Advertisement

Quantifying Recreational Use of an Estuary: A Case Study of Three Bays, Cape Cod, USA

  • Kate K. Mulvaney
  • Sarina F. Atkinson
  • Nathaniel H. MerrillEmail author
  • Julia H. Twichell
  • Marisa J. Mazzotta
Management Applications

Abstract

Estimates of the types and number of recreational users visiting an estuary are critical data for quantifying the value of recreation and how that value might change with variations in water quality or other management decisions. However, estimates of recreational use are minimal and conventional intercept survey methods are often infeasible for widespread application to estuaries. Therefore, a practical observational sampling approach was developed to quantify the recreational use of an estuary without the use of surveys. Designed to be simple and fast to allow for replication, the methods involved the use of periodic instantaneous car counts multiplied by extrapolation factors derived from all-day counts. This simple sampling approach can be used to estimate visitation to diverse types of access points on an estuary in a single day as well as across multiple days. Evaluation of this method showed that when periodic counts were taken within a preferred time window (from 11 am–4:30 pm), the estimates were within 44% of actual daily visitation. These methods were applied to the Three Bays estuary system on Cape Cod, USA. The estimated combined use across all its public access sites is similar to the use at a mid-sized coastal beach, demonstrating the value of estuarine systems. Further, this study is the first to quantify the variety and magnitude of recreational uses at several different types of access points throughout the estuary using observational methods. This work can be transferred to the many small coastal access points used for recreation across New England and beyond.

Keywords

Estuarine recreational use Coastal access Cape Cod Water quality benefits Visitation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Zenas Crocker and the Barnstable Clean Water Coalition, Suzanne Ayvazian, Walter Berry, Marnita Chintala, Ryan Furey, Mo Howard, Tim Gleason, David Martin, Justin Michelson, Emily Santos, Mary Schoell, Marilyn ten Brink, and Talya ten Brink for their field assistance. We are also grateful to Suzanne Ayvazian, Rick McKinney, Casey Tremper, Marnita Chintala, and Wayne Munns for helpful comments on early versions of the manuscript. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This contribution is identified by tracking number ORD-027134 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA. The EPA does not endorse any commercial products, services, or enterprises.

References

  1. Banks-Leite, Cristina, Renata Pardini, Danilo Boscolo, Camila Righetto Cassano, Thomas Püttker, Camila Santos Barros, and Jos Barlow. 2014. Assessing the utility of statistical adjustments for imperfect detection in tropical conservation science. Journal of Applied Ecology. 51:849-859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cape Cod Commission. 2017. Implementation report: Watershed Report, Mid Cape Three Bays.Google Scholar
  3. Da Silva, Carlos Pereira. 2002. Beach carrying capacity assessment: how important is it? Journal of Coastal Research. 36: 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalton, Tracey, Robert Thompson, and Di Jin. 2010. Mapping human dimensions in marine spatial planning and management: an example from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Marine Policy. 34: 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Cantis, Stefano, Anna Maria Parroco, Mauro Ferrante, and Franco Vaccina. 2015. Unobserved tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 50: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deacon, Robert T., and Charles D. Kolstad. 2000. Valuing beach recreation lost in environmental accidents. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 126: 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dwight, Ryan H., Mitchell V. Brinks, Gajapathi SharavanaKumar, and Jan C. Semenza. 2007. Beach attendance and bathing rates for Southern California beaches. Ocean & Coastal Management. 50: 847–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. English, Donald B.K., Susan M. Kocis, Stanley J. Zarnoch, and J. Ross Arnold. 2000. Forest Service national visitor use monitoring process: research method documentation. General Technical Report SRS-57. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 14pp.Google Scholar
  9. English, Eric, Roger H. von Haefen, Joseph Herriges, Christopher Leggett, Frank Lupi, Kenneth McConnell, Michael Welsh, Adam Domanski, and Norman Meade. 2018. Estimating the value of lost recreation days from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 91: 26-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fesenmaier, Daniel R., Lonnie Jones, U.M. Soeho, and Teofilo Ozuna Jr. 1989. Assessing the economic impact of outdoor recreation travel to the Texas Gulf Coast. Journal of Travel Research. 28 (1): 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman, A. Myrick. 1995. The benefits of water quality improvements for marine recreation: a review of the empirical evidence. Marine Resource Economics. 10 (4): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garcia, Anthony, and Jayson R. Smith. 2013. Factors influencing human visitation of southern California rocky intertidal ecosystems. Ocean & Coastal Management. 73: 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greene, Gretchen, Charles B. Moss, and Thomas H. Spreen. 1997. Demand for recreational fishing in Tampa Bay. Florida: a random utility approach. Marine Resource Economics. 12: 293–305.Google Scholar
  14. Hankey, Steve, and Greg Lindsey. 2016. Facility-demand models of peak-period pedestrian and bicycle traffic: comparison of fully specific and reduced-form models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2586: 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harada, Scott Y., Ralph S. Goto, and Andrew T. Nathanson. 2011. Analysis of lifeguard-reported data at Hanauma Bay. Hawaii. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 22: 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes, Karen M., Timothy J. Tyrell, and Glen Anderson. 1992. Estimating the benefits of water quality improvements in the upper Narragansett Bay. Marine Resource Economics. 7: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horsch, Eric, Michael Welsh, and Jason Price. 2017. Best practices for collecting onsite data to assess recreational use impacts from an oil spill. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OR&R 54. Silver Spring, MD: Assessment and Restoration Division, NOAA. 121 pp.  https://doi.org/10.7289/V5/TM-NOS-ORR-54. Available at ftp://ftp.library.noaa.gov/noaa_documents.lib/NOS/ORR/TM_NOS_ORR/TM_NOS-ORR_54.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.
  18. Johnston, Robert J., Thomas A. Grigalunas, James J. Opaluch, Marisa Mazzotta, and Jerry Diamantedes. 2002. Valuing estuarine resource services using economic and ecological models: the Peconic Estuary System study. Coastal Management. 30: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keeler, Bonnie L., Spencer A. Wood, Stephen Polasky, Catherine Kling, Christopher T. Filstrup, and John A. Downing. 2015. Recreational demand for clean water: evidence from geotagged photographs by visitors to lakes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 13 (2): 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. King, Philip, and Aaron McGregor. 2012. Who’s counting: an analysis of beach attendance estimates and methodologies in southern California. Ocean & Coastal Management. 58: 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kline, Jeffrey D., and Stephen K. Swallow. 1998. The demand for local access to coastal recreation in southern New England. Coastal Management. 26 (3): 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kreitler, Jason, Michael Papenfus, Kristin Byrd, and William Labiosa. 2013. Interacting coastal based ecosystem services: recreation and water quality in Puget Sound, WA. PLOS ONE. 8 (2): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leeworthy, Vernon R., and Peter C. Wiley. 2001. Current participation patterns in marine recreation. Silver Spring: U.S. Department of Commerce. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Ocean Service. Special Projects.Google Scholar
  24. Leggett, Christopher G. 2017. Sampling strategies for on-site recreation counts. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. 5: 326–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leggett, Chris and Mark Curry. 2011. Assessment of visitor activities at six sites within Golden Gate National Recreation Area. Report prepared for National Park Service, Golden Gate National Recreation Area. Available at https://www.nps.gov/goga/learn/management/upload/GGNRA-Visitor-Activities-Report-12-20-11-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.
  26. Lepesteur, Muriel, Aggie Wegner, Susan A. Moore, and Arthur McComb. 2008. Importance of public information and perception for managing recreational activities in the Peel-Harvey estuary. Western Australia. Journal of Environmental Management. 87: 389–395.Google Scholar
  27. Lipton, Douglas W., and Robert Hicks. 1999. Linking water quality improvements to recreational fishing values: the case of Chesapeake Bay striped bass, p. 105-110. In Pitcher, Tony J. (ed.) Evaluating the benefits of recreational fisheries centre reports. 7(2): 105-110.Google Scholar
  28. Lipton, Douglas, and Robert Hicks. 2003. The cost of stress: low dissolved oxygen and economic benefits of recreational striped bass (Morone saxatilis) fishing in the Patuxent River. Estuaries. 26 (2A): 310–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lotze, Heike K. 2010. Historical reconstruction of human-induced changes in U.S. estuaries. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. 48: 267–338.Google Scholar
  30. Lyon, Sarina F., Nathaniel H. Merrill, Kate K. Mulvaney, and Marisa J. Mazzotta. 2018. Valuing coastal beaches and closures using benefit transfer: an application to Barnstable, Massachusetts. Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics 5 (1) Article 1.Google Scholar
  31. Morgan, Damian. 2016. Development of a method to estimate and predict beach visitation. Tourism in Marine Environments. 12 (1): 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration). 2019. Types of recreational fishing surveys. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/recreational-fishing-data/types-recreational-fishing-surveys#access-point-angler-intercept-survey. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.
  33. Nordback, Krista, Wesley E. Marshall, Bruce N. Janson, and Elizabeth Stolz. 2013. Transportation research record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2339: 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palm-Forster, Leah H., Frank Lupi, and Min Chen. 2016. Valuing Lake Erie beaches using value and function transfers. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 45 (2): 270–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patrolia, Emily, Robert Thompson, Tracey Dalton, and Porter Hoagland. 2017. The influence of weather on the recreational uses of coastal lagoons in Rhode Island, USA. Marine Policy. 83: 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pendleton, Linwood. 2008. The economic and market value of America’s coasts and estuaries: what’s at stake. Washington, DC: Coastal Ocean Values Press 182 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Rasmussen, Paul W., Michael D. Staggs, T. Douglas Beard Jr., and Steven P. Newman. 1998. Bias and confidence interval coverage of creel survey estimators evaluated by simulation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 127 (3): 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smale, Bryan. 2011. A comparison of selected systematic sampling procedures in accurately estimating recreation participation. Leisure/Loisir. 35 (4): 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Soupir, Craig A., Michael L. Brown, Cliff C. Stone, and John P. Lott. 2006. Comparison of creel survey methods on Missouri River Reservoirs. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 26 (2): 338–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spencer Banzhaf H.. 1996. Estimating recreational use levels with periodic counts. Triangle Economic Research Technical Working Paper: T-9602.Google Scholar
  41. State of Massachusetts. 2013. Massachusetts Year 2012 Integrated List of Waters: Final Listing of the Condition of Massachusetts’ Waters Pursuant to Sections 305(b), 314 and 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Available online: http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dep/water/resources/07v5/12list2.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  42. Tourangeau, Roger, Eric English, Kenneth E. McConnell, David Chapman, Ismael Flores Cervantes, Eric Horsch, Norman Meade, Adam Domanski, and Michael Walsh. 2017. The Gulf recreation study: assessing lost recreational trips from the 2010 Gulf Oil Spill. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. 5 (3): 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vølstad, Jon H., Kenneth H. Pollock, and William A. Richkus. 2006. Comparing and combining effort and catch estimates from aerial-access designs as applied to a large-scale angler survey in the Delaware River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 26: 727–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wallmo, Kristy. 2003. Assessment of techniques for estimating beach attendance. Beach Sampling Report of NOAA. 33 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Zarnoch, Stanley J., Eric M. White, Donald B.K. English, Susan M. Kocis, and Ross Arnold. 2011. The national visitor use monitoring methodology and final results for round 1. General Technical Report SRS-144. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 83 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection  2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate K. Mulvaney
    • 1
  • Sarina F. Atkinson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nathaniel H. Merrill
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julia H. Twichell
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marisa J. Mazzotta
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences DivisionU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNarragansettUSA
  2. 2.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) FisheriesMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Narragansett Bay Estuary ProgramNarragansettUSA

Personalised recommendations