversies and new research findings. Lasers Surg Med 9:1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haas AF, Isseroff RR, Wheeland RG, Rood PA, Graves PJ (1990) Low energy helium-neon laser irradiation increases the motility of human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 94:822–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu W, Naim JO, Lanzafame RJ (1994) The effects of photo-irradiation on the secretion of TGF and PDGF from fibroblasts in vitro. Laser Surg Med Suppl 6:8Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schindl A, Schindl M, Schon H, Knobler R, Havelec L, Schindl L (1998) Low-intensity laser irradiation improves skin circulation in participants with diabetic microangiopathy. Diabetes Care 21(4):580–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Medrado AR, Pughese LS, Reis SR, Andrade ZA (2003) Influence of low level laser therapy on wound healing and its biological action on myofibroblasts. Laser Surg Med 32:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koutam M, Janisch R, Veselska R (2003) Effects of low power laser irradiation on cell proliferation. Scr Med 73(3):163–172Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hopkins J, Todd A, Jeff G, Seegmiller G, Baxter D (2004) Low level laser therapy facilitates superficial wound healing in humans: a triple-blind, sham-controlled Study. J Athl Train 39(3):223–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gupta AK, Filonenko N, Salansky N, Sadder DN (1998) The use of low energy photon therapy (LEPT) in venous leg ulcers: a double blind, placebo-controlled study. Dermatol Surg 24:1383–1386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Surgeons of India 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basavaraj M. Kajagar
    • 1
  • Ashok S. Godhi
    • 1
  • Archit Pandit
    • 1
  • S. Khatri
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryJawaharlal Nehru Medical CollegeBelgaumIndia
  2. 2.KLE’S College of PhysiotherapyBelgaumIndia

Personalised recommendations