Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of gefitinib and pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy in advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patients and methods Patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC harboring asensitive EGFR mutation were included in this study and randomly divided into gefitinib + placebo group and gefitinib + pemetrexed group. Pemetrexed or placebo was administered on day 1 at a dose of 500 mg/m2, and gefitinib was sequentially administered on days 2 ~ 16. This treatment regimen was repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression. All investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of gefitinib + pemetrexed group were higher than that of gefitinib + placebo group but only the difference of DCR between two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of gefitinib + placebo group and gefitinib + pemetrexed group were 14.0 months vs. 18 months respectively and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The 2-year PFS rates of gefitinib + pemetrexed group (20.00 %) was higher than that of gefitinib + placebo group (8.89 %) and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median overall survival (OS) of gefitinib + placebo group and gefitinib + pemetrexed group were 32.0 months vs. 34 months respectively and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The 3-year OS rates of gefitinib + pemetrexed group (44.44 %) was higher than that of gefitinib + placebo group (35.56 %) but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Major grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. The main grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities were infection, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, fatigue, diarrhea and pneumonitis. The difference of toxicities between two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The combination regimen of gefitinib + pemetrexed used in this study showed a higher ORR and DCR, longer median PFS and acceptable toxicity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel R et al. (2012) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62(4):220–241
Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME (2001) EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer 37(Suppl 4):S9–15
Onn A et al. (2004) Synchronous overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2-neu protein is a predictor of poor outcome in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10(1 Pt 1):136–143
Lonardo F et al. (2002) Evidence for the epidermal growth factor receptor as a target for lung cancer prevention. Clin Cancer Res 8(1):54–60
Larsen AK et al. (2011) Targeting EGFR and VEGF(R) pathway cross-talk in tumor survival and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Ther 131(1):80–90
Lichtenberger BM et al. (2010) Autocrine VEGF signaling synergizes with EGFR in tumor cells to promote epithelial cancer development. Cell 140(2):268–279
Yatabe Y, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T (2008) Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification is acquired in association with tumor progression of EGFR-mutated lung cancer. Cancer Res 68(7):2106–2111
Barr S et al. (2008) Bypassing cellular EGF receptor dependence through epithelial-to-mesenchymal-like transitions. Clin Exp Metastasis 25(6):685–693
Gazdar AF et al. (2004) Mutations and addiction to EGFR: the Achilles ‘heal’ of lung cancers? Trends Mol Med 10(10):481–486
Pao W, Miller VA (2005) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, small-molecule kinase inhibitors, and non-small-cell lung cancer: current knowledge and future directions. J Clin Oncol 23(11):2556–2568
Mok TS et al. (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 361(10):947–957
Mitsudomi T et al. (2010) Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11(2):121–128
Inoue A et al. (2009) First-line gefitinib for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations without indication for chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 27(9):1394–1400
Morita S et al. (2009) Combined survival analysis of prospective clinical trials of gefitinib for non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations. Clin Cancer Res 15(13):4493–4498
Han JY et al. (2012) First-SIGNAL: first-line single-agent iressa versus gemcitabine and cisplatin trial in never-smokers with adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 30(10):1122–1128
Paz-Ares L et al. (2010) Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis. J Cell Mol Med 14(1–2):51–69
Jackman D et al. (2010) Clinical definition of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(2):357–360
Gainor JF, Shaw AT (2013) Emerging paradigms in the development of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3987–3996
Goldberg SB et al. (2013) Chemotherapy with erlotinib or chemotherapy alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncologist 18(11):1214–1220
Okabe T et al. (2008) Synergistic antitumor effect of S-1 and the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines: role of gefitinib-induced down-regulation of thymidylate synthase. Mol Cancer Ther 7(3):599–606
Chen CY et al. (2011) Thymidylate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma: the association with treatment efficacy of pemetrexed. Lung Cancer 74(1):132–138
Eisenhauer EA et al. (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247
Lynch TJ et al. (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 350(21):2129–2139
Paez JG et al. (2004) EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304(5676):1497–1500
Maemondo M et al. (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362(25):2380–2388
Zhou C et al. (2011) Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 12(8):735–742
Rosell R et al. (2012) Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(3):239–246
Li TH et al. (2007) Schedule-dependent cytotoxic synergism of pemetrexed and erlotinib in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 13(11):3413–3422
Johnson BE et al. (2005) Preliminary phase II safety evaluation of ZD6474, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, as 1(st)-line treatment in patients with NSCLC. J Clin Oncol 23(16):645s–645s
Giaccone G et al. (2004) Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial-INTACT1. J Clin Oncol 22(5):777–784
Davies AM et al. (2009) Intermittent erlotinib in combination with pemetrexed phase I schedules designed to achieve Pharmacodynamic separation. J Thorac Oncol 4(7):862–868
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Chaolun An, Jiajun Zhang and Hongjun Chu contributed equally to this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
An, C., Zhang, J., Chu, H. et al. Study of Gefitinib and Pemetrexed as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring EGFR Mutation. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 22, 763–768 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-016-0067-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-016-0067-4