Advertisement

Specific absorption rate assessment near a base-station antenna (2,140 MHz): some key points

  • Fabrice Lacroux
  • Emmanuelle Conil
  • Albert Cortel Carrasco
  • Azeddine Gati
  • Man-Fai Wong
  • Joe Wiart
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, a numerical dosimetry study for a typical base-station antenna used in third generation system is presented. This study is based on the limits defined by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. The primary goal is to analyze the relationship between the antenna input powers required to reach the specific absorption rate (SAR) limit and those ones which are required to reach the power density limit. The secondary goal is to underline the key points which impact the local SAR in the case of such a directive antenna. Moreover, for these studies, two numerical approaches are used: the first one is only based on the finite difference time domain method and, in the second one, this algorithm is coupled with a method of moments simulator via a Huygens box. Investigations are made to ensure that a more suitable numerical approach is used.

Keywords

Exposure assessment Numerical dosimetry FDTD UMTS base-station antenna 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work has been supported by the Réseau National de Recherche en Télécommunications, project ADONIS/ISIS.

References

  1. 1.
    ICNIRP (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 744:494–522, AprilGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEEE, Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, 1999, IEEE standard C95-1-1999Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meyer FJC et al (2003) Human exposure assessment in the near field of GSM base-station antennas using a hybrid finite element/method of moments technique. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 502:224–233, FebruaryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dimbylow PJ (2002) Fine resolution calculations of SAR in the human body for frequencies up to 3GHz. Phys Med Biol. 47:2835–2846, JulyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martin A, Villar R, Martinez-Burdalo M (2005) Guidelines compliance at different frequencies near base-station antennas. Bioelectromagnetics 2005, Dublin, Ireland, June 19–24Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lacroux F et al (2006) SAR and averaged power density near a UMTS base-station antenna, 2006 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, San Francisco, June 11–16, 2006Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper J, Marx B, Buhl J, Hombach V (2002) Determination of safety distance limits for a human near a cellular base station antenna, adopting the IEEE standard or ICNIRP guidelines. Bioelectromagnetics. 23:429–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernardi P, Cavagnaro M, Pisa S, Piuzzi E (2000) Human exposure to radio base-station antennas in urban environment. IEEE Trans Microwave Theor Tech. 48(11):1996–2002 NovemberCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirata A, Kodera S, Wang J, Fujiwara O (2006) Mechanism for double-humped frequency characteristics of whole-body average SAR due to far-field exposure at ICNIRP reference level, EMC Europe, Barcelona, pp 598–602Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang J, Fujiwara O, Kodera S, Watanabe S (2006) FDTD calculation of whole body SAR in adults and child models for frequencies from 30 MHz to 3 GHz. Phys Med Biol. 51:4119–4127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hombach V (1996) The dependence of EM energy absorption upon head modeling at 900 MHz. IEEE Trans Microwave Theor Tech. 44(10):1865–1873OctoberCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bahr A, Manteuffel D, Heberling D (2000) Occupational safety in the near field of a GSM base station, in Proc. AP2000, Davos, Greece, April 2000, 3A6.7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Catarinucci L, Palazzari P, Tarricone L (2003) The use of numerical phantoms in the study of the human–antenna interaction problem. IEEE Antenn Wireless Propag Lett. 2:43–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    IEC 62209-1-Ed. 1.0, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices—human models, instrumentation, and procedures—Part 1: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for hand-held devices used in close proximity to the ear (frequency range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© GET and Springer Verlag France 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrice Lacroux
    • 1
  • Emmanuelle Conil
    • 1
  • Albert Cortel Carrasco
    • 1
  • Azeddine Gati
    • 1
  • Man-Fai Wong
    • 1
  • Joe Wiart
    • 1
  1. 1.France Telecom Research & Development DivisionIssy Les Moulineaux cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations