Characterizing Driver Stress Using Physiological and Operational Data from Real-World Electric Vehicle Driving Experiment
Electric Vehicle (EV) is becoming a viable and popular option, but the acceptance of the technology can be challenging and lead to an elevated driving stress. The existing studies on stress of vehicle driving has been mainly limited to the non-EVs or survey analysis. In this research, EV driving data of 40 subjects is analyzed, where each subject was asked to drive an EV over a 53 km course in a suburban city of South Korea. Physiological data including electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye-gazing were obtained along with vehicle operational data such as state of charge, altitude, and speed. The dataset was rich in information, but individual difference and nonlinear patterns made it extremely difficult to draw meaningful insights. As a solution, an information-theoretic framework is proposed to evaluate mutual information between physiological and operational data as well as the entropy of physiological data itself. The result shows two groups of subjects, one not showing much evidence of stress and the other exhibiting sufficient stress. Among the subjects who showed sufficient driving stress, 9 out of the top 10 high EEG-entropy drivers were female, one driver showed a strong pattern of range anxiety, and several showed patterns of uphill climbing anxiety.
Key wordsDriver stress Electric vehicle Electroencephalogram (EEG) Information theory Real-world driving
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Eilebrecht, B., Wolter, S., Lem, J., Lindner, H. J., Vogt, R., Walter, M. and Leonhardt, S. (2012). The relevance of HRV parameters for driver workload detection in real world driving. Proc. IEEE Computing in Cardiology (CinC), Krakow, Poland, 409–412.Google Scholar
- Nilsson, M. (2011). Electric Vehicles: The Phenomenon of Range Anxiety. ELVIRE. Sweden.Google Scholar
- Rahimi-Eichi, H. and Chow, M. Y. (2014). Big-data framework for electric vehicle range estimation. Proc. IEEE 40th Annual Conf. Industrial Electronics Society, Dallas, Texas, USA, 5628–5634.Google Scholar
- SAE On-road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee (2014). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. SAE Standard. J3016. 1–16.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, E., Decke, R. and Rasshofer, R. (2016). Correlation between subjective driver state measures and psychophysiological and vehicular data in simulated driving. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. (IV), Gothenburg, Sweden, 1380–1385.Google Scholar
- Solovey, E. T., Zec, M., Garcia Perez, E. A., Reimer, B. and Mehler, B. (2014). Classifying driver workload using physiological and driving performance data: Two field studies. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 4057–4066.Google Scholar
- Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A. and Lavrakas, P. J. (2000). Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. Cambridge University Press. New York, USA, 223–252.Google Scholar