Design Optimization of a Rear Independent Suspension for the Korean Light Tactical Vehicle

  • Kwonhee Suh
  • Hiseak Yoon


Steering and suspension handle the direction of a vehicle according to the driver’s intentions and control the disturbance from the road surface while supporting the vehicle body. The static and dynamic characteristics of two systems are critical factors for the ride comfort and the directional stability. In the layout stage, the hard points of steering and suspension systems are determined. In the next design stage, the detailed design of the system, including gearboxes, springs, shock absorbers, and control links, is carried out. While the optimal hard points of a suspension are determined at the precedent design, interference with other peripheral components should be carefully examined in the detailed design process. In the case of the design point change should be made to avoid the interference, subsequent position and shape changes of the link mechanism are required. Therefore, there is a need to examine the optimization of suspension compliance characteristics with chassis design changes and the durability performance of the modified design. This study proposes an integrated analysis method for the design optimization and the durability evaluation of such optimized design specifications of the rear independent suspension for a military vehicle.

Key Words

Tactical vehicle Independent suspension Kriging model CMA-ES Durability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chen, S., Shi, T., Wang, D. and Chen, J. (2015). Multi-objective optimization of the vehicle ride comfort based on Kriging approximate model and NSGA-II. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 29, 3, 1007–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choi, B. L., Choi, D. H., Kim, H. and Lee, H. (2008). An integrated chassis design procedure using the PIDO technology. SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0884.Google Scholar
  3. Dassault Systèmes (2011). ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual 6.11. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. Providence, RI, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Datoussaid, S., Verlinden, O. and Conti, C. (2002). Application of evolutionary strategies to optimal design of multibody systems. Multibody System Dynamics 8, 4, 393–408.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Elsayed, K. and Lacor, C. (2014). Robust parameter design optimization using Kriging, RBF and RBFNN with gradient-based and evolutionary optimization techniques. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 236, 325–344.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Fang, J., Gao, Y., Sun, G., Xu, C. and Li, Q. (2014). Fatigue optimization with combined ensembles of surrogate modeling for a truck cab. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 28, 11, 4641–4649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forrester, A. I. J. and Keane, A. J. (2009). Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 45, 1–3, 50–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gauchia, A., Diaz, V., Boada, M. J. L. and Boada, B. L. (2010). Torsional stiffness and weight optimization of a real bus structure. Int. J. Automotive Technology 11, 1, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen, N. and Ostermeier, A. (2001). Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation 9, 2, 159–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harzheim, L. and Warnecke, U. (2010). Robustness optimization of the position of an anti-roll bar link to avoid the toggling of a rear axle stabilizer. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 42, 2, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HyperWorks (2016). Altair Engineering Inc. Google Scholar
  12. Igel, C., Hansen, N. and Roth, S. (2007). Covariance matrix adaptation for multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation 15, 1, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang, G. J., Park, C. H. and Choi, D. H. (2016). Metamodel-based design optimization of injection molding process variables and gates of an automotive glove box for enhancing its quality. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 30, 4, 1723–1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, J. K., Kim, Y. J., Yang, W. H., Park, Y. C. and Lee, K. H. (2011). Structural design of an outer tie rod for a passenger car. Int. J. Automotive Technology 12, 3, 375–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, M. S., Kang, D. O. and Heo, S. J. (2014). Innovative design optimization strategy for the automotive industry. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 2, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2017). Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review. European J. Operational Research 256, 1, 1–16.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MSC Software (2010). Adams/Car Help - MSC Adams 2010. MSC Software Corporation. CA, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Mullur, A. A. and Messac, A. (2006). Metamodeling using extended radial basis functions: A comparative approach. Engineering with Computers 21, 3, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paluskar, P. and Vaidya, R. (2011). Taguchi method (DOE) based performance optimization of a three link rigid axle passenger car suspension using MBD simulations. SAE Paper No. 2011-01-0734.Google Scholar
  20. Park, J. H., Kim, K. J., Lee, J. W. and Yoon, J. K. (2015). Light-weight design of automotive suspension link based on design of experiment. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 1, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. PIDOTECH (2017). Practical Design Techniques Theory Manual. PIDOTECH Inc. Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  22. Safe Technology (2011). Fe-safe 6 User Manual. Safe Technology Limited. Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Sancibrian, R., Garcia, P., Viadero, F., Fernandez, A. and De-Juan, A. (2010). Kinematic design of double-wishbone suspension systems using a multiobjective optimization approach. Vehicle System Dynamics 48, 7, 793–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simpson, T. W., Toropov, V., Balabanov, V. and Viana F. A. C. (2008). Design and analysis of computer experiments in multidisciplinary design optimization: A review of how far we have come-or not. 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conf., 5802–5823.Google Scholar
  25. Song, X. G., Jung, J. H., Son, H. J., Park, J. H., Lee, K. H. and Park, Y. C. (2010). Metamodel-based optimization of a control arm considering strength and durability performance. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 60, 4, 976–980.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Suh, K. H. and Song, B. G. (2015). Light-weight design of a Korean light tactical vehicle using optimization technique. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 23, 3, 336–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Suh, K. H. and Yoon, H. S. (2017). Numerical investigations of the crosswind stability of the Korean light tactical vehicle during airlift. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 31, 3, 1067–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suh, K. H., Song, B. G. and Yoon, H. S. (2016). Analytical method to develop airlift equipment for Korean light tactical vehicle. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 30, 3, 1265–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, W., Pei, J., Yuan, S., Zhang, J., Yuan, J. and Xu, C. (2016). Application of different surrogate models on the optimization of centrifugal pump. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 30, 2, 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yi, Y. S., Park, J. H. and Hong, K. J. (2014). Design optimization of suspension kinematic and compliance characteristics. SAE Paper No. 2014-01-0394.Google Scholar
  31. Zhang, M., Gou, W., Li, L., Yang, F. and Yue, Z. (2017). Multidisciplinary design and multi-objective optimization on guide fins of twin-web disk using Kriging surrogate model. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 55, 1, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang, Y., Tang, C., Chen, W., Chen, L. and Yang, J. (2008). Robust optimal design for enhancing vehicle handling performance. SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars 1, 1, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Military Vehicle Development TeamKia Motors CorporationGwangjuKorea
  2. 2.School of Mechanical Systems EngineeringChonnam National UniversityGwangjuKorea

Personalised recommendations