Advertisement

International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 695–703 | Cite as

Hierarchical Direct Yaw-Moment Control System Design for In-Wheel Motor Driven Electric Vehicle

  • Shi Yue
  • Yu Fan
Article
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, a hierarchical structured direct yaw-moment control (DYC) system, which consists of a main-loop controller and a servo-loop controller, is designed to enhance the handling and stability of an in-wheel motor driven driven electric vehicle (IEV). In the main loop, a Fractional Order PID (FO-PID) controller is proposed to generate desired external yaw moment. A modified Differential Evolution (M-DE) algorithm is adopted to optimize the controller parameters. In the servo-loop controller, the desired external yaw moment is optimally distributed to individual wheel torques by using sequential quadratic programming (SQP) approach, with the tire force boundaries estimated by Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) based on a fitted empirical tire model. The IEV prototype is virtually modelled by using Adams/Car collaborating with SolidWorks, validated by track tests, and serves as the control plant for simulation. The feasibility and effectiveness of the designed control system are examined by simulations in typical handling maneuver scenarios.

Key Words

FO-PID control Vehicle stability control Unscented kalman filter Electric vehicle Torque allocation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, Y., Hedrick, J. K. and Guo, K. (2013). A novel direct yaw moment controller for in-wheel motor electric vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 51, 6, 925–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goodarzi, A. and Esmailzadeh, E. (2007). Design of a VDC system for all-wheel independent drive vehicles. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 12, 6, 632–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haykin, S. S. (2001). Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks. John Wiley & Sons. New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hori, Y. (2004). Future vehicle driven by electricity and control-research on four-wheel-motored ‘UOT electric March II’. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 51, 5, 654–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Julier, S., Uhlmann, J. and Durrant-Whyte, H. F. (2000). A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 45, 3, 477–482MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Kandepu, R., Foss, B. and Imsland, L. (2008). Applying the unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear state estimation. J. Process Control 18, 7–8, 753–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kazantzis, N. and Kravaris, C. (1997). System-theoretic properties of sampled-data representations of nonlinear systems obtained via Taylor-Lie series. Int. J. Control 67, 6, 997–1020MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Kazantzis, N. and Kravaris, C. (1999). Time-discretization of nonlinear control systems via Taylor methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering 23, 6, 763–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, D., Du, S. and Yu, F. (2008). Integrated vehicle chassis control based on direct yaw moment, active steering and active stabiliser. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 46 Supplement 1, 341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nam, K., Fujimoto, H. and Hori, Y. (2014). Design of an adaptive sliding mode controller for robust yaw stabilisation of in-wheel-motor-driven electric vehicles. Int. J. Vehicle Design 67, 1, 98–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Osborn, R. P. and Shim, T. (2004). Independent control of all-wheel-drive torque distribution. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 44, 7, 529–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oustaloup, A., Levron, F., Mathieu, B. and Nanot, F. M. (2000). Frequency-band complex noninteger differentiator: characterization and synthesis. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications 47, 1, 25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shi, Y., Lu, H. and Yu, F. (2016). Handling and stability control for an in-wheel-motor-driven electric vehicle. Proc. Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC'16), 249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shi, Y., Liu, Q. and Yu, F. (2017). Design of an adaptive FO-PID controller for an in-wheel-motor driven electric vehicle. SAE Paper No. 2017–01-0427Google Scholar
  15. Storn, R. and Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution–A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optimization 11, 4, 341–359MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Vinagre, B., Monje, C., Calderón, A. and Suárez, J. (2007). Fractional PID controllers for industry application. A brief introduction. J. Vibration and Control 13, 9–10, 1419–1429zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Wan, E. A. and Van Der Merwe, R. (2000). The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. Proc. IEEE Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symp., 153–158Google Scholar
  18. Xiong, L., Yu, Z., Wang, Y., Yang, C. and Meng, Y. (2012). Vehicle dynamics control of four in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle using gain scheduling based on tyre cornering stiffness estimation. Vehicle System Dynamics: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 50, 6, 831–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xue, D., Zhao, C. and Chen, Y. (2006). A modified approximation method of fractional order system. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Mechatronics and Automation, 1043–1048Google Scholar
  20. Yin, D. and Hu, J. S. (2014). Active approach to electronic stability control for front-wheel drive in-wheel motor electric vehicles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 6, 979–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations