Secure multiuser MISO communication systems with limited feedback link
- 111 Downloads
Physical layer security is one of the promising techniques for the security of next-generation wireless systems. In this paper, we analyze the impact of the limited feedback link on the secrecy capacity for a system which includes a base station with multiple antennas, a single legitimate user selected from multiple active ones and multiple eavesdroppers. We propose to design a limited feedback link by reducing the feedback load and quantizing the channel state information (CSI) of legitimate users to establish a secure communication system. The feedback load is decreased with a self discrimination criterion at the legitimate users’ side while keeping the secrecy capacity constant. The best legitimate user is selected based on the quantized CSI through a limited feedback link. We also analyze the impact of CSI of eavesdroppers, which information may or may not be available at transmitter. In practical cases where eavesdroppers are passive and their location is not known by the transmitter, an artificial noise is used to disrupt their reception. When the CSI of eavesdroppers is known, the generalized singular value decomposition is applied. We illustrate the performance results of the proposed limited feedback link through the availability of CSI of eavesdroppers at the transmitter.
KeywordsPhysical layer security Reduced feedback link Quantized feedback Multiple antennas
This work has been carried out in the framework of TUBITAK 114E626 Project.
- 7.Parada P, Blahut R Secrecy capacity of SIMO and slow fading channels. Proceedings. International Symposium on Information Theory, 2005. ISIT 2005. Adelaide, SA, 2005, ppGoogle Scholar
- 8.Li Z, Trappe W, Yates R (2007) Secret Communication via Multi-antenna Transmission, 2007 41st Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, Baltimore, pp 905–910Google Scholar
- 9.Shafiee S, Ulukus S (2007) Achievable Rates in Gaussian MISO Channels with Secrecy Constraints, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Nice, pp 2466–2470Google Scholar
- 14.Geraci G, Couillet R, Yuan J, Debbah M, Collings IB (2013) Secrecy sum-rates with regularized channel inversion precoding under imperfect CSI at the transmitter, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vancouver, pp 2896–2900Google Scholar
- 16.Negi R, Goel S (2005) Secret communication using artificial noise, VTC-2005-Fall. 2005 IEEE 62nd Vehicular Technology Conference, pp 1906–1910Google Scholar
- 19.Ozdogan O, Ozbek B, Kurt GK (2016) Performance of secure multiuser MISO systems with threshold based user selection, 2016 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU), Zonguldak, pp 721–724Google Scholar
- 21.Deng H, Wang HM, Liu C, Wang W (2015) Performance Analysis of Linear Precoding for Secure Multiuser MIMO Systems with a Multiple-Antenna Eavesdropper, 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), San Diego, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- 22.Mo R, Yuen C, Zhang J, Chen X (2016) Beamforming design for secure downlink transmission of MU-MIMO systems with multi-antenna eavesdropper, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kuala Lumpur, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- 24.Gesbert D, Alouini MS (2004) How much feedback is multi-user diversity really worth?. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Paris, pp 234–238Google Scholar
- 27.Jindal N (2005) MIMO broadcast channels with finite rate feedback, GLOBECOM ’05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, pp 5Google Scholar