Advertisement

Second-line therapy in metastatic renal cell cancer—how do we treat after immuno-oncology drugs?

  • Ursula VoglEmail author
short review
  • 10 Downloads

Summary

The treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is rapidly evolving. To date in 2019 twelve drugs are licensed for this indication, two more drugs are awaited to be introduced into our portfolio of treatment options by the end of the year. First-line treatment has robust clinical trial data and is clearly stated by the consensus guidelines. It consists either of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy for favorable risk patients—defined by the Heng or IMDC (International mRCC Database Consortium) score—or the immuno-oncology (IO) combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo) for intermediate- and poor-risk patients who are eligible for this treatment. To date we have a clearly positive phase III trial of a TKI-IO combination that was superior to standard of care with sunitinib in untreated metastatic patients independent of the risk group. Pembrolizumab and axitinib will be most likely introduced to the treatment landscape by the end of the year. Despite all these very enthusiastic treatment options in first line, subsequent treatment recommendations are missing due to the lack of data. Only retrospective data can be used as a tool to make the right choice after the use of an IO drug in first line.

Keywords

Pembrolizumab Checkpoint inhibitor Tyrosine kinase Inhibitor Nivolumab Ipilimumab 

Notes

Conflict of interest

U. Vogl declares that she has no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Albiges L, Powles T, Staehler M, et al. Updated European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: immune checkpoint inhibition is the new backbone in first-line treatment of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2019;76(2):151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol. 2019;75(5):799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-updagger. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5):706–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jonasch E. NCCN guidelines updates: management of metastatic kidney cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(5.5):587–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T, et al. Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1814–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Ren M, et al. Independent assessment of lenvatinib plus everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(1):e4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Tomczak P, et al. Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(6):552–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S, et al. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9637):449–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barata PC, De Liano AG, Mendiratta P, et al. The efficacy of VEGFR TKI therapy after progression on immune combination therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2018;119(2):160–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah AY, Kotecha RR, Lemke EA, et al. Outcomes of patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with second-line VEGFR-TKI after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors. Eur J Cancer. 2019;114:67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1116–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choueiri TK, Halabi S, Sanford BL, et al. Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of poor or intermediate risk: the Alliance A031203 CABOSUN Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(6):591–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Motzer RJ, Nosov D, Eisen T, et al. Tivozanib versus sorafenib as initial targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(30):3791–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Auvray M, Auclin E, Barthelemy P, et al. Erratum to ‘Second-line targeted therapies after nivolumab-ipilimumab failure in metastatic renal cell carcinoma’ [Eur J Cancer 108 (February 2019) 33–40]. Eur J Cancer. 2019;119:200–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, et al. Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(12):1103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmidinger M, Pichler R, Loidl W, et al. Real-World Evidence Data on Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Treatment in Austria: The RELACS Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(5):e957–e67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OncologyBarmherzige Schwestern WienViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations