International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 853–858 | Cite as

Lifting Capability and Stress Analyses of the Crane System for a Large-Sized Tactical Wrecker

  • Kwonhee Suh
  • Hiseak Yoon


A large-sized tactical wrecker is a special-purpose vehicle that lifts and tows tactical vehicles and heavy loads. It consists of a crane, a post structure, outriggers and a suitable chassis truck, and during its initial design, the structural safety and tipping stability should be preemptively examined in terms of the layout of these components. This paper proposes computer-aided engineering (CAE) methods to evaluate the maximum lifting capacity of the wrecker and the structural safety of its crane during the initial design. The analytical model for the large-sized wrecker is constructed with 236 degrees of freedom by combining the crane system developed using the ADAMS macros with the dynamic model of large chassis truck with an axle suspension. The design parameters for the wrecker model that influence the tipping stability are selected, and then the maximum lifting loads with the corresponding changes are calculated. This parametric study shows that the characteristics of the boom and the layout of the outriggers greatly affect the maximum lifting capacity. Finite element (FE) analyses of the 1st stage boom and the 3rd stage boom show the stresses under the maximum overturning moment condition are within the allowable strength.

Key words

Tactical wrecker Crane Outrigger Tipping Maximum lifting load 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bathaee, K. and Gholami, M. (2016). Design process of change of functioning of a power shovel to a lattice boom crane of 300–ton capacity. SAE Paper No. 2016–01–8126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechtel Equipment Operations, Inc. (2002). Bechtel Rigging Handbook. 2nd edn. USA.Google Scholar
  3. Dassault Systèmes (2011). ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual 6.11. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Jang, I. G., Kim, K. S. and Kwak, B. M. (2014). Conceptual and basic designs of the Mobile Harbor crane based on topology and shape optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 50, 3, 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeng, S. L., Yang, C. F. and Chieng, W. H. (2010). Outrigger force measure for mobile crane safety based on linear programming optimization. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 38, 2, 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kiliçaslan, S., Balkan, T. and Ider, S. K. (1999). Tipping loads of mobile cranes with flexible booms. J. Sound and Vibration 223, 4, 645–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, J. W., Jung, S., Kim, J., Kim, J. and Seo, T. W. (2014). Optimal design of the front linkage of a hydraulic excavator for multi-objective function. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 28, 8, 3103–3111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. MSC Software (2010). Adams/Car Help - MSC Adams 2010. MSC Software Corporation, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Ramli, L., Mohamed, Z., Abdullahi, A. M., Jaafar, H. I. and Lazim, I. M. (2017). Control strategies for crane systems: A comprehensive review. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 95, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shaikh, A. A. and Dineesh, K. D. (2016). Lifting capacity enhancement of a crawler crane by improving stability. J. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 54, 1, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Suh, K. H. and Yoon, H. S. (2017a). Numerical investigations of the crosswind stability of the Korean light tactical vehicle during airlift. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 31, 3, 1067–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Suh, K. H. and Yoon, H. S. (2017b). Lightweight design of airlift provision for the Korean light tactical vehicle using approximate optimization. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 31, 12, 5929–5936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Suh, K. H., Song, B. G. and Yoon, H. S. (2016). Analytical method to develop airlift provision for Korean light tactical vehicle. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 30, 3, 1265–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Trąbka, A. (2016). Influence of flexibilities of cranes structural components on load trajectory. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 30, 1, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Viet, L. D. (2015). Crane sway reduction using Coriolis force produced by radial spring and damper. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 29, 3, 973–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yao, J., Xing, F., Fu, Y., Qiu, X., Zhou, Z. and Hou, J. (2017). Failure analysis of torsional buckling of all terrain crane telescopic boom section. Engineering Failure Analysis, 73, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Military Vehicle Development TeamKia Motors CorporationGwangjuKorea
  2. 2.School of Mechanical Systems EngineeringChonnam National UniversityGwangjuKorea

Personalised recommendations