International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 135–146 | Cite as

Dynamics characteristics analysis and control of FWID EV

  • Dongmei Wu
  • Haitao Ding
  • Changqing Du


Compared with internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, four-wheel-independently-drive electric vehicles (FWID EV) have significant advantages, such as more controlled degree of freedom (DOF), higher energy efficiency and faster torque response of an electric motor. The influence of these advantages and other characteristics on vehicle dynamics control need to be evaluated in detail. This paper firstly analyzed the dynamics characteristics of FWID EV, including the feasible region of vehicle global force, the improvement of powertrain energy efficiency and the time-delays of electric motor torque in the direct yaw moment feedback control system. In this way, the influence of electric motor output power limit, road friction coefficient and the wheel torque response on the stability control, as well as the impact of motor idle loss on the torque distribution method were illustrated clearly. Then a vehicle dynamics control method based on the vehicle stability state was proposed. In normal driving condition, the powertrain energy efficiency can be improved by torque distribution between front and rear wheels. In extreme driving condition, the electric motors combined with the electro-hydraulic braking system were employed as actuators for direct yaw moment control. Simulation results show that dynamics control which take full advantages of the more controlled freedom and the motor torque response characteristics improve the vehicle stability better than the control based on the hydraulic braking system of conventional vehicle. Furthermore, some road tests in a real vehicle were conducted to evaluate the performance of proposed control method.


Four-wheel-independently-drive electric vehicles (FWID EV) Dynamics characteristics Powertrain energy efficiency Vehicle stability, Dynamics control 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chen, Y. and Wang, J. (2011). Fast and global optimal energy-efficient control allocation with applications to over-actuated electric ground vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 20, 5, 1202–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, Y. and Wang, J. (2014). Design and experimental evaluations on energy efficient control allocation methods for overactuated electric vehicles: Longitudinal motion case. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 19, 2, 538–548.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dizqah, A. M., Lenzo, B., Sorniotti, A., Gruber, P., Fallah, S. and Smet, D. (2016). A fast and parametric torque distribution strategy for four-wheel-drive energy-efficient electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 63, 7, 4367–4376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Emırler, M. T., Kahraman, K., Şentürk, M., Acar, O. U., Güvenç Aksun, B., Güvenç, L. and Efendıoğlu, B. (2015). Lateral stability control of fully electric vehicles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 2, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hac, A. and Simpson, M. (2000). Estimation of vehicle sideslip angle and yaw rate. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0696.Google Scholar
  6. Hori, Y. (2004). Future vehicle driven by electricity and control-research on four wheel motored “UOT Electric March II”. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 51, 5, 954–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hu, J. S., Wang, Y., Fujimoto, H. and Hori, Y. (2017). Robust yaw stability control for in-wheel motor electric vehicles. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 22, 3, 1360–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ivanov, V., Savitski, D., Augsburg, K., Barber, P., Knauder, B. and Zehetner, J. (2015). Wheel slip control for allwheel drive electric vehicle with compensation of road disturbances. J. Terramechanics, 61, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johansen, T. A. and Fossen, T. I. (2013). Control allocation–A survey. Automatica 49, 5, 1087–1103.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonasson, M., Andreasson, J., Jacobson, B. and Trigell, A. S. (2010). Global force potential of over-actuated vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics, Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 48, 9, 983–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jonasson, M., Andreasson, J., Solyom, S., Jacobson, B. and Trigell, A. S. (2011). Utilization of actuators to improve vehicle stability at the limit: From hydraulic brakes toward electric propulsion. J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 133, 5, 502–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sawase, K. and Ushiroda, Y. (2008). Improvement of vehicle dynamics by right-and-left torque vectoring system in various drivetrains. Mitsubishi Technical Review 2008, 2, 14–20.Google Scholar
  13. Keiji, I. (1989). Effects on cornering characteristics by driven-force control. J. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan 43, 4, 67–73.Google Scholar
  14. Keiji, I. (1990). Technical trends of driving-force control technology. J. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan 44, 1, 76–84.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, H., Lee, S. and Hedrick, J. K. (2015). Active yaw control for handling performance improvement by using traction force. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 3, 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, W., Yi, K. and Lee, J. (2012). An optimal traction, braking, and steering coordination strategy for stability and manoeuvrability of a six-wheel drive and six-wheel steer vehicle. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 226, 1, 3–22.Google Scholar
  17. Klomp, M. (2011). Longitudinal force distribution using quadratically constrained linear programming. Vehicle System Dynamics, Int. J. Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility 49, 12, 1823–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ko, S., Song, C. and Kim, H. (2016). Cooperative control of the motor and the electric booster brake to improve the stability of an in-wheel electric vehicle. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 3, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, C. and Xu, Z. (2015). Wheel torque distribution of four-wheel-drive electric vehicles based on multiobjective optimization. Energies 8, 5, 3815–3831.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu, D., Gu, J., Li, J., Ouyang, M. and Ma, Y. (2009). Highperformance control of PMSM based on a new forecast algorithm with only low-resolution position sensor. Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conf., IEEE, 1440–1444.Google Scholar
  21. Lv, C., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Sun, D. and Yuan, Y. (2014). Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of pressure-differencelimiting modulation of the hydraulic brake for regenerative braking control of electric vehicles. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 228, 6, 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lv, C., Zhang, J., Li, Y. and Yuan, Y. (2015). Mechanism analysis and evaluation methodology of regenerative braking contribution to energy efficiency improvement of electrified vehicles. Energy Conversion and Management, 92, 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lv, C., Wang, H. and Cao, D. (2017). High-precision hydraulic pressure control based on linear pressure-drop modulation in valve critical equilibrium state. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, 99, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. NHTSA (2007). Electronic Stability Control Systems. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 126.Google Scholar
  25. Novellis, L. D., Sorniotti, A. and Gruber, P. (2014). Wheel torque distribution criteria for electric vehicles with torque-vectoring differentials. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 63, 4, 1593–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogata, K. (2009). Modern Control Engineering. 5th edn. Pearson Custom Publishing. Boston, USA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Park, J., Jeong, H., Jang, I. and Hwang, S. H. (2015). Torque distribution algorithm for an independently driven electric vehicle using a fuzzy control method. Energies 8, 8, 8537–8561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phanomchoeng, G., Rajamani, R. and Piyabongkarn, D. (2011). Nonlinear observer for bounded jacobian systems, with applications to automotive slip angle estimation. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 56, 5, 1163–1170.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Piyabongkarn, D., Rajamani, R., Grogg, J. A. and Lew, J. Y. (2009). Development and experimental evaluation of a slip angle estimator for vehicle stability control. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 17, 1, 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shuai, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, J., Li, J. and Ouyang, M. (2014). Lateral motion control for four-wheel-independent-drive electric vehicles using optimal torque allocation and dynamic message priority scheduling. Control Engineering Practice, 24, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, Y., Nguyen, B. M., Fujimoto, H. and Hori, Y. (2014). Multirate estimation and control of body slip angle for electric vehicles based on onboard vision system. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 61, 2, 1133–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu, D., Ding, H., Guo, K. and Wang, Z. (2014). Experimental research on the pressure following control of electro-hydraulic braking system. SAE Paper No. 2014-01-0848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiong, L., Teng, G. W., Yu, Z. P., Zhang, W. X. and Feng, Y. (2016). Novel stability control strategy for distributed drive electric vehicle based on driver operation intention. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 4, 651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yim, S. (2017). Coordinated control of ESC and AFS with adaptive algorithms. Int. J. Automotive Technology 18, 2, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yin, D. and Hu, J. S. (2014). Active approach to electronic stability control for front-wheel drive in-wheel motor electric vehicles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 6, 979–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yin, G., Wang, R. and Wang, J. (2015). Robust control for four wheel independently-actuated electric ground vehicles by external yaw-moment generation. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 5, 839–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoon, J. H. and Peng, H. (2014). A cost-effective sideslip estimation method using velocity measurements from two GPS receivers. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 63, 6, 2589–2599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu, N. and Gong, Y. M. (2008). High dynamic performance speed control strategy of high density IPMSM for HEV application. Intelligent Control and Automation, 7th World Cong., 1588–1593.Google Scholar
  39. Yu, Z., Yang, P. and Xiong, L. (2014). Application of control allocation in distributed drive electric vehicle. J. Mechanical Engineering, 18, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao, H., Ren, B., Chen, H. and Deng, W. (2015). Model predictive control allocation for stability improvement of four-wheel drive electric vehicles in critical driving condition. IET Control Theory & Applications 9, 18, 2688–2696.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and ControlJilin UniversityChangchunChina
  2. 2.Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology of Automotive ComponentsWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  3. 3.Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components TechnologyWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations