Comparative study between Korea and UK: relationship between driving style and real-world fuel consumption
- 180 Downloads
It is known that differences in driving styles have a significant impact on fuel efficiency and driving styles are affected by various factors such as driver characteristics, street environment, traffic situation, vehicle performance, and weather conditions. However, existing knowledge about the relationship between driving style and fuel consumption is limited. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the relationship beteen driving style and fuel consumption. The analysis presented in this paper used data from three on-road experiments were conducted independently in two different countries, i.e. South Korea and the United Kingdom. In this study, 91 participants, consisting 44 UK drivers and 47 Korean drivers, were asked to drive approximately 28 km of UK road and 21 km of Korean road, respectively. Driving data, including real-time fuel consumption, vehicle speed, and acceleration pedal usage were collected. The results suggested that driving styles including average vehicle speed and average throttle position were highly correlated with the real-world fuel consumption, and the cultural factors, e.g. road environment, traffic design, and driver’s characteristics affected the driving styles and, consequently, fuel efficiency.
Key WordsDriving style Fuel consumption Cross-cultural difference Traffic environment Field operation test
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berry, I. M. (2010). The Effects of Driving Style and Vehicle Performance on the Real-world Fuel Consumption of U.S. Light-duty Vehicles. M. S. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
- Cleaves, E. (1997). The sharpening: improving your drivers’ knowledge and skills. Commercial Carrier J. 154, 11, 58.62.Google Scholar
- Klunder, G. A., Malone, K., Mak, J. and Wilmink, I. R. (2009). Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Energy Efficiency in Road Transport-Final Report. TNO Report for the European Commission, Sep.Google Scholar
- Lyons, T. J., Kenworthy, J. R. and Newman, P. W. G. (1990). Urban structure and air pollution. Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere 24, 1, 43–48.Google Scholar
- Matthews, G., Desmond, P. A., Joyner, L., Carcary, B. and Gilliland, K. (1996). Validation of the driver stress inventory and driver coping questionnaire. A Summary Report for Int. Conf. Traffic and Transport Psychology: May 22–25. Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
- Mitropoulos, L. K. and Prevedouros, P. D. (2014). Multicriteria Sustainability Assessment in Transportation: Private Car, Car-sharing, and Transit Bus. Trans. Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, No. 14–1486.Google Scholar
- Orofino, L., Cilimingras, L. and Morello, E. (2010). ECODRIVE: Driver behaviour evaluation system to reduce CO2 emissions. World Automotive Congress 2010. Intelligent Transportation Systems, F2010E052, Budapest. Hungary.Google Scholar
- Smidfelt-Rosqvist, L. (1998). Vehicular emissions and fuel consumption in street configurations with different characteristics. Bulletin, 167.Google Scholar
- Son, J., Park, M., Oh, H. and Lee, J. (2013). Age and gender difference in driving style and fuel efficiency on highway driving. The Japanese J. Ergonomics, 49, Supplement, 548–551.Google Scholar
- Son, J., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Pohlmeyer, A. E., Godfrey, K. M., Orszulak, J., Long, J., Kim, M. H., Lee, Y. T. and Coughlin, J. F. (2010). Age and cross-cultural comparison of drivers’ cognitive workload and performance in simulated urban driving. Int. J. Automotive Technology 11, 4, 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar