A one year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis, in adults
- 112 Downloads
To compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in co-relation to histopathology report for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
A prospective study of the patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at K.L.E.S. Hospital and M.R.C. Belgaum. The clinical, radiological and ultrasonogrpahic data of 60 patients with suspected appendicits was collected. These patients were evaluated by modified Alvarado here and ultrasonographically, which was correlated with histopatholocial finding.
Out of 60 patients, 38.33% had acute appendicitis. 40% had modified Alvarado score ≥ 7 and 38.33% patients were ultrasonographically positive. In the present study, modified Alvarado score has sensitivity of 78.26%, specificity 83.78%, positive predictive value 75.00%, negative predictive value 86.11%, diagnostic accuracy 81.00% false positive error rate 16.22% and false negative error rate 21.74%. Ultrasonography had sensitivity of 82.61%, specificity of 89.19%, positive predictive value of 82.61, negative predictive value of 89.19.Diagnostic accuracy of 86.67%, false positive error rate of 10.81%, false negative error rate of 17.39%. When modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography were positive, 17 true positive cases and no false positive cases. The false negative cases in modified Alvarado score were five. When it was combined with ultrasonography the false negative cases reduced to two that is 60% reduction in false negative cases.
Modified Alvarado score is useful tool in clinical decision making. When compared with ultrasonography neither one is advantageous. However, additional information provided by ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy.
KeywordsModified Alvarado Score Ultrasonography Acute Appendicitis
- 1.Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO (1989) Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 76:7749Google Scholar
- 2.Jones PF (1976) Active observation in the management of acute abdominal pain in childhood. Br J Surg ii:551–553Google Scholar
- 4.Puylaert JBCM (1986) Acute Appendicitis: Ultrasound sonography evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:35–60Google Scholar
- 5.Jaffrey RB, Laing FC, Lewis FR (1987) Acute appendicitis high resolution real time ultrasound findings. Radiology 163:11–14Google Scholar
- 6.Kalen M, Rich AJ, Talbot DR, Canlitie WJ (1994) Evaluation of modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76: 418–419Google Scholar
- 7.Douglas CD, Macpherson NE, Davidson PM, Gani JS (2000) Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis incorporating the Alvarado score. Br J Surg 321:1–7Google Scholar
- 9.Yascoe ME, Jeffrey B (1994) Sonography of appendicitis and diverticulities. Radiol Clin North Am 32: 899–921Google Scholar
- 12.Sooriakumaran P, Lovell D, Brown R (2005) A comparison of clinical judgment Vs the modified Alvarado score in acute appendicitis. International Journal of Surgery 3:59–52Google Scholar
- 15.Ida Chan, Simon G, Bicknell Mary Graham (2005) Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting Appendicitis in a community Hospital. AJR 184: 1809–1812Google Scholar