Advertisement

International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 801–810 | Cite as

Investigation of Cavitation Process in Monotube Shock Absorber

  • Viktor Skrickij
  • Dzmitry Savitski
  • Valentin Ivanov
  • Paulius Skačkauskas
Article
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

The paper investigates cavitation effect which negatively influences the performance of a monotube shock absorber of road vehicle (passenger car). For better understanding of this phenomena, three physical models of shim stack valves are analyzed. Validation results allowed selecting the most appropriate valve model in presence of cavitation processes. A mathematical model of monotube damper with consideration of fluid compressibility and cavitation phenomena is developed. Simulation results are validated by experimental data obtained on hydraulic test rig. Based on the selected approach, a simplified method suitable for assessment of cavitation processes in automotive monotube shock absorbers is proposed. After investigation it is found that damping force when cavitation occurs mainly depends on the initial pressure and absorber inner diameter.

Key words

Monotube shock absorber Cavitation Mathematical modelling Shim stack 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, M. and Comas, A. (2006). Modelling a twin tube cavitating shock absorber. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 220, 8, 1031–1040.Google Scholar
  2. Alonso, M. and Comas, A. (2008). Thermal model of a twin-tube cavitating shock absorber. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 222, 11, 1955–1964.Google Scholar
  3. Audenino, A. L. and Belingardi, G. (1995). Modelling the dynamic behaviour of a motorcycle damper. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 209, 4, 249–262.Google Scholar
  4. Bouc, R. (1967). Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis. Proc. 4th Conf. Non-linear Oscillation, Prague, Czech Republic, 315–321.Google Scholar
  5. Bunthoff, J., Gauterin, F. and Boehm, C. (2015). Physical 1–D system simulation model for monotube shock absorbers for simulation with excitation up to 70 Hz. SAE Paper No. 2015–01–2353.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, Y., Guo, K., Yang, Y. and Zhuang, Y. (2012). Physical modeling of shock absorber using large deflection theory. SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars−Mechanical Systems 5, 1, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun, H. H., Kwon, S. J. and Talk, T. (2007). Reliability based design optimization of automotive suspension systems. Int. J. Automotive Technology 8, 6, 713–722.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, B. L., Choi, J. H. and Choi, D. H. (2004). Reliabilitybased design optimization of an automotive suspension system for enhancing kinematics and compliance characteristics. Int. J. Automotive Technology 6, 5, 235–242.Google Scholar
  9. Czop, P., Sławik, D., Śliwa, P. and Wszołek, G. (2009). Simplified and advanced models of a valve system used in shock absorbers. J. Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 33, 2, 173–180.Google Scholar
  10. Czop, P., Gasiorek, D., Ngaka, J., Sławik, D. and Wszołek, G. (2012). Fluid-structure simulation of a valve system used in hydraulic dampers. Modigliani Inzynierskie 45, 14, 197–205.Google Scholar
  11. Dominguez, A., Sedaghati, R. and Sitar, I. (2004). Modelling the hysteresis phenomenon of magnetorheological dampers. Smart Materials and Structures 13, 6, 1351–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farjoud, A., Ahmadian, M., Craft, M. and Burke, W. (2012). Nonlinear modeling and experimental characterization of hydraulic dampers: Effects of shim stack and orifice parameters on damper performance. Nonlinear Dynamics 67, 2, 1437–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchinson, J. R. (2000). Shear coefficients for timoshenko beam. Theory J. Applied Mechanics 68, 1, 87–92.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang, D. O., Heo, S. J., Kim, M. S., Choi, W. C. and Kim, I. H. (2012). Robust design optimization of suspension system by using target cascading method. Int. J. Automotive Technology 13, 1, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaneko, T. (1975). On Timoshenko’s correction for shear in vibrating beams. J. Physics D: Applied Physics 8, 16, 1927–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krahl, D. and Weber, J. (2016). Visualization of cavitation and investigation of cavitation erosion in a valve. 10th Int. Fluid Power Conf., 333–348.Google Scholar
  17. Lang, H. H. (1977). A Study of the Characteristics of Automotive Hydraulic Dampers at High Stroking Frequencies. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Michigan, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Lauwerys, X. (1998). Nonlinear Disc Stack Model for Valve Design. Intercompany Test and Analysis Report. Tenneco Automotive, Sint-Truiden, Belgium.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, K. (1997). Numerical modelling for the hydraulic performance prediction of automotive monotube dampers. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 28, 1, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo, F. and Zhang, X. (2014). A review of aeration and cavitation phenomena in the hydraulic shock absorber. Applied Mechanics and Materials 536, 537, 1369–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nguyen, M. Q., Canale, M., Sename, O. and Dugard, L. (2016). A model predictive approach for semi active suspension control problem of a full car. Proc. 55th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Las Vegas, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Reddy, B. S., Kumar, J. S., Reddy, C. E. and Reddy, K. V. K. (2014). Free vibration behaviour of functionally graded plates using higher-order shear deformation theory. J. Applied Science and Engineering 17, 3, 231–241.Google Scholar
  23. Pelosi, M., Subramanya, K. and Lantz, J. (2013). Investigation on the dynamic behavior of a solenoid hydraulic valve for automotive semi-active suspensions coupling 3D and 1D modelling. 13th Scandinavian Int. Conf. Fluid Power, SICFP2013, Linköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  24. Phu, N. M. and Lee, G. S. (2014). Characteristics of pressure and force considering friction in a closed cylinder with a holed piston. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 28, 6, 2409–2415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saidi, A. R., Rasouli, A. and Sahraee, S. (2009). Axisymmetric bending and buckling analysis of thick functionally graded circular plates using unconstrained third-order shear deformation plate theory. Composite Structures 89, 1, 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skačkauskas, P., Žuraulis, V., Vadluga, V. and Nagurnas, S. (2016). Development and verification of a shock absorber and its shim valve model based on the force method principles. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc -Maintenance and Reliability 19, 1, 126–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sławik, D., Czop, P., Król, A. and Wszołek, G. (2010). Optimization of hydraulic dampers with the use of design for six sigma methodology. J. Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 33, 2, 676–683.Google Scholar
  28. Talbott, M. and Starkey, J. (2002). An experimentally validated physical model of a high-performance monotube damper. SAE Paper No. 2002–01–3337.Google Scholar
  29. Thai, H. T. and Vo, T. P. (2013). A new sinusoidal shear deformation theory for bending, buckling, and vibration of functionally graded plates. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37, 5, 3269–3281.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Timoshenko, S. P. (1921). On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and J. Science 245, 41, 744–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Timoshenko, S. P. (1922). On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross-section. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and J. Science 253, 43, 125–131.Google Scholar
  32. Timoshenko, S. and Woinowsky-Krieger, S. (1959). Theory of Plates and Shells. 2nd edn. Mcgraw-Hill. New York, USA, 580.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Wen, Y. K. (1976). Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. J. Engineering Mechanics Division 102, 2, 249–263.Google Scholar
  34. Young, W. C. and Budynas, R. G. (2001). Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain. 7th edn. McGraw-Hill. New York, USA, 854.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viktor Skrickij
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dzmitry Savitski
    • 2
  • Valentin Ivanov
    • 2
  • Paulius Skačkauskas
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Transport EngineeringVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityVilniusLithuania
  2. 2.Automotive Engineering GroupTechnische Universität IlmenauIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations