Disinfection of raw water is essential to the production of drinking water. However, by-products of disinfection may exert toxic effects. The potential toxic effects of two of these compounds, 4-ethylbenzaldehyde (EBA) and 2,4-difluoroaniline (DFA) were investigated using the zebrafish (Danio rerio) model. The two compounds, dissolved, were introduced in duplicate aquariums containing zebrafish in two different concentrations based on LC50 values. The aquarium water containing EBA or DFA was changed every 96 h throughout the 3 months of treatment. Behavior of the fish in each replicate was inspected twice daily. In course of treatment with both concentrations, fish exposed to DFA displayed behavior associated with visible anxiety, while EBA treated were lethargic and did not evade capture. Application of both concentrations of each component into the aquarium water resulted in dystrophic lesions in the liver, kidney and skin of the fish while preneoplastic lesions and tumors were not observed.
4-ethylbenzaldehyde 2,4-difluoroaniline Zebrafish Water disinfection byproducts
Air saturation volume
This work was funded by the Center of Excellence in Environmental Industry at Szent István University (RET-12/2005), the Baross Program (BAROSS-HALDEC 09), by the Hungarian National Research Fund (OTKA NNF 78834), and by the National Office for Research and Technology of Hungary.
Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Toledano MB, Elliott P (2000) Uptake of chlorination disinfection by-products; a review and a discussion of its implications for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 10:586–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cognet L, Courtois Y, Mallevialle J (1986) Mutagenic activity of disinfection by-products. Environ Health Perspect 69:165–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff NW et al (2001) Human cell mutagenicity of chlorinated and unchlorinated water and the disinfection byproduct 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone (MX). Mutat Res 495:157–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
Morris RD et al (1992) Chlorination, chlorination by-products, and cancer: a meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 82:955–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bove GE Jr, Rogerson PA, Vena JE (2007) Case control study of the geographic variability of exposure to disinfectant byproducts and risk for rectal cancer. Int J Health Geogr 6:18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villanueva CM et al (2007) Bladder cancer and exposure to water disinfection by-products through ingestion, bathing, showering, and swimming in pools. Am J Epidemiol 165:148–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sujbert L et al (2006) Genotoxic potential of by-products in drinking water in relation to water disinfection: survey of pre-ozonated and post-chlorinated drinking water by Ames-test. Toxicology 219:106–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racz G et al (2004) Rapid communication: water disinfection by-products enhanced apoptotic activity in human lymphocytes. J Toxicol Environ Health A 67:1315–1319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner SW et al (2006) Occurrence of a new generation of disinfection byproducts. Environ Sci Technol 40:7175–7185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar