International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 795–812 | Cite as

Large-eddy simulation of air entrainment during diesel spray combustion with multi-dimensional CFD



Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) was used to perform computations of air entrainment and mixing during diesel spray combustion. The results of this simulation were compared with those of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) simulations and an experiment. The effect of LES on non-vaporizing and vaporizing sprays was evaluated. The validity of the grid size used for the LES analysis was confirmed by determining the subgrid-scale (SGS) filter threshold on the turbulent energy spectrum plot, which separates a resolved range from a modeled one. The results showed that more air was entrained into the jet with decreasing ambient gas temperatures. The mass of the evaporated fuel increased with increasing ambient gas temperatures, as did the mixture fraction variance, showing a greater spread in the profile at an ambient gas temperature of 920 K than at 820 K. Flame lift-off length sensitivity was analyzed based on the location of the flame temperature iso-line. The results showed that for the flame temperature iso-line of 2000oC, the computed lift-off length values in RANS matched the experimental values well, whereas in LES, the computed lift-off length was slightly underpredicted. The apparent heat release rate (AHRR) computed by the LES approach showed good agreement with the experiment, and it provided an accurate prediction of the ignition delay; however, the ignition delay computed by the RANS was underpredicted. Finally, the relationships between the entrained air quantity and mixture fraction distribution as well as soot formation in the jet were observed. As more air was entrained into the jet, the amount of air-fuel premixing that occurred prior to the initial combustion zone increased, upstream of the lift-off length, and therefore, the soot formation downstream of the flame decreased.

Key Words

Large eddy simulation (LES) Diesel spray Air entrainment Diesel combustion Lift-off length 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abraham, J., Bracco, F. V. and Reitz, R. D. (1985). Comparison of computed and measured premixed charge engine combustion. Combustion and Flame, 60, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aceves, S. M. and Flowers, D. L. (2005). A detailed chemical kinetic analysis of low temperature nonsooting diesel combustion. SAE Paper No. 2005-01-0923.Google Scholar
  3. Azimov, U. B., Roziboyev, E. A., Kim, K. S., Jeong, D. S., Lee, Y. G. and Yun, J. E. (2008). Investigation of soot formation in diesel-GTL fuel blends under quiescent conditions. Int. J. Automotive Technology 9,5, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H. and Reynolds, W. C. (1980). Improved subgrid model for large eddy simulations. AIAA Paper 80-1357.Google Scholar
  5. Bianchi, G. M., Minelli, F., Scardovelli, R. and Zaleski, S. (2007). 3D large scale simulation of the high-speed liquid jet atomization. SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0244.Google Scholar
  6. Bilger, R. W. (1976). The structure of diffusion flames. Combust. Sci. Technol., 13, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilger, R. W. (1989). Turbulent diffusion flames. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 21, 101–135.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borman, G. L. and Ragland, K. W. (1998). Combustion Engineering. Int. Edn. McGraw-Hill. New York.Google Scholar
  9. Brenn, G. and Frohn, A. (1989). Collision and merging of two equal droplets of propanol. Experiments in Fluids 7, 7, 441–446.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. W., Gosman, A. D. and Hardy, G. (2008). Analysis of premix flame and lift-off in diesel spray combustion using multi-dimensional CFD. SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0968.Google Scholar
  11. Cant, R. S. and Mastorakos, E. (2007). An Introduction to Turbulent Reacting Flows. Imperial college Press. London.Google Scholar
  12. Chigier, N. (1981). Energy, Combustion and Environment. McGraw-Hill. New York.Google Scholar
  13. Chumakov, S. and Rutland, C. J. (2004). Dynamic structure models for scalar flux and dissipation in large eddy simulation. AIAA J., 42, 1132–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dec, J. E. (1997). A conceptual model of DI diesel combustion based on laser-sheet imaging. SAE Paper No. 970873.Google Scholar
  15. D’Errico, G., Ettorre, D. and Lucchini, T. (2007). Comparison of combustion and pollutant emission models for DI diesel engines. SAE Paper No. 2007-24-0045.Google Scholar
