Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 283–293 | Cite as

Methane hydroxylation by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b: Monitoring the biocatalyst activity for methanol production optimization in an innovative membrane bioreactor

  • N. Pen
  • L. Soussan
  • M.-P. Belleville
  • J. Sanchez
  • D. Paolucci-Jeanjean
Research Paper

Abstract

A quasi-total loss of the bacterial hydroxylating activity was identified to be responsible for methanol production stop. Different strategies acting on the reaction mixture were implemented to apprehend the biocatalyst behavior in view to extend methanol production. Activity monitoring showed first that sodium formate addition did not maintain the biocatalyst activity and even disrupted bacterial equilibrium when added into the reaction mixture with still active biocatalysts. Reaction medium renewals had no influence on methanol production and highlighted a limited hydroxylating potential of the biocatalyst while addition of fresh biocatalysts in the reaction mixture resulted in methanol consumption. Finally, performing hydroxylation directly in the native bacterial culture appeared as a way to enhance methanol production by both release of intracellular methanol accumulated in the cells during cultivation and effective production by methane hydroxylation.

Keywords

biocatalyst activity membrane bioreactor methane hydroxylation methanol Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b production optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aratani, Y., Y. Yamada, and S. Fukuzumi (2015) Selective hydroxylation of benzene derivatives and alkanes with hydrogen peroxide catalysed by a manganese complex incorporated into mesoporous silica-alumina. Chem. Commun. 51: 4662–4665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sivaramakrishna, A., P. Suman, E. V. Goud, S. Janardan, C. Sravani, C. S. Yadav, and H. S. Clayton (2012) Recent progress in oxidation of n-alkanes by heterogeneous catalysis. Res. Rev. Mat. Sci. Chem. 1: 75–103.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park, D. H. and J. Lee (2013) Biological conversion of methane to methanol. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 30: 977–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rojo, F. (2009) Degradation of alkanes by bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 11: 2477–2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lieberman, R. L. and A. C. Rosenzweig (2004) Biological methane oxidation: Regulation, biochemistry, and active site structure of particulate methane monooxygenase. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39: 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anthony, C. (1986) Bacterial oxidation of methane and methanol. Adv. Microbial. Physiol. 27: 113–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, H. G., G. H. Han, and S. W. Kim (2010) Optimization of lab scale methanol production by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Biotechnol. Bioproc. Eng. 15: 476–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, S. G., J. H. Goo, H. G. Kim, J. I. Oh, Y. M. Kim, and S. W. Kim (2004) Optimization of methanol biosynthesis from methane using Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Biotechnol. Lett. 26: 947–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duan, C., M. Luo, and X. Xing (2011) High-rate conversion of methane to methanol by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 7349–7353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mehta, P. K., S. Mishra, and T. K. Ghose (1991) Methanol biosynthesis by covalently immobilized cells of Methylosinus trichosporium: Batch and continuous studies. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 37: 551–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mehta, P. K., S. Mishra, and T. K. Ghose (1987) Methanol accumulation by resting cells of Methylosinus-trichosporium (I). J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 33: 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Furuto, T., M. Takeguchi, and I. Okura (1999) Semicontinuous methanol biosynthesis by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. J. Mol. Catal. a-Chem. 144: 257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sugimori, D., M. Takeguchi, and I. Okura (1995) Biocatalytic methanol production from methane with Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b: An approach to improve methanol accumulation. Biotechnol. Lett. 17: 783–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pen, N., L. Soussan, M. P. Belleville, J. G. Sanchez Marcano, C. Charmette, and D. Paolucci-Jeanjean (2014) An innovative membrane bioreactor for methane biohydroxylation. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 7349–7353.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ito, H., F. Mori, K. Tabata, I. Okura, and T. Kamachi (2014) Methane hydroxylation using light energy by the combination of thylakoid and methane monooxygenase. Rsc Adv. 4: 8645–8648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balasubramanian, R., S. M. Smith, S. Rawat, L. A. Yatsunyk, T. L. Stemmler, and A. C. Rosenzweig (2010) Oxidation of methane by a biological dicopper centre. Nature 465: 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang, Y., P. C. Wilkins, and H. Dalton (1993) Activation of the hydroxylase of sMMO from Methylococcus-capsulatus (Bath) by hydrogen-peroxide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1163: 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsen, J. B., S. Yang, L. Y. Stein, D. Beck, and M. G. Kalyuzhnaya (2013) Global molecular analyses of methane metabolism in methanotrophic alphaproteobacterium, Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Part I: Transcriptomic study. Frontiers in Microbiol. 4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takeguchi, M., T. Furuto, D. Sugimori, and I. Okura (1997) Optimization of methanol biosynthesis by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b: An approach to improve methanol accumulation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 68: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zollner, H. (1999) Handbook of Enzyme Inhibitors. 3rd ed. Wiley-VCH, NY, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adegbola, O. (2008) High cell density methanol cultivation of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, PhD thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Queens University, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chistoserdova, L., J. A. Vorholt, and M. E. Lidstrom (2005) A genomic view of methane oxidation by aerobic bacteria and anaerobic archaea. Genome Biol. 6:208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanson, R. S. and T. E. Hanson (1996) Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 60: 439–471.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li J, Gan JH, Mathews FS, Xia ZX (2011) The enzymatic reaction-induced configuration change of the prosthetic group PQQ of methanol dehydrogenase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 406: 621–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Pen
    • 1
  • L. Soussan
    • 1
  • M.-P. Belleville
    • 1
  • J. Sanchez
    • 1
  • D. Paolucci-Jeanjean
    • 1
  1. 1.IEM (Institut Europeen des Membranes), UMR 5635 (CNRS-ENSCMUM2), Universite Montpellier II, Place E. BataillonMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations