Advertisement

International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 943–948 | Cite as

Numerical Drag Reduction of a Ground Vehicle by NACA2415 Airfoil Structured Vortex Generator and Spoiler

  • Bayindirli CihanEmail author
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Using of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have big advanteges for design process components in the automotive industry. Flow structures around vehicle and drag forces can investigate in CFD without producing real size prototype vehicle. The drag force affect fuel efficiency and drivability too. In this study, the drag coefficient of 1/15 scale minibus model was minimizated by NACA 2415 airfoil structured vortex generator and front spoiler in Fluent®. Flow analyses were performed at the 5 different free stream velocities in the range of 2.8 × 105–6.6 × 105 Reynolds numbers, where the dynamic similarity condition was provided. The drag coefficient of base minibus model was 0.415. The CD coefficient of the model minibus was decreased 10.94 % with original designed NACA 2415 airfoil structured vortex generator in model 1. In total of 22.59 % drag reduction was obtained by designed front spoiler. The effect of this drag reduction on fuel consumption about 6 ~ 12 % at high vehicle speeds.

Key words

CD coefficient Minibus model CFD Vortex generetor NACA2415 Front spoiler 

Nomenclature

A

front surface are of bus model, m2

CD

drag coefficient

FD

drag force, N

U

free stream velocity, m/s

Re

reynolds number

υ

kinematic viscosity, m2/s

ρ

density of air, kg/m3

CFD

computational fluid dynamics

RNG

renormalization-group

vg

vortex generator

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akansu, Y. E., Bayindirli, C. and Seyhan, M. (2016). The improvement of drag force on a truck trailer vehicle by passive flow control methods. J. Thermal Science and Technolog 36, 1, 133–141.Google Scholar
  2. Al Saadi, S. M. F. (2017). Aerodynamic Characteristics of Peugeot 405 Car Model. M. S. Thesis. University of Baghdad. Baghdad, Iraq.Google Scholar
  3. Altaf, A., Omar, A. A. and Asrar, W. (2014). Passive drag reduction of square back road vehicles. J. Wind Engineering Industrial Aerodyamics, 134, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayindirli, C. and Çelik, M. (2018). The investigation of flow structure around of a minibus model by CFD method. Proc. IV Int. Academic Resarch Cong., Alanya, Turkey.Google Scholar
  5. Çengel, Y. A. and Cimbala, J. M. (2008). Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics and Applications. Güven Publish. İzmir, Turkey.Google Scholar
  6. Heinemann, T., Springer, M., Lienhart, H., Kniesburges, S. and Becker, S. (2012). Active flow control on a 1/4 car model. Proc. 16th Int. Symp. Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  7. Hetawal, S., Gophane, M., Ajay, B. K. and Mukkamala, Y. (2014). Aerodynamic study of formula SAE car. Procedia Engineering, 97, 1198–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. İnce, İ. T. (2010). Aerodynamic Analysis of GTD Model Administrative Service Vehicle. Ph. D. Dissertation. Gazi Universty Institute of Science. Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  9. Kajiwara, S. (2017). Passive variable rear-wing aerodynamics of an open wheel racing car. Automotive and Engine Technology 2, 1–4, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim, C. H. and Youn, C. B. (2005). Aerodynamic effect of roof fairing system on a heavy-duty truck. Int. J. Automotive Technology 6, 3, 221–227.Google Scholar
  11. Majdandžić, L., Buljić, D., Buljac, S. and Kozmar, H. (2018). Aerodynamic design of a solar road vehicle. Int. J. Automotive Technology 19, 6, 949–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nisugi, K., Hayase, T. and Shirai, A. (2004). Fundamental study of aerodynamic drag reduction for vehicle with feedback flow control. JSME Int. J. Series B. 47, 3, 584–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pal, S. S. and Singh, A. (2016). Design and simulate an aerodynamic car body for the Maruti Suzuki 800 with less coefficient of drag. Int. Research J. Engineering and Technology 3, 6, 299–303.Google Scholar
  14. Patil, C. N., Shashishekar, K. S., Balasubramanian, A. K. and Subbaramaiah, S. V. (2012). Aerodynamic study and drag coefficient optimization of passenger vehicle. Int. J. Engineering Research and Technology 1, 7, 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. Rakibul, H. S. M., Islam, T., Ali, M. and Quamrul, I. M. (2013). Numerical study on aerodynamic drag reduction of racing cars. Procedia Engineering, 90, 308–313.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© KSAE 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nigde Vocational School of Technical SciencesNigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityNigdeTurkey

Personalised recommendations