  16. Flynn, P. F., Durrett, R. P., Hunter, G. L., Zur Loye, A. O., Akinyemi, O. C., Dec, J. E. and Westbrook, C. K. (1999). Diesel combustion: An integrated view combining laser diagnostics, chemical kinetics, and empirical validation. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0509.Google Scholar
  17. Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. and Cabot, W. (1991). A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids, 3, 1760–1765.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han, D. and Mungal, M. G. (2001). Direct measurement of entrainment in reacting/nonreacting turbulent jets. Combustion and Flame, 124, 370–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkes, E. R. and Cant, R. S. (2001). Implication of a flame surface density approach to large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion. Combustion and Flame, 126, 1617–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heywood, J. B. (1989). Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill. NewYork. 635–648.Google Scholar
  21. Higgins, B. S., Siebers, D. L. and Aradi, A. (2000). Dieselspray ignition and premixed-burn behavior. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0940.Google Scholar
  22. Hori, T., Senda, J., Kuge, T. and Fujimoto, H. (2006). Large eddy simulation of non-evaporative and evaporative diesel spray in constant volume vessel by use of KIVALES. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-3334.Google Scholar
  23. Hori, T., Kuge, T., Senda, J. and Fujimoto, H. (2007). Large eddy simulation of diesel spray combustion with eddy-dissipation model and CIP method by use of KIVALES. SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0247.Google Scholar
  24. Hori, T., Kuge, T., Senda, J. and Fujimoto, H. (2008). Effect of convective schemes on LES of fuel spray by use of KIVALES. SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0930.Google Scholar
  25. Hu, B. and Rutland, C. J. (2006). Flamelet modeling with LES for diesel engine simulations. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-0058.Google Scholar
  26. Idicheria, C. A. and Pickett, L. M. (2007). Effect of EGR on diesel premixed-burn equivalence ratio. Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, 2931–2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ishikawa, N. and Zhang, L. (1999). Characteristics of airentrainment in a diesel spray. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0522.Google Scholar
  28. Jeong, B. C. (2003). Study on the Spray Characteristics of Common-rail Injection System. M. S. Thesis. Yeosu National University. Korea.Google Scholar
  29. Jhavar, R. and Rutland, C. J. (2006). Using large eddy simulations to study mixing effects in early injection diesel engine combustion. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-0871.Google Scholar
  30. Jiang, Y., Umemura, A. and Law, C. K. (1992). An experimental investigation on the collision behaviour of hydrocarbon droplets. J. Fluid Mechanics, 234, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaario, O., Pokela, H., Kjaldman, L., Tiainen, J. and Larmi, M. (2003). LES and RNG turbulence modeling in DI diesel engines. SAE Paper No. 2003-01-1069.Google Scholar
  32. Kimura, S., Kosaka, H., Matsui, Y. and Himeno, R. (2004). A numerical simulation of turbulent mixing in transient spray by LES (Comparison between numerical and experimental results of transient particle laden jets). SAE Paper No. 2004-01-2014.Google Scholar
  33. Kolmogorov, A. N. (1941 a). The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR, 30, 9–13 (Reprinted in Proc. R. Soc. London A 434 1991, 9–13).Google Scholar
  34. Kolmogorov, A. N. (1941 b). On degradation (decay) of isotropic turbulence in an incompressible viscous liquid. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR, 31, 538–540.Google Scholar
  35. Kolmogorov, A. N. (1941 c). Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 32, 16–18 (Reprinted in Proc. R. Soc. London A 434 1991, 15–17).MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Kong, S.-C., Ayoub, N. and Reitz, R. D. (1992). Modeling combustion in compression ignition homogeneous charge engines. SAE Paper No. 920512.Google Scholar
  37. Kong, S.-C., Han, Z. and Reitz, R. D. (1995). The development and application of a diesel ignition and combustion model for multidimensional engine simulation. SAE Paper No. 950278.Google Scholar
  38. Lee, D., Pomraning, E. and Rutland, C. J. (2002). LES modeling of diesel engines. SAE Paper No. 2002-01-2779.Google Scholar
  39. Lehtiniemi, H., Mauss, F., Balthasar, M. and Magnusson, I. (2006). Modeling diesel spray ignition using detailed chemistry with a progress variable approach. Combust. Sci. Technology, 178, 1977–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lesieur, M. and Metais, O. (1996). New trends in large eddy simulations of turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mechanics, 28, 45–85.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lesieur, M. (2005). Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulence. Cambridge University Press. New-York.?MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li, Y. H. and Kong, S.-C. (2008). Diesel combustion modeling using LES turbulence model with detailed chemistry. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 12, 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Magi, V., Iyer, V. and Abraham, J. (2001). The k-epsilon model and computed spreading rates in round and plane jets. Num. Heat Transfer, Part A, 40, 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Magnussen, B. F. and Hjertager, B. H. (1976). On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. 16th Symp. Combustion. The Combustion Institute. 719–729.Google Scholar
  45. Mastorakos, E., Baritaud, T. A. and Poinsot, T. J. (1997). Numerical simulations of autoignition in turbulent mixing flows. Combustion and Flame, 109, 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Menon, S., Yeung, P. K. and Kim, W. W. (1996). Effects of subgrid models on the computed interscale energy transfer in isotropic turbulence. Comput. Fluids, 25, 165–180.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Menon, S. (2000). Subgrid combustion modelling for large-eddy simulations. Int. J. Engine Res. 1, 2, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mohammadi, A., Miwa, K., Ishiyama, T. and Abe, M. (1998). Investigation of droplets and ambient gas interaction in a diesel spray using a nano-spark photography method. SAE Paper No. 981073.Google Scholar
  49. Moin, P., Squires, K., Cabot, W. and Lee, S. (1991). A dynamic subgrid-scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport. Phys. Fluids, 3, 2746–2757.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Naber, J. and Siebers, D. L. (1996). Effects of gas density and vaporization on penetration and dispersion of diesel sprays. SAE Paper No. 960034.Google Scholar
  51. Patterson, M. A., Kong, S.-C., Hampson, G. J. and Reitz, R. D. (1994). Modeling the effects of fuel injection characteristics on diesel engine soot and NOx emissions. SAE Paper No. 940523.Google Scholar
  52. Pauls, C., Vogel, S., Grünefeld, G. and Peters, N. (2007). Combined simulations and OH-chemiluminescence measurements of the combustion process using different fuels under diesel-engine like condition. SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0020.Google Scholar
  53. Peters, N. (2000). Turbulent Combustion. Cambridge University Press. New-York.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pickett, L. M., Siebers, D. L. and Idicheria, C. A. (2005). Relationship between ignition processes and the lift-off length of diesel fuel jets. SAE Paper No. 2005-01-3843.Google Scholar
  55. Pickett, L. M., Kook, S., Persson H. and Andersson, O. (2009). Diesel fuel jet lift-off stabilization in the presence of laser-induced plasma ignition. Proc. Combust. Inst., 32, 2793–2800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pitsch, H. (2002). Improved pollutant predictions in largeeddy simulations of turbulent non-premixed combustion by considering scalar dissipation rate fluctuations. Proc. Combust. Inst., 29, 1971–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pitsch, H. and Peters, N. (1998). A consistent flamelet formulation for non-premixed combustion considering differential diffusion effects. Combustion and Flame, 114, 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pitsch, H. and Steiner, H. (2000). Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent piloted methane/air diffusion flame (Sandia flame D). Phys. Fluids, 12, 2541–2554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pitsch, H. (2006). Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 38, 453–482.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Poinsot, T. and Veynante, D. (2001). Theoretical and Numerical Combustion. R. T. Edwards, Inc., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  61. Pomraning, E. and Rutland, C. J. (2002). A dynamic oneequation non-viscosity LES model. AIAA J., 44, 689–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pope, S. B. (2004). Ten questions concerning the largeeddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J. Physics, 6,35, 1–24.Google Scholar
  63. Rajalingam, B. V. and Farrell, P. V. (1999). The effect of injection pressure on air entrainment into transient diesel sprays. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0523.Google Scholar
  64. Raman, V. and Pitsch, H. (2005). Large-eddy simulation of a bluff-body stabilized non-premixed flame using a recursive-refinement procedure. Combustion and Flame, 142, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reitz, R. D. (1987). Modeling atomization processes in high pressure vaporizing sprays. Atomization and Spray Technology, 3, 309.Google Scholar
  66. Reitz, R. D. and Diwakar, R. (1987). Structure of highpressure fuel spray. SAE Paper No. 870598.Google Scholar
  67. Reitz, R. D. (1991). Assessment of wall heat transfer models for premixed-charge engine combustion computations. SAE Paper No. 910267.Google Scholar
  68. Reitz, R. D. and Kuo, T. W. (1989). Modeling of HC emissions due to crevice flows in premixed-charge engines. SAE Paper No. 892085.Google Scholar
  69. Rhim, D. R. and Farrell, P. V. (2000). Characteristics of air flow surrounding non-evaporating transient diesel sprays. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-2789.Google Scholar
  70. Rhim, D. R. and Farrell, P. V. (2001). Effect of gas density and the number of injector holes on the air flow surrounding non-evaporating transient diesel sprays. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0532.Google Scholar
  71. Rhim, D. R. and Farrell, P. V. (2002a). Air flow characteristics surrounding evaporating transient diesel sprays. SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0499.Google Scholar
  72. Rhim, D. R. and Farrell, P. V. (2002b). Air flow surrounding burning transient diesel sprays. SAE Paper No. 2002-01-2668.Google Scholar
  73. Ricou, F. P. and Spalding, D. B. (1961). Measurements of entrainment by axisymmetric turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mechanics, 11, 21–32.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sandia National Laboratories, USA, Engine Combustion Network. Available at
  75. Sasaki, S., Akagawa, H. and Tsujimura, K. (1998). A study on surrounding air flow induced by diesel sprays. SAE Paper No. 980805.Google Scholar
  76. Senecal, P. K., Pomraning, E., Richards, K. J., Briggs, T. E., Choi, C. Y., McDavid, R. M. and Patterson, M. A. (2003). Multi-dimensional modeling of direct-injection diesel spray liquid length and flame lift-off length using CFD and parallel detailed chemistry. SAE Paper No. 2003-01-1043.Google Scholar
  77. Siebers, D. L. (1999). Scaling liquid-phase penetration in diesel sprays based on mixing-limited vaporization. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0528.Google Scholar
  78. Siebers, D. and Higgins, B. (2001). Flame lift-off on directinjection diesel sprays under quiescent conditions. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0530.Google Scholar
  79. Smagorinsky, J. (1963). General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Rev., 93, 99–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sone, K. and Menon, S. (2003). Effect of subgrid modeling on the in-cylinder unsteady mixing process in a direct injection engine. J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 125, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. STAR-CD Methodology, V3.26., 11–3, 10–28.Google Scholar
  82. Tap, F. A. and Veynante, D. (2005). Simulation of flame lift-off on a diesel jet using a generalized flame surface density modeling approach. Proc. Combust. Inst., 30, 919–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taylor, G. I. (1938). The spectrum of turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. London A164, 476–490.Google Scholar
  84. Tomita, E., Hamamoto, Y., Tsutsumi, H. and Yoshiyama, S. (1995). Measurement of ambient air entrainment into transient free gas jet by means of flow visualization. SAE Paper No. 950056.Google Scholar
  85. Tomita, E., Hamamoto, Y., Yoshiyama, S., Tsutsumi, H. and Watanabe, T. (1997). Ambient air entrainment into transient hydrogen jet and its flame jet. SAE Paper No. 970894.Google Scholar
  86. Turns, S. (2000). An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications. 2nd Edn. McGraw-Hill. New-York.Google Scholar
  87. Veynante, D. (2006). Large eddy simulations of turbulent combustion. Conf. Turbulence and Interactions TI 2006, May 29–June 2, Porquerolles, France.Google Scholar
  88. de Villiers, E., Gosman, A. D. and Weller, H. G. (2004). Large eddy simulation of primary diesel spray atomization. SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0100.Google Scholar
  89. Wang, Q. and Squires, K. D. (1996). Large eddy simulation of particle-laden turbulent channel flow. Physics of Fluids, 8, 1207–1223.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Warnatz, J., Maas, U. and Dibble, R. W. (2006). Combustion. 4th Edn. Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 978-3-540-25992-3.Google Scholar
  91. Wilcox, D. C. (1998). Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries. La Canada.Google Scholar
  92. Zhao, H. and Ladommatos, N. (1998). Optical diagnostics for soot and temperature measurement in diesel engines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 24, 221–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Design EngineeringChonnam National UniversityChonnamKorea

Personalised recommendations