Advertisement

International Journal of Automotive Technology

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 619–627 | Cite as

Development of discomfort evaluation method for car ingress motion

  • S. H. Kim
  • K. LeeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Recent improvements in the quality of life have led to a consumer need for emotional quality. This need is regarded as extremely important, particularly for products that require a close interaction between products and users and thus that directly lead to product purchase. As a result, research on how to design user-friendly products has become an important task for corporations. Discomfort evaluation in product use has been extensively researched for this purpose. Most of the research concludes that the joint angles of the human body are the main cause of discomfort and propose a discomfort evaluation method based on joint angles. In general, when a person uses great force, they feel discomfort, and the level of discomfort varies depending on the size of the force. Accordingly, it can be inferred that the force acting on the muscle is one of the important causes of discomfort, and research on the correlation between discomfort and muscle forces is needed. In this study, the authors developed a method to evaluate discomfort during ingress into a vehicle to design a side panel for comfortable ingress into a vehicle. The correlation between the muscle forces and discomfort was investigated, and a discomfort evaluation method based on muscle forces was developed. To calculate the muscle forces during the ingress motion, an experimental mock-up of a vehicle was made, and a motion capture experiment during the ingress motion was conducted with various side panel design parameters. The biomechanical simulation tool was used to perform motion simulation based on the motion data obtained. The mathematical correlation between the calculated muscle forces and discomfort was obtained by means of fuzzy logic, and the discomfort evaluation method developed in this study was used to propose a method for designing a comfortable side panel for a vehicle.

Key Words

Comfort/discomfort Fuzzy logic Human motion simulation Ingress 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowman, D. (2001). Using digital human modeling in a virtual heavy vehicle development environment. In: Chaffin, D. (Ed.), Digital Human Modeling for Vehicle and Workplace Design. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, USA, 77–100.Google Scholar
  2. Cherednichenko, A. and Assmann, E. (2006). Computational approach for entry simulation. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-2358.Google Scholar
  3. Damsgaard, M., Christensen, S. T. and Rasmussen, J. (2001). An efficient numerical algorithm for solving the muscle recruitment problem in inverse dynamics simulations. Int. Society of Biomechanics, XVIIIth Cong., Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  4. Duda, R. O., Hard, E. and Stork, D. G. (2001). Pattern Classification. 2nd Edn. Wiley. New York. USA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Dufour, F. and Wang, X. (2005). Discomfort assessment of car ingress/egress motions using the concept of neutral movement. SAE Paper No. 2005-01-2706.Google Scholar
  6. D’Urso, P. and Santoro, A. (2006). Goodness of fit and variable selection in the fuzzy multiple linear regression. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 2627–2647.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Fortin, C., Gilbert, R., Beuter, A., Laurent, F., Schiettekatte, J., Carrier, R. and Dechamplain, B. (1990). SAFEWORK: A Microcomputer-Aided Workstation Design And Analysis. New Advances and Future Developments. Computer-Aided Ergonomics. Karwowski, W., Genaidy, A. M. and Asfour, S. S. (Eds), Taylor & Francis. London. 157–180.Google Scholar
  8. Gaweda, A. E., Zurada, J. M. and Setiono, R. (2001). Input selection in data-driven fuzzy modeling. Fuzzy Systems, 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Melbourne, Vic., Australia, 1251–1254.Google Scholar
  9. Giacomin, J. and Quattrocolo, S. (1997). An analysis of human comfort when entering and exiting the rear seat of an automobile. Applied Ergonomics 28,5–6, 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hadjili, M. and Wertz, V. (2002). Takagi-sugeno fuzzy modeling incorporating input variables selection. IEEE TRANSMOTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS 10,6, 728–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanson, L., Wienholt, W. and Sperling, L. (2003). A control handling comfort model based on fuzzylogics. Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics, 31, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helander, M. G. and Zhang, L. (1997). Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Ergonomics 40,9, 895–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofmann, M., Dänhard, M., Betzler, N., Witte, K. and Nusser, J. E. (2006). Modelling with LifeMOD in sport science. Int. J. Computer Scinece in Sport, 5, 68–71.Google Scholar
  14. Jang, J.-S. R. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-based Fuzzy Inference Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 23,3, 665–685.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Jang, J.-S. R. (1996). Input selection for ANFIS learning. Fuzzy Systems, Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Conf. New Orleans, LA, USA, 2, 1493–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larin, J., Forsman, M., Kadefors, R. and Örtengren, R. (2002). MTM-based ergonomic workload analysis. Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics 30,3, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lempereur, M., Pudlo, P., Gorce, P. and Lepoutre, F.-X. (2005). Identification of alternative movement techniques during the car entering movement. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2005 IEEE Int. Conf., 4, 3804–3809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levrat, E., Voisin, A., Bombardier, S. and Brémont, J. (1997). Subjective evaluation of car seat comfort with fuzzy set techniques. Int. J. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 12, 891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. LifeMOD/BodySIMM (2007). Biomechanics Research Group, Inc., http://www.lifemodeler.com/LM_Manual_2007/A_motion.htm
  20. Linkens, D. A. and Chen, M. (1999). Input selection and partition validation for fuzzy modelling using neural network. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107, 299–308.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Monnier, G., Renard, F., Chameroy, A., Wang, X. and Trasbot, J. (2006). Motion simulation approach integrated into a design engineering process. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-2359.Google Scholar
  22. Park, J. and Han, S. (2004). A fuzzy rule-based approach to modeling affective user satisfaction towards office chair design. Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics, 34, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pudlo, P., Lempereur, M. and Lepoutre, F.-X. (2006). Prediction of the car entering motion. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-2357.Google Scholar
  24. Rasmussen, J., Vondrak, V., Damsgaard, M., Zee, M. and Christensen, S. T. (2002). The AnyBody project-computer analysis of the human body. Biomechanics of Man 2002, The Czech Society of Biomechanics, Cejkovice, Czech Republic, 270–274.Google Scholar
  25. Rim, Y. H., Moon, J. H., Kim, G. Y. and Noh, S. D. (2008). Ergonomic and biomechanical analysis of automotive general assembly using XML and digital human models. Int. J. Automotive Technology 9,6, 719–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanders, M. S. and McCormick, J. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. 7th Edn. McGraw-Hill. New York. 355.Google Scholar
  27. Seidl, A. and Speyer, H. (1997). RAMSIS — A new CAD tool for ergonomic analysis of vehicles developed for the german automotive industry. SAE Paper No. 970088.Google Scholar
  28. Takagi, T. and Segeno, M. (1985). Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. System Man and Cybernetics SMC-15(1), 116–132.Google Scholar
  29. Thelen, D. G., Anderson, F. C. and Delp, S. L. (2003). Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. J. Biomechanics, 36, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Udo, H., Tajima, T., Uda, S., Yoshinaga, F., Ishihara, E., Yamamoto, Y., Hiura, N., Kataoka, A., Nakai, K. and Umino, H. (1997). Low back load in two car driver seats. Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, X. (1999). A behavior-based inverse kinematics algorithm to predictarm prehension postures for computer-aided ergonomic evaluation. J. Biomechanics, 32, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, X., Chevalot, N., Monnier, G. and Trasbot, J. (2006). From motion capture to motion simulation: an in-vehicle reach motion database for car design. SAE Paper No. 2006-01-2362.Google Scholar
  33. White, A. A. and Panjabi, M. M. (1990). Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd Edn. Lippincott. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  34. Wu, Q., Luo, S. and Sun, S. (2006). A computer-aided driving posture prediction system based on driver comfort. ICAT, LNCS 4282, 1088–1097.Google Scholar
  35. Zacher, I. and Bubb, H. (2004). Strength based discomfort model of posture and movement. SAE Paper No. 2004-01-2139.Google Scholar
  36. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy set. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Zajac, F. E. (1989). Muscle and tendon: Properties, models, scaling and application to biomechanics and motor control. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 17,4, 359–411.Google Scholar
  38. Zhang, L., Helander, M. and Drury, G. (1996). Identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Human Factors 38,3, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Automotive Engineers and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering/SNU-IAMDSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations