Design and Evaluation of Robust Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Systems in Parameter Space
- 120 Downloads
This paper is on the design of cooperative adaptive cruise control systems for automated driving of platoons of vehicles in the longitudinal direction. Longitudinal models of vehicles with simple dynamics, an uncertain first order time constant and vehicle to vehicle communication with a communication delay are used in the vehicle modeling. A robust parameter space approach is developed and applied to the design of the cooperative adaptive cruise control system. D-stability is chosen as the robust performance goal and the feedback PD controller is designed in controller parameter space to achieve this D-stability goal for a range of possible longitudinal dynamics time constants and different values of time gap. Preceding vehicle acceleration is sent to the ego vehicle using vehicle to vehicle communication and a feedforward controller is used in this inter-vehicle loop to improve performance. Simulation results of an eight vehicle platoon of heterogeneous vehicles are presented and evaluated to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed design method. Also, the proposed method is compared with a benchmark controller and the feedback only controller. Time gap regulation and string stability are used to assess performance and the effect of the vehicle to vehicle communication frequency on control system performance is also investigated.
Key WordsCooperative adaptive cruise control Parameter space control system design D-stability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aksun Güvenç, B. and Kural, E. (2006). Adaptive cruise control simulator: A low-cost, multiple-driver-in-theloop simulator. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 42–55.Google Scholar
- Bu, F., Tan, H.-S. and Huang, J. (2010). Design and field testing of a cooperative adaptive cruise control system. American Control Conf. (ACC), IEEE, Baltimore, MD, USA.Google Scholar
- Choi, S. and Hedrick, J. K. (1995). Vehicle longitudinal control using an adaptive observer for automated highway systems. American Control Conf. (ACC), IEEE, Seattle,Washington, USA, 3106–3110.Google Scholar
- Dey, K. C., Yan, L., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Shen, H., Chowdhury, M., Yu, L., Qui, C. and Soundararaj, V. (2016). A review of communication, driver characteristics, and controls aspects of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC). IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 2, 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Güvenç, L., Uygan, İ. M. C., Kahraman, K., Karaahmetoğlu, R., Altay, İ., Şentürk, M., Emirler, M. T., Hartavi Karcı, A. E., Aksun Güvenç, B., Altuğ, E., Turan, M. C., Taş, Ö. Ş., Bozkurt, E., Özgüner, Ü., Redmill, K., Kurt, A. and Efendioğlu, B. (2012). Cooperative adaptive cruise control implementation of team mekar at the grand cooperative driving challenge. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 13, 3, 1062–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kural, E. (2006). Adaptive Cruise Control Design. M. S. Thesis. Istanbul Technical University. Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
- Maschuw, J. P., Keßler, G. C. and Abel, D. (2008). LMI-based control of vehicle platoons for robust longitudinal guidance. Proc. 17th IFAC World Cong., 12111–12116.Google Scholar
- Trudgen, M. and Mohammadpour, J. (2015). Robust cooperative adaptive cruise control design for connected vehicles. Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conf., Columbus, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
- Yanakiev, D., Eyre, J. and Kanellakopoulos, I. (1998). Longitudinal Control of Heavy Duty Vehicles: Experimental Evaluation. California PATH Research Report, UCB-ITS-PRR-98-15.Google Scholar