Virologica Sinica

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 314–323 | Cite as

Identification and characterization of two cleavage fragments from the Aquareovirus nonstructural protein NS80

  • Qingxiu Chen
  • Jie Zhang
  • Fuxian Zhang
  • Hong Guo
  • Qin FangEmail author
Research Article


Aquareovirus species vary with respect to pathogenicity, and the nonstructural protein NS80 of aquareoviruses has been implicated in the regulation of viral replication and assembly, which can form viral inclusion bodies (VIBs) and recruit viral proteins to its VIBs in infected cells. NS80 consists of 742 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 80 kDa. Interestingly, a short specific fragment of NS80 has also been detected in infected cells. In this study, an approximately 58-kDa product of NS80 was confirmed in various infected and transfected cells by immunoblotting analyses using α-NS80C. Mutational analysis and time course expression assays indicated that the accumulation of the 58-kDa fragment was related to time and infection dose, suggesting that the fragment is not a transient intermediate of protein degradation. Moreover, another smaller fragment with a molecular mass of approximately 22 kDa was observed in transfected and infected cells by immunoblotting with a specific anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody or α-NS80N, indicating that the 58- kDa polypeptide is derived from a specific cleavage site near the amino terminus of NS80. Additionally, different subcellular localization patterns were observed for the 22-kDa and 58-kDa fragments in an immunofluorescence analysis, implying that the two cleavage fragments of NS80 function differently in the viral life cycle. These results provide a basis for additional studies of the role of NS80 played in replication and particle assembly of the Aquareovirus.


Aquareovirus nonstructural protein NS80 cleavage fragments subcellular localization functional analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold MM, Murray KE, Nibert ML. 2008. Formation of the factory matrix is an important, though not a sufficient function of nonstructural protein mu NS during reovirus infection. Virology, 375: 412–423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Attoui H, Fang Q, Mohd Jaafar F, Cantaloube JF, Biagini P, de Micco P, de Lamballerie X. 2002. Common evolutionary origin of aquareoviruses and orthoreoviruses revealed by genome characterization of Golden shiner reovirus, Grass carp reovirus, Striped bass reovirus and golden ide reovirus (genus Aquareovirus, family Reoviridae). J Gen Virol, 83: 1941–1951.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker MM, Peters TR, Dermody TS. 2003. Reovirus sigma NS and mu NS proteins form cytoplasmic inclusion structures in the absence of viral infection. J Virol, 77: 5948–5963.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandariz-Nunez A, Menaya-Vargas R, Benavente J, Martinez- Costas J. 2010. Avian reovirus microNS protein forms homooligomeric inclusions in a microtubule-independent fashion, which involves specific regions of its C-terminal domain. J Virol, 84: 4289–4301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Broering TJ, Arnold MM, Miller CL, Hurt JA, Joyce PL, Nibert ML. 2005. Carboxyl-proximal regions of reovirus nonstructural protein muNS necessary and sufficient for forming factory-like inclusions. J Virol, 79: 6194–6206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Broering TJ, Kim J, Miller CL, Piggott CD, Dinoso JB, Nibert ML, Parker JS. 2004. Reovirus nonstructural protein mu NS recruits viral core surface proteins and entering core particles to factory-like inclusions. J Virol, 78: 1882–1892.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brookes SM, Hyatt AD, Eaton BT. 1993. Characterization of virus inclusion bodies in bluetongue virus-infected cells. J Gen Virol, 74: 525–530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Busch LK, Rodriguez-Grille J, Casal JI, Martinez-Costas J, Benavente J. 2011. Avian and mammalian reoviruses use different molecular mechanisms to synthesize their {micro}NS isoforms. J Gen Virol, 92: 2566–2574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai L, Sun X, Shao L, Fang Q. 2011. Functional investigation of grass carp reovirus nonstructural protein NS80. Virol J, 8: 168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng L, Fang Q, Shah S, Atanasov IC, Zhou ZH. 2008. Subnanometer- resolution structures of the grass carp reovirus core and virion. J Mol Biol, 382: 213–222.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng L, Zhu J, Hui WH, Zhang X, Honig B, Fang Q, Zhou ZH. 2010. Backbone model of an aquareovirus virion by cryo-electron microscopy and bioinformatics. J Mol Biol, 397: 852–863.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan C, Fang Q. 2009a. Functional Analyses of Mammalian Reovirus Nonstructural Protein muNS and Expression. Virol Sin, 24: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan C, Shao L, Fang Q. 2010. Characterization of the nonstructural protein NS80 of grass carp reovirus. Arch Virol, 155: 1755–1763.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan C, Zhang L, Lei C, Fang Q. 2009b. Expression and Identification of Inclusion Forming-related Domain of NS80 Nonstructural Protein of Grass Carp Reovirus. Virol Sin, 24: 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fang Q, Ke LH, Cai YQ. 1989. Growth characterization and high titre culture of GCHV. Virol Sin, 3: 314–319.Google Scholar
  16. Fang Q, Shah S, Liang Y, Zhou ZH. 2005. 3D reconstruction and capsid protein characterization of grass carp reovirus. Sci China C Life Sci, 48: 593–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fields BN, Raine CS, Baum SG. 1971. Temperature-sensitive mutants of reovirus type 3: defects in viral maturation as studied by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. Virology, 43: 569–578.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo H, Sun X, Yan L, Shao L, Fang Q. 2013. The NS16 protein of aquareovirus-C is a fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) protein, and its activity can be enhanced by the nonstructural protein NS26. Virus Res, 171: 129–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivanovic T, Boulant S, Ehrlich M, Demidenko AA, Arnold MM, Kirchhausen T, Nibert ML. 2011. Recruitment of cellular clathrin to viral factories and disruption of clathrin-dependent trafficking. Traffic, 12: 1179–1195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Ji WT, Lin FL, Wang YC, Shih WL, Lee LH, Liu HJ. 2010. Intracellular cleavage of sigmaA protein of avian reovirus. Virus Res, 149: 71–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kobayashi T, Chappell JD, Danthi P, Dermody TS. 2006. Genespecific inhibition of reovirus replication by RNA interference. J Virol, 80: 9053–9063.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kobayashi T, Ooms LS, Chappell JD, Dermody TS. 2009. Identification of functional domains in reovirus replication proteins muNS and mu2. J Virol, 83: 2892–2906.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee PW, Hayes EC, Joklik WK. 1981. Characterization of antireovirus immunoglobulins secreted by cloned hybridoma cell lines. Virology, 108: 134–146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mertens P, Attoui H, Duncan R, Dermody T, et al. 2011. The Double Stranded RNA viruses. In Virus Taxonomy. Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Edited by Andrew MQ King, Adams Michael J, Carstens Eric B, Lefkowitz Elliot J. Oxford: Elsevier: 497–650.Google Scholar
  25. Miller CL, Broering TJ, Parker JS, Arnold MM, Nibert ML. 2003. Reovirus sigma NS protein localizes to inclusions through an association requiring the mu NS amino terminus. J Virol, 77: 4566–4576.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller CL, Arnold MM, Broering TJ, Hastings CE, Nibert ML. 2010. Localization of mammalian orthoreovirus proteins to cytoplasmic factory-like structures via nonoverlapping regions of microNS. J Virol, 84: 867–882.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Parker JS, Broering TJ, Kim J, Higgins DE, Nibert ML. 2002. Reovirus core protein mu2 determines the filamentous morphology of viral inclusion bodies by interacting with and stabilizing microtubules. J Virol, 76: 4483–4496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Rangel AA, Rockemann DD, Hetrick FM, Samal SK. 1999. Identification of grass carp haemorrhage virus as a new genogroup of aquareovirus. J Gen Virol, 80: 2399–2402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shao L, Fan C, Maj E, Fang Q. 2010. Molecular characterization of nonstructural protein NS38 of grass carp reovirus. Virol Sin, 25: 123–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Shao L, Guo H, Yan LM, Liu H, Fang Q. 2013. Aquareovirus NS80 recruits viral proteins to its inclusions, and its C-terminal domain is the primary driving force for viral inclusion formation. PLoS One, 8: e55334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sharpe AH, Chen LB, Fields B N. 1982. The interaction of mammalian reoviruses with the cytoskeleton of monkey kidney CV- 1 cells. Virology, 120: 399–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaw AL, Samal SK, Subramanian K, Prasad BV. 1996. The structure of aquareovirus shows how the different geometries of the two layers of the capsid are reconciled to provide symmetrical interactions and stabilization. Structure, 4: 957–967.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Silverstein SC, Schur PH. 1970. Immunofluorescent localization of double-stranded RNA in reovirus-infected cells. Virology, 41: 564–566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith RE, Furuichi Y. 1980. Gene mapping of cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus of silkworm by the full-length mRNA prepared under optimized conditions of transcription in vitro. Virology, 103: 279–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Touris-Otero F, Martinez-Costas J, Vakharia VN, Benavente J. 2004. Avian reovirus nonstructural protein microNS forms viroplasm- like inclusions and recruits protein sigmaNS to these structures. Virology, 319: 94–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Varela R, Martinez-Costas J, Mallo M, Benavente J. 1996. Intracellular posttranslational modifications of S1133 avian reovirus proteins. J Virol, 70: 2974–2981.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiener JR, Bartlett JA, Joklik WK. 1989. The sequences of reovirus serotype 3 genome segments M1 and M3 encoding the minor protein mu 2 and the major nonstructural protein mu NS, respectively. Virology, 169: 293–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yan L, Liu H, Li X, Fang Q. 2014. The VP2 protein of grass carp reovirus (GCRV) expressed in a baculovirus exhibits RNA polymerase activity. Virol Sin, 29: 86–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan L, Zhang J, Guo H, Yan S, Chen Q, Zhang F, Fang Q. 2015. Aquareovirus NS80 initiates efficient viral replication by retaining core proteins within replication-associated viral inclusion bodies. PLoS One, 10: e0126127.Google Scholar
  40. Yang C, Ji G, Liu H, Zhang K, Liu G, Sun F, Zhu P, Cheng L. 2012. Cryo-EM structure of a transcribing cypovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109: 6118–6123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang J, Guo H, Chen Q, Zhang F, Fang Q. 2016. The N-Terminal of aquareovirus NS80 is required for interacting with viral proteins and viral replication. PLoS One, 11: e0148550.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang X, Jin L, Fang Q, Hui WH, Zhou ZH. 2010. 3.3 A cryo-EM structure of a nonenveloped virus reveals a priming mechanism for cell entry. Cell, 141: 472–482.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Wuhan Institute of Virology, CAS and Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qingxiu Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jie Zhang
    • 1
  • Fuxian Zhang
    • 1
  • Hong Guo
    • 1
  • Qin Fang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan Institute of VirologyChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.University of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations