Advertisement

Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 72–82 | Cite as

Determination of the Confidence Interval of the Relative Standard Deviation Using Convolution

  • Yijie Gao
  • Marianthi G. Ierapetritou
  • Fernando J. Muzzio
Research Article

Abstract

Coefficient of variation is a widely used measure of dispersion and is important in comparing variables with different units or average values. In pharmaceutical industry, it is termed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) and is used widely to describe blend concentration variability, finished dose variability, dissolution q point variability, etc. Although theoretical formula and simulation methods for the estimation of the RSD confidence interval have been developed in previous literature, they are not well known, and they are either too complex to apply easily or require intensive computation. As a result, the statistical reliability of RSD estimates are rarely evaluated, which increases process risk as well as consumer risk. In this paper, we introduce a novel convolution numerical method for the quick and straightforward estimation of RSD confidence intervals. A standard statistical distribution group is developed, denoted as the Chi-on-Mu-square distribution, which is similar to the widely used Chi-square distribution. Results indicate the Chi-square distribution itself can be a good approximation in the RSD confidence interval calculation, especially when small RSD is expected or large number of samples is involved. The effect of deviations from the normal distribution populations is also discussed.

Keywords

Coefficient of variation Confidence interval Relative standard deviation Quality by design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center on Structured Organic Particulate Systems, through grant NSF-ECC 0540855 and by grant NSF-0504497.

References

  1. 1.
    Xu J, Bai L. Sampling distribution of the coefficient of variation when the population takes normal distribution N(0, σ2). Adv Mater Res. 2011;291–294:3300–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Subrahmanya Nairy K, Aruna Rao K. Tests of coefficients of variation of normal population. Comm Stat Simul Comput. 2003;32(3):641–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: powder blends and finished dosage units—stratified in-process dosage unit sampling and assessment. In: Gad SC, editor. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Handbook: Regulations and Quality. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pernenkil L, Cooney CL. A review on the continuous blending of powders. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61(2):720–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKay AT. Distribution of the coefficient of variation and the extended “t” distribution. J R Stat Soc. 1932;95(4):695–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hendricks WA, Robey KW. The sampling distribution of the coefficient of variation. Ann Math Stat. 1936;7(3):129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hürlimann W. A uniform approximation to the sampling distribution of the coefficient of variation. Stat Probab Lett. 1995;24(3):263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Banik S, Kibria BMG. Estimating the population coefficient of variation by confidence intervals. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2011;40(8):1236–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Almonte C, Kibria BMG. On some classical, bootstrap and transformation confidence intervals for estimating the mean of an asymmetrical population. Model Assist Stat Appl. 2009;4(2):91–104.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou XH, Dinh P. Nonparametric confidence intervals for the one- and two-sample problems. Biostatistics. 2005;6(2):187–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andersson PG. Alternative confidence intervals for the total of a skewed biological population. Ecology. 2004;85(11):3166–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahmoudvand R, Hassani H. Two new confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation in a normal distribution. J Appl Stat. 2009;36(4):429–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yijie Gao
    • 1
  • Marianthi G. Ierapetritou
    • 1
  • Fernando J. Muzzio
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biochemical EngineeringRutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations