Advertisement

International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 659–668 | Cite as

Path Tracking for Autonomous Race Car Based on G-G Diagram

  • Miaomiao Fu
  • Jun Ni
  • Xueyuan Li
  • Jibin Hu
Article
  • 201 Downloads

Abstract

Currently, the autonomous driving technique is attracting increasing research focus from all over the world. Generally, the control systems of an autonomous vehicle include environment perception, path planning and path tracking control systems. In this paper, the path tracking control issue of the autonomous vehicle will be focused on. Few of the previous proposed path tracking controllers consider the vehicle driving and handling limit, which degenerates the potential of the autonomous vehicle to finish the desired path as quick as possible. To this end, this paper proposes a path tracking controller for autonomous vehicle, which aims at pushing it to the driving and handling limit. The limit dynamic performance of the autonomous vehicle is represented by the G-G diagram, which indicates the acceleration capability of the autonomous vehicle. The G-G diagram is obtained by phase portrait method and it is validated by a modified FSAE racing car. Finally, a path tracking controller based on the G-G diagram is proposed. The simulation validation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed controller.

Key Words

Autonomous vehicle Path tracking Race car Nonlinear dynamics G-G diagram Control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chaichaowarat, R. and Wannasuphprasit, W. (2016). Fullslip kinematics based estimation of vehicle yaw rate from differential wheel speeds. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 1, 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chung, S. and Lee, H. (2016). Vehicle sideslip estimation and compensation for banked road. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 1, 63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Funke, J., Theodosis, P., Hindiyeh, R., Staned, G., Kritatakirana, K., Gerdes, C., Langer, D., Hernandez, M., Müller-Bessler, B. and Huhnke, B. (2012). Up to the limits: Autonomous Audi TTS. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symp. (IV), Alcala de Henares, Spain.Google Scholar
  4. Hang, P., Chen, X., Fang, S. and Luo, F. (2017). Robust control for four-wheel-independent-steering electric vehicle with steer-by-wire system. Int. J. Automotive Technology 18, 5, 785–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hattori, Y., Ono, E. and Hosoe, S. (2006). Optimum vehicle trajectory control for obstacle avoidance problem. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 11, 5, 507–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ingemar, J. C. (1991). Blanche-an experiment in guidance and navigation of an autonomous robust vehicle. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 7, 2, 193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jun, N., Jibin, H., Xueyuan, L., Bin, X. and Junjie, Z. (2016). G-G diagram generation based on phase plane method and experimental validation for FSAE race car. SAE Paper No. 2016–01-0174Google Scholar
  8. Kapania, R. N. and Gerdes, J. C. (2015). Design of a feedback-feedforward steering controller for accurate path tracking and stability at the limit of handling. Vehicle System Dynamic: Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 53, 12, 1687–1704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kasprzak, M. E. and Gentz, D. (2006). The formula SAE tire test consortium-tire testing and data handling. SAE Paper No. 2006–01-3606Google Scholar
  10. Katzourakis, D. I., Velenis, E. and Holweg, E. (2014). Haptic steering support for driving near the vehicle’s handing limits; skid-pad case. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 1, 151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kritayakirana, K. and Gerdes, J. C. (2012). Autonomous vehicle control at the limits of handling. Vehicle Autonomous System 10, 4, 271–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kritayakirana, K. (2012). Autonomous Vehicle Control at the Limits of Handling. Ph. D. Dissertation. Stanford University. Stanford, California, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Kritayakirana, K. and Gerdes, J. C. (2010). Autonomous cornering at the limits: Maximizing a “g-g” diagram by using feedforward trail-braking and throttle-on-exit. IFAC Symp. Advances in Automotive Control, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, D. H., Kim, S. D. and Kim, C. S. (2014). Development of autonomous braking system using the predicted stopping distance. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 2, 341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lenzo, B., Sorniotti, A., Gruber, P. and Sannen, K. (2017). On the experimental analysis of single input single output control of yaw rate and sideslip angle. Int. J. Automotive Technology 18, 5, 799–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, Y., He, L. and Yang, L. (2014). Path following control of nonholonomic constraint multi-axle travel vehicle. J. Mechanical Engineering 5, 33, 33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, Z. and Payre, G. (2007). Global bifurcation analysis of a nonlinear road vehicle system. J. Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 4, 2, 308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maclaurin, B. (2011). A skid steering model using the magic formula. J. Terramechanics 48, 4, 247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milliken, F. W. and Milliken, L. D. (1996). Race Car Vehicle Dynamics. SAE International. Warrendale, Pennsylvnia, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Pacejka, H. B. (2012). Tire and Dynamics. 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann. Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Paolo, F., Francesco, B., Jahan, A., Hontei, E. T. and Davor, H. (2007). Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 15, 3, 566–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Russell, T. I. and Tamas, K. N. (2011). Equilibrium, stability, and dynamics of rectangular liquid-filled vessels. J. Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 4, 6, 041012Google Scholar
  23. Sebastian, T., Mike, M. and Hendrik, D. (2006). Stanley: The robot that won the Darpa Grand Challenge. J. Field Robotics 23, 9, 661–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shimoda, S., Kuroda, Y. and Iagnemma, K. (2007). Highspeed navigation of unmanned ground vehicles on uneven terrain using potential fields. Robotica 25, 4, 409–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spenko, M., Kuroda, Y., Dubowsky, S. and Iagnemma, K. (2006). Hazard avoidance for high speed unmanned ground vehicles in rough terrain. J. Field Robotics 23, 5, 311–331CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Steven, C. P., James, E. B. and Karl, I. (2010). Stabilizing a vehicle near rollover: An analogy to cart-pole stabilization. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, Alaska, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Velenis, E., Frazzoli, E. and Tsiotras, P. (2010). Steadystate cornering equilibria and stabilization for a vehicle during extreme operating condition. Int. J. Vehicle Autonomous Systems 8, 2–4, 217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vincent, N., Gregory, S. and Balakumar, B. (2009). Lateral load transfer effects on bifurcation behavior of fourwheel vehicle system. J. Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 4, 4, 041007–1–041007-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang, J. and Coughlin, J. F. (2014). I-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and chanllenges for aging drivers. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 2, 333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang, X. Z., Wei, K. X. and Yuan, X. F. (2016). Optimal torque distrubution for the stability improbement of a four-wheel distributed-driven electric vehicle using coordinated control. J. Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics 11, 5, 051017–1–051017-11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhai, L., Sun, T. M., Wang, Q. N. and Wang, J. (2017). Lateral stability control of dynamic steering for dual motor drive high speed tracked vehicle. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 6, 1079–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Key Lab of Vehicle TransmissionBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations