A non-coherent architecture for GNSS digital tracking loops

Article

Abstract

In this paper, a new, noncoherent architecture for global navigation satellite system tracking loops is proposed and analyzed. A noncoherent phase discriminator, able to extend the integration time beyond the bit duration, is derived from the maximum likelihood principle and integrated into a Costas loop. The discriminator is noncoherent in the sense that the bit information is removed by using a nonlinear operation. By jointly using such a discriminator and noncoherent integrations at the delay lock loop level, a fully noncoherent architecture, able to operate at low carrier-power-to-noise density ratio (C/N0), is obtained. The algorithms proposed have been tested by means of live GPS data and compared with existing methodologies, resulting in an effective solution for extending the total integration time.

Keywords

Coherent integration Global navigation satellite system GNSS Long integration Loop discriminators Noncoherent integration Tracking loops Weak signals 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to kindly acknowledge and thank Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) for funding this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Petovello M, O’Driscoll C, Lachapelle G (2008) Weak signal carrier tracking using extended coherent integration with an ultra-tight GNSS/IMU receiver. In: Proc. of the European navigation conference. ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lowe ST (1999) Voltage signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) nonlinearity resulting from incoherent summations. The telecommunications and mission operations progress report, TMO PR 42–137, Tech. Rep.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strässle C, Megnet D, Mathis H, Bürgi C (2007) The squaring-loss paradox. In: Proc. of ION/GNSS. Fort Worth, pp 2715–2722Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soloviev A, van Graas F, Gunawardena S (2004) Implementation of deeply integrated GPS/Low-cost IMU for reacquisition and tracking of low CNR GPS signals. In: Proc. of ION national technical meeting NTM. San Diego, pp 923–935Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soloviev A, Gunawardena S, van Graas F (2004) Deeply integrated GPS/Low-cost IMU for low CNR signal processing: flight test results and real time implementation. In: Proc. of ION/GNSS. Long Beach, pp 1598–1608Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Psiaki ML, Jung H (2002) Extended kalman filter methods for tracking weak GPS signals. In: Proc. of ION/GPS. Portland, pp 2539–2553Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kazemi PL, O’Driscoll C (2008) Comparison of assisted and stand-alone methods for increasing coherent integration time for weak GPS signal tracking. In: Proc. of ION/GNSS’08. SavannahGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pomalaza-Ráez CA (1991) Analysis of an all-digital data-transition tracking loop. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 28(4):1119–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simon MK, Tkacenko A (2006) Noncoherent data transition tracking loops for symbol synchronization in digital communication receivers. IEEE Trans Commun 54(5):889–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Driscoll C (2007) Performance analysis of the parallel acquisition of weak GPS signals. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Ireland, CorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hegarty CJ (2006) Optimal and near-optimal detector for acquisition of the GPS L5 signal. In: Proc. of ION NTM, National technical meeting. Monterey, pp 717–725Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borio D, O’Driscoll C, Lachapelle G (2009) Coherent, non-coherent and differentially coherent combining techniques for the acquisition of new composite GNSS signals. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hurskainen H, Lohan ES, Hu X, Raasakka J, Nurmi J (2008) Multiple gate delay tracking structures for GNSS signals and their evaluation with simulink, systemC, and VHDL. Int J Navig Obs 17Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Petovello MG, O’Driscoll C (2007) GSNRx™ User Manual, position, location and navigation (PLAN) group, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Cchulich School of Engineering, The University of Calgary, 2500 University drive NW Calgary, T2N 1N4Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stephens SA, Thomas J (1995) Controlled-root formulation for digital phase-locked loops. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 31(1):78–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Dierendonck AJ, Fenton P, Ford T (1992) Theory and performance of narrow correlator spacing in a gps receiver. NAVIGATION: J Inst Navig 39(3):265–283Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaplan ED, Hegarty CJ (eds.) (2005) Understanding GPS: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Artech House, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Betz JW, Kolodziejski KR (2008) Generalized theory of code tracking with early-late discriminator, part 1: lower bound and coherent processing. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst (in press)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Betz JW, Kolodziejski KR (2008) Generalized theory of code tracking with early-late discriminator, part 2: noncoherent processing and numerical results. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst (in press)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Betz JW (2001) Effect of partial-band interference on receiver estimation of C/N 0: theory. In: Proc. of ION national technical meeting. Long Beach, pp 817–828Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Betz JW, Shnidman NR (2007) Receiver processing losses with bandlimiting and one-bit sampling. In: Proc. of ION GNSS. Fort WorthGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lindsey WC, Simon MK (1991) Telecommunication systems engineering. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woo KT (1999) Optimum semi-codeless carrier phase tracking of l2. In: Proc. of ION GPS’99. Nashville, pp 289–305Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kazemi PL (2008) Optimum digital filters for GNSS tracking loops. In: Proc. of ION/GNSS’08. SavannahGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simon M, Lindsey W (1977) Optimum performance of suppressed carrier receivers with costas loop tracking. IEEE Trans Commun 25(2):215–227CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Instruments (2006) 2.7 GHz RF Vector Signal Analyzer with Digital Downconversion http://www.ni.com/pdf/products/us/cat_vectorsignalanalyzer.pdf

Copyright information

© Institut TELECOM and Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geomatics EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations