International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 959–971 | Cite as

Comparative investigation on the aerodynamic effects of combined use of underbody drag reduction devices applied to real sedan

  • Junho Cho
  • Tae-Kyung Kim
  • Kyu-Hong Kim
  • Kwanjung Yee


To reduce the aerodynamic drag, the performance of the underbody aerodynamic drag reduction devices was evaluated based on the actual shape of a sedan-type vehicle. An undercover, under-fin, and side air dam were used as the underbody aerodynamic drag reduction devices. In addition, the effects of the interactions based on the combination of the aerodynamic drag reduction devices were investigated. A commercial sedan-type vehicle was selected as a reference model and its shape was modeled in detail. Aerodynamic drag was analyzed by computational fluid dynamics at a general driving speed on highway of 120 km/h. The undercover reduced the slipstream area through the attenuation of the longitudinal vortex pair by enhancing the up-wash of underflow, thereby reducing the aerodynamic drag by 8.4 %. The under-fin and side air dam showed no reduction in aerodynamic drag when they were solely attached to the actual complex shape of the underbody. Simple aggregation of the effects of aerodynamic drag reduction by the individual device did not provide the accurate performance of the combined aerodynamic drag reduction devices. An additional aerodynamic drag reduction of 2.1 % on average was obtained compared to the expected drag reduction, which was due to the synergy effect of the combination.

Key words

Computational fluid dynamics Aerodynamic drag Underbody drag reduction device Undercover Under-fin Side air dam 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ANSYS, Inc. (2010). ANSYS. Fluent 13.0 User’s Guide.Google Scholar
  2. Buchheim, R., Leie, B. and Luckoff, H. J. (1983). Der Neue Audi 100-Ein Beispiel für Konsequente Aerodynamische Personenwagen-Entwicklung. ATZ, 85, 419–425.Google Scholar
  3. Cogotti, A. (1989). A strategy for optimum surveys of passenger-car flow fields. SAE Paper No. 890374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubief, Y. and Delcayre, F. (2000). On coherent-vortex identification in turbulence. J. Turbulence, 1, 1–22.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Heft, A., Indinger, T. and Adams, N. (2012). Introduction of a new realistic generic car model for aerodynamic investigations. SAE Paper No. 2012-01-0168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hu, X., Zhang, R., Ye, J., Yan, X. and Zhao, Z. (2011). Influence of different diffuser angle on Sedan’s aerodynamic characteristics. Proc. Int. Conf. Physics Science and Technology, 239–245.Google Scholar
  7. Hucho, W. H. (1998). Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles. 4th edn. SAE International. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Huminic, A. and Huminic, G. (2012). Numerical flow simulation for a generic vehicle body on wheels with variable underbody diffuser. SAE Paper No. 2012-01-0172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kang, S., Cho, J., Jun, S., Park, H., Song, K., Kim, K. and Lee, D. (2012). A study of an active rear diffuser device for aerodynamic drag reduction of automobiles. SAE Paper No. 2012-01-0173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim, T. K., Choi, J. K., Kim, J. H., Cho, J. H., Lee, Y. B., Kim, K. H., Lee, D. H., Kim, J. P. and Lee, J. H. (2012). Numerical simulation of flows and aerodynamic drag with active air flap in 3-dimensional engine room. Spring Conf. Proc., Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 452–462.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, T. K., Jeong, S. M., Choi, J. K., Kim, K. H., Kim, J. P. and Lee, J. Y. (2013a). Parametric study of aerodynamic drag reduction devices for aerodynamic drag reduction of sedan (1): Undercover and under fin. Spring Conf. Proc., Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 1500–1508.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, T. K., Jeong, S. M., Choi, J. K., Kim, K. H., Kim, J. P. and Kim, K. Y. (2013b). Parametric study of aerodynamic drag reduction devices for aerodynamic drag reduction of sedan (2): Side air dam. Spring Conf. Proc., Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 1509–1518.Google Scholar
  13. Kumar, A., Singh, A. and Regin, A. F. (2015). Study on effect of ground clearance on performance of aerodynamic drag reduction devices for passenger vehicle using CFD simulations. SAE Paper No. 2015-26-0197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwak, M., Lee, Y., Kwon, H., Kim, K. and Lee, D. H. (2013). Optimum nose shape of a front-rear symmetric train for the reduction of the total aerodynamic drag. J. Mechanical Science and Technology 27, 12, 3733–3743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Le Good, G. M., Passmore, M. A. and Cogotti, A. (1998). A comparison of on-road aerodynamic drag measurements with wind tunnel data from Pininfarina and MIRA. SAE Paper No. 980394.Google Scholar
  16. Levin, J. and Rigdal, R. (2011). Aerodynamic Analysis of Drag Reduction Devises on the Underbody for SAAB 9-3 by Using CFD. M. S. Thesis. Chalmers University of Technology. Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  17. Marklund, J., Lofdahl, L., Danielsson, H. and Olsson, G. (2013). Performance of an automotive under-body diffuser applied to a sedan and a wagon vehicle. SAE Paper No. 2013-01-0952.Google Scholar
  18. Mellios, G., Hausberger, S., Keller, M., Samaras, C., Ntziachristos, L., Dilara, P. and Fontaras, G. (2011). Parameterisation of Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions of Passenger Cars and Light Commercial Vehicles for Modelling Purposes. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  19. Mock, P., Kühlwein, J., Tietge, U., Franco, V., Bandivadekar, A. and German, J. (2014). The WLTP: How a new test procedure for cars will affect fuel consumption values in the EU. Int. Council on Clean Transportation. Working Paper 2014-9, 1–20.Google Scholar
  20. Nakamura, D., Onishi, Y. and Takehara, Y. (2015). Flow field analysis in the development of the 2013 model year accord hybrid. SAE Paper No. 2015-01-1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oh, K. T., Kim, J. H., Lee, S. W., Kim, Y. S., Ha, J. W. and Kang, W. K. (2007). Automobile underhood thermal and air flow simulation using CFD. J. Computational Fluids Engineering 12, 1, 22–27.Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, S. E. and Kwak, D. (1990). An upwind differencing scheme for the time-accurate incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal 28, 2, 253–262.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Sapnaras, D. and Dimitriou, I. (2008). Experimental analysis of the underbody pressure distribution of a series vehicle on the road and in the wind tunnel. SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh, S. N., Rai, L., Puri, P. and Bhatnagar, A. (2005). Effect of moving surface on the aerodynamic drag of road vehicles. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 219, 2, 127–134.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junho Cho
    • 1
  • Tae-Kyung Kim
    • 2
  • Kyu-Hong Kim
    • 1
  • Kwanjung Yee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Living & Air Conditioning R&D CenterLG ElectronicsSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations