Advertisement

Ammonia Uniformity to Predict NOx Reduction Efficiency in an SCR System

  • Muhammad Khristamto Aditya Wardana
  • G. M. Hasan Shahariar
  • Kwangchul Oh
  • Ocktaeck LimEmail author
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The automotive industry has been restricted by several regulations to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from diesel engines. To adhere to the emission regulation, advanced engine technology aims to control oxygen access, compression, and ignition engine, while achieving both reduced fuel consumption and lowering unburnt HC, CO2, and CO levels. However, it is difficult to meet the NOx limits of the European standard (EURO VI) and American standard (US TIER 2 BIN 5). Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) with ammonia (NH3) has been successfully employed to remove NOx from diesel engines. However, uniform ammonia distribution is usually difficult to achieve. Therefore, a study on ammonia uniformity to predict NOx reduction efficiency in SCR systems is needed. The engine utilized in the experiment was turned on for a few minutes to obtain the desired temperature and airflow, and the simulation was performed using a commercial code of STAR-CCM+. This study was performed at engine operating conditions of 1500 rpm, 2000 rpm, and 3000 rpm; simulation was performed with a fixed pressure and velocity, as in the experiment, thus creating a similar turbulent swirl flow in the SCR system. Numerical results were validated using experimental results of ammonia concentration distribution.

Key words

Emission NH3 uniformity Selective catalytic reduction Wall impingement Diesel engine Urea Water Solution (UWS) 

Nomenclature

CFD

computational fluid dynamics

NOx

nitrogen oxide

CO2

carbon dioxide

O2

oxygen

K

temperature in kelvin

SCR

selective catalyst reduction

UWS

urea water solution

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auvray, X., Partridge, W., Choi, J. S., Pihl, J. and Coehlo, F. (2015). Kinetic modeling of NH3-SCR over a supported Cu zeolite catalyst using axial species distribution measurements. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental, 163, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baleta, J., Mikulcic, H., Vujanovic, M. and Petranovic, Z. (2016). Numerical simulation of urea based selective non-catalytic reduction deNOx process for industrial applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 125, 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharjee, S., Haworth, D. C. and Moores, R. (2011). CFD modeling of processes upstream of the catalyst for urea SCR NOx reduction systems in heavy-duty diesel applications. SAE Paper No. 2011-01-1322.Google Scholar
  4. Buwa, V. V., Deo, D. S. and Ranade, V. V. (2006). Eulerian-Lagrangian simulations of unsteady gas-liquid flows in bubble columns. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 32, 7, 864–885.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Chae, H. J., Choo, S. T., Choi, H. and Nam, I. (2000). Direct use of kinetic parameters for modeling and simulation of a selective catalytic reduction process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 39, 5, 1159–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colombo, M., Nova, I., Tronconi, E. and Weibel, M. (2014). Mathematical modelling of cold start effects over zeolite SCR catalysts for exhaust gas aftertreatment. Catalysis Today, 231, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conway, R., Chatterjee, S., Naseri, M. and Aydin, C. (2015). Demonstration of SCR on a diesel particulate filter system on a heavy duty application. SAE Paper No. 2015-01-1033.Google Scholar
  8. Fang, H. L. and DaCosta, H. F. M. (2003). Urea thermolysis and NOx reduction with and without SCR catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 46, 1, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forsthuber, F., Krenek, T., Marinitsch, F. and Lauer, T. (2013). Investigations on the tail-pipe emissions of commercial engines with advanced one-dimensional simulation methods. SAE Paper No. 2013-01-1117.Google Scholar
  10. Fu, M., Ge, Y., Wang, X., Tan, J., Yu, L. and Liang, B. (2013). NOx emissions from Euro IV busses with SCR systems associated with urban, suburban and freeway driving patterns. Science of the Total Environment, 452-453, 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaynor, P., Reid, B., Hargrave, G., Lockyer, T. and Wilson, J. (2015). An experimental investigation into DEF dosing strategies for heavy duty vehicle applications. SAE Int. J. Engines 8, 3, 1196–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gehrlein, J., Lang, A. and Palmer, G. (2009). Optimierung von SCR-systemen durch integration von mischelementen. MTZ - Motortechnische Zeitschrift 70, 3, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hua, S., Tian, H., Wang, K., Zhu, C., Gao, J. and Ma, Y. (2016). Atmospheric emission inventory of hazardous air pollutants from China’s cement plants: Temporal trends, spatial variation characteristics and scenario projections. Atmospheric Environment, 128, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iodice, P. and Senatore, A. (2015). Air pollution and air quality state in an italian national interest priority site. Part 2: The pollutant dispersion. Energy Procedia, 81, 637–643.Google Scholar
  15. Koebel, M. and Strutz, E. O. (2003). Thermal and hydrolytic decomposition of urea for automotive selective catalytic reduction systems: Thermochemical and practical aspects. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 42, 10, 2093–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marchitti, F., Nova, I. and Tronconi, E. (2016). Experimental study of the interaction between soot combustion and NH3-SCR reactivity over a Cu-Zeolite SDPF catalyst. Catalysis Today, 267, 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schaber, P. M., Colson, J., Higgins, S., Dietz, E., Thielen, D. and Anspach, B. (1999). Study of the urea thermal decomposition (pyrolysis) reaction and importance to cyanuric acid production. American Laboratory 31, 16, 13–21.Google Scholar
  18. Shahariar, G. M. H., Wardana, M. K. A. and Lim, O. T. (2018). Investigation of urea-water solution spray impingement on the hot surface of automotive SCR system. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 32, 6, 2935–2946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, H., Lauer, T., Mayer, M. and Pierson, S. (2014). Optical and numerical investigations on the mechanisms of deposit formation in SCR systems. SAE Int. J. Fuels and Lubricants 7, 2, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. STAR-CCM+ Guide (2018). STAR-CCM + ® Documentation.Google Scholar
  21. Ström, H., Lundström, A. and Andersson, B. (2009). Choice of urea-spray models in CFD simulations of urea-SCR systems. Chemical Engineering Journal 150, 1, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Varna, A., Boulouchos, K., Spiteri, A. and Dimopoulos, E. P. (2014). Numerical modelling and experimental characterization of a pressure-assisted multi-stream injector for SCR exhaust gas after-treatment. SAE Int. J. Engines 7, 4, 2012–2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Varna, A., Spiteri, A., Wright, Y. and Boulouchos, K. (2015). Experimental and numerical assessment of impingement and mixing of urea-water sprays for nitric oxide reduction in diesel exhaust. Applied Energy, 157, 824–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yi, Y. (2007). Development of a 3D numerical model for predicting spray, urea decomposition and mixing in SCR systems. SAE Paper No. 2007-01-3985.Google Scholar
  25. Zhang, X. and Romzek, M. (2006). 3-D numerical study of mixing characteristics of NH3 in front of SCR. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-3444.Google Scholar
  26. Zheng, G., Palmer, G., Salanta, G. and Kotrba, A. (2009). Mixer development for urea SCR applications. SAE Paper No. 2009-01-2879.Google Scholar
  27. Ziran, M., Wu, X. and Si, Z. (2015). Low-temperature SCR activity and SO2 deactivation mechanism of Cemodified V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst. Progress in Natural Science Material International 25, 4, 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KSAE 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Khristamto Aditya Wardana
    • 1
  • G. M. Hasan Shahariar
    • 1
  • Kwangchul Oh
    • 2
  • Ocktaeck Lim
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Graduate School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of UlsanUlsanKorea
  2. 2.Research Engineer, Korea Automotive Technology InstitutePungse-myeon, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, ChungnamKorea
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of UlsanUlsanKorea

Personalised recommendations