International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 55–62 | Cite as

Allocation control algorithms design and comparison based on distributed drive electric vehicles

  • Bo Leng
  • Lu Xiong
  • Zhuoping Yu
  • Tong Zou


For a distributed drive electric vehicle (DDEV) which is equipped with redundant actuators, allocation control is a key technique. Three different allocation control algorithms are designated with fixed efficiency matrix, dynamic efficiency matrix, and direct yaw moment distribution, respectively. All these algorithms are applied in a vehicle stability control system with hierarchical control structure and evaluated from three aspects, namely, control precision, real-time characteristics, and control energy. Comparison results demonstrate that the algorithm with dynamic efficiency matrix has the best comprehensive performance, which is also validated in field tests based on a DDEV equipped with four motors.


Allocation control Efficiency matrix Stability control Distributed drive electric vehicle 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bolender, M. A. and Doman, D. B. (2004). Nonlinear control allocation using piecewise linear functions. J. Guidance Control and Dynamics 27, 6, 1017–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. GB/T 6323-2014 Controllability and Stability Test Procedure for Automobile (2014}). Scholar
  3. Haarkegard, O. (2002). Efficient Active Set Algorithms for Solving Constrained Least Squares Problems in Aircraft Control Allocation. Linkopings University. Sweden Technical Report. LiTH-ISY-R-2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. He, P. and Hori, Y. (2006). Optimum traction force distribution for stability improvement of 4WD EV in critical driving condition. IEEE Int. Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 596–601.Google Scholar
  5. Hori, Y. (2004). Future vehicle driven by electricity and control-research on four wheel motored “UOT electric march II”. Industrial Electronics IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 51, 5, 954–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ISO 3888-1 (1999). Passenger Cars–Test Track for a Severe Lane-change Manoeuvre–Part 1: Double Lane-Change. Scholar
  7. Jin, C., Xiong, L. and Yang, P. (2012). A control allocation algorithm for in-wheel-motor driven vehicle with coupling tire characteristics. Proc. 12th Int. Symp. Advanced Vehicle Control, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  8. Kobayashi, T., Sugiura, H., Ono, E., Katsuyama, E. and Yamamoto, M. (2016). Efficient direct yaw moment control of in-wheel motor vehicle. Proc. 13th Int. Symp. Advanced Vehicle Control, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Leonardo, De N., Aldo, S. and Patrick, G. (2013). Optimal wheel torque distribution for a four-wheel-drive fully electric vehicle. SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars-Mechanical System 6, 1, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li, B., Goodarzi, A., Khajepour, A., Chen, S. and Litkouhi, B. (2015). An optimal torque distribution control strategy for four-independent wheel drive electric vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 53, 8, 1172–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, S. and Arat, M. A. (2016). A hierarchical integrated chassis control strategy based on wheel force feedback. Int. J. Vehicle Performance 2, 4, 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mokhiamar, O. and Abe, M. (2004a). Effects of an optimum cooperative chassis control from the viewpoint of tire workload. Trans. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan 35, 3, 215–221.Google Scholar
  13. Mokhiamar, O. and Abe, M. (2004b). Simultaneous optimal distribution of lateral and longitudinal tire forces for the model following control. J. Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control 126, 4, 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ono, E., Hattori, Y., Muragishi, Y. and Koibuchi, K. (2006). Vehicle dynamics integrated control for four-wheeldistributed steering and four-wheel-distributed traction/braking systems. Vehicle System Dynamics 44, 2, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schofield, B. and Haegglund, T. (2008). Optimal control allocation in vehicle dynamics control for rollover mitigation. American Control Conf., Seattle, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Song, P., Tomizuka, M. and Zong, C. (2015). A novel integrated chassis controller for full drive-by-wire vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 53, 2, 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Suzuki, Y., Kano, Y. and Abe, M. (2014). A study on tyre force distribution controls for full drive-by-wire electric vehicle. Vehicle System Dynamics 52, Supplement 1, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. U.S. DOT/NHTSA–Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards–Electronic Stability Control Systems (2006}). Scholar
  19. U.S. DOT/NHTSA–Laboratory Test Procedure for Dynamic Rollover–The Fishhook Maneuver Test Procedure–New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) (2013}). Scholar
  20. Xiong, L., Teng, G., Yu, Z. and Zhang, W. (2016). Novel stability control strategy for distributed drive electric vehicle based on driver operation intention. Int. J. Automotive Technology 17, 4, 651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yin, G., Wang, J. and Pi, D. (2013). Torque distribution control for independent wheel drive electric vehicles with varying vertical load. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 255, 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu, Z., Feng, Y. and Xiong, L. (2013). Review on vehicle dynamics control of distributed drive electric vehicle. Chinese J. Mechanical Engineering 49, 8, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu, Z., Leng, B., Xiong, L., Feng, Y. and Shi, F. (2016). Direct yaw moment control for distributed drive electric vehicle handling performance improvement. Chinese J. Mechanical Engineering 29, 3, 486–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Automotive StudiesTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.National ‘2011’ Collaborative Innovation CenterTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Technical CentreSAIC MotorShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations