Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 55–67 | Cite as

Riverine Sediment Contribution to Distal Deltaic Wetlands: Fourleague Bay, LA

  • Giancarlo A. RestreppoEmail author
  • Samuel J. Bentley
  • Jiaze Wang
  • Kehui Xu


To combat land loss along the Mississippi River Delta, Louisiana has launched a historic campaign to sustain and regrow coastal lands using, in part, sediment diversions. Previous research has focused primarily on sand-sized sediment load, which is usually deposited proximal to a river’s delta or a diversion’s outlet. Fine sediments constitute the majority of sediment load delivered by rivers, but are understudied with respect to dispersal processes, particularly in terms of sediment supply to distal deltaic bays and wetlands. The Atchafalaya River and associated wetlands serve as prime study areas for this purpose. Fourleague Bay has remained stable against the deteriorative effects of relative sea level rise, standing out along Louisiana’s declining coastline. Push cores were collected once every 2 months, from May 2015 to May 2016, along five central bay sites and five adjacent marsh sites within Fourleague Bay, Louisiana. All sites fall within ~ 10 to 30 km of the Atchafalaya Delta, extending south towards the Gulf of Mexico. Cores were extruded in 2-cm intervals, dried, ground, and analyzed via gamma spectrometry for the presence of 7Be. Inventories of 7Be were then calculated and used to determine daily apparent mass deposition rates (AMDR) over 12 months. Average AMDR values for the bay and the marshes are compared with Atchafalaya River discharge, wind data, and atmospheric pressure through the year of sampling. Peak marsh AMDR, 0.7 ± 0.2 kg m−2 d−1, occurred just after historically high river discharge. Peak bay AMDR, 1.2 ± 0.7 kg m−2 d−1, occurred during seasonal low river discharge and calm winds. Average bay and marsh AMDRs have a moderate negative correlation (r = − 0.51) when compared. Results indicate that, during periods of moderate to high river discharge, sediment bypasses the bay floor and enters the marshes directly when inundation occurs, a process enhanced by the passage of strong atmospheric fronts. During periods of low river discharge and relatively calm winds, riverine sediments aggregate directly onto the bay floor.


Deltaic sedimentation Wetlands Marshes Mass transport Cohesive sediment Fourleague Bay Louisiana 



We thank the Coastal Studies Institute Field Support Group and the Bentley Lab for technical assistance, and the Billy and Ann Harrison Endowment for Sedimentary Geology for additional support.

Funding Information

This research is based upon work supported by National Science Foundation Coastal SEES Grant No. 1427389, the Louisiana State University Board of Regents, and the Southern Regional Educational Board.


  1. Allen, Y.C., B.R. Couvillion, and J.A. Barras. 2012. Using multitemporal remote sensing imagery and inundation measures to improve land change estimates in coastal wetlands. Estuaries and Coasts 35 (1): 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, M.A., and E.A. Meselhe. 2010. The use of large water and sediment diversions in the lower Mississippi River (Louisiana) for coastal restoration. Journal of Hydrology 387 (3): 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, M.A., C.R. Demas, B.A. Ebersole, B.A. Kleiss, C.D. Little, E.A. Meselhe, N.J. Powell, T.C. Pratt, and B.M. Vosburg. 2012. A water and sediment budget for the lower Mississippi-Atchafalaya River in flood years 2008-2010: Implications for sediment discharge to the oceans and coastal restoration in Louisiana. Journal of Hydrology 432-433: 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, M.A., B.T. Yuill, E.A. Meselhe, J.K. Marsh, A.S. Kolker, and A.D. Ameen. 2017. Observational and numerical particle tracking to examine sediment dynamics in a Mississippi River delta diversion. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 194: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrus, M.T. and Bentley, S.J. (2007) Sediment flux and fate in the Mississippi River diversion at West Bay: Observation study. In Coastal Sediment ‘07, pp. 722–735. Kraus, N.C, and Rosati, J.D. Eds.Google Scholar
  6. Baskaran, M., C.H. Coleman, and P.H. Santschi. 1993. Atmospheric depositional fluxes of 7Be and 210Pb at Galveston and College Station, Texas. Journal of Geophysical Research 98 (D11): 20,555–20,571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baskaran, M., M. Ravichandran, and T.S. Bianchi. 1997. Cycling of 7Be and 210Pb in a high DOC, shallow, turbid estuary of south-east Texas. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45 (2): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blake, W.H., D.E. Walling, and Q. He. 2002. Using cosmogenic beryllium-7 as a tracer in sediment budget investigations. Geografiska Annaler, Series A: Physical Geography 84 (2): 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blum, M.D., and H.H. Roberts. 2009. Drowning of the Mississippi Delta due to insufficient sediment supply and global sea-level rise. Nature Geoscience 2 (7): 488–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, S. et al. (2017) 2017 Coastal Master Plan: Appendix C: Modeling Chapter 3 – Modeling Components and Overview. Version final. (p. 72). Baton Rouge, Lousiana: Coastal protection and restoration authority.Google Scholar
  11. Casey, W.H. 1986. The distribution of cosmogenic 7Be in salt marsh sediments. Geophysical Research Letters 13 (4): 322–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Couvillion, B.R. et al. (2011) Land area change in coastal Louisiana from 1932 to 2010: U.S. Geological Surevey Investigations Map 3164, 12 p. pamphlet.Google Scholar
  13. Day, J.W., et al. 2000. Pattern and process of land loss in the Mississippi Delta: A spatial and temporal analysis of wetland habitat change. Estuaries 23 (4): 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Day, J.W., D.F. Boesch, E.J. Clairain, G.P. Kemp, S.B. Laska, W.J. Mitsch, K. Orth, H. Mashriqui, D.J. Reed, L. Shabman, C.A. Simenstad, B.J. Streever, R.R. Twilley, C.C. Watson, J.T. Wells, and D.F. Whigham. 2007. Restoration of the Mississippi Delta: Lessons from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Science 315 (5819): 1679–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Day, J.W., et al. 2016. Large infrequently operated river diversions for Mississippi delta restoration. Estuarine, Coastal, & Shelf Science 183 (part B): 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeMaster, D.J., B.A. McKee, C.A. Nittrouer, Q. Jiangchu, and C. Guodong. 1985. Rates of sediment accumulation and particle reworking based on radiochemical measurements from continental shelf deposits in the East China Sea. Continental Shelf Research 4 (1–2): 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denommee, K.C., et al. 2017. Mechanisms of muddy clinothem progradation on the Southwest Louisiana Chenier Plain inner shelf. Geo-Marine Letters.
  18. Fitzgerald, S.A., J.V. Klump, P.W. Swarzenski, R.A. Mackenzie, and K.D. Richards. 2001. Beryllium-7 as a tracer of short-term sediment deposition and resuspension in the Fox River, Wisconsin. Environmental Science & Technology 35 (2): 300–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giosan, L., J. Syvitski, S. Constantinescu, and J. Day. 2014. Protect the world’s deltas. Nature 516 (7529): 31–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guzmán, G., J.N. Quinton, M.A. Nearing, L. Mabit, and J.A. Gómez. 2013. Sediment tracers in water erosion studies: Current approaches and challenges. Journal of Soils and Sediments 13 (4): 816–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawley, N., J.A. Robbins, and B.J. Eadie. 1986. The partitioning of 7beryllium in fresh water. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 50 (6): 1127–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jankowski, K.L., T.E. Törnqvist, and A.M. Fernandes. 2017. Vulnerability of Louisiana's coastal wetlands to present-day rates of relative sea-level rise. Nature Communications 8: 14792. Scholar
  23. Keller, G., et al. 2016. River-plume sedimentation and 210Pb/7Be seabed delivery on the Mississippi River Delta Front. Geo-Marine Letters: 1–14.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, W., D. Mohrig, R. Twilley, C. Paola, and G. Parker. 2009. Is it feasible to build new land in the Mississippi River Delta? EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union 90 (42): 373–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolker, A.S., M.D. Miner, and H.D. Weathers. 2012. Depositional dynamics in a river diversion receiving basin: The case of the West Bay Mississippi River Diversion. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 106: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ko, J.Y., et al. 2017. Challenges in collaborative governance for coastal restoration: Lessons from the Caernarvon river diversion in Louisiana. Coastal Management 45 (2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lane, R.R., C.J. Madden, J.W. Day, and D.J. Solet. 2010. Hydrologic and nutrient dynamics of a coastal bay and wetland receiving discharge from the Atchafalaya River. Hydrobiologia 658 (1): 55–66. Scholar
  28. Lewis, R.C., K.H. Coale, B.D. Edwards, M. Marot, J.N. Douglas, and E.J. Burton. 2002. Accumulation rate and mixing of shelf sediments in the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Marine Geology 181 (1–3): 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lo, E.L., S.J. Bentley, and K. Xu. 2014. Experimental study of cohesive sediment consolidation and resuspension identifies approaches for coastal restoration: Lake Lery, Louisiana. Geo-Marine Letters 34 (6): 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milliman, J.D., and R.H. Mead. 1983. World-wide delivery of river sediment to the oceans. The Journal of Geology 91 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Milliman, J.D., and J.P.M. Syvitski. 1992. Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: The importance of small mountainous rivers. The Journal of Geology 100 (5): 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milliman, J.D. and Farnsworth, K.L. (2011) Runoff, erosion, and delivery to the coastal ocean. River discharge to the coastal ocean: a global synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 13-69.Google Scholar
  33. Muhammed, Z., et al. 2008. Excess 210Pb inventories and fluxes along the continental slop and basins of the Gulf of Papua. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 113 (F1).
  34. Neubauer, S.C., I.C. Anderson, J.A. Constantine, and S.A. Kuehl. 2002. Sediment deposition and accretion in a Mid-Atlantic (U.S.A.) tidal freshwater marsh. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 54 (4): 713–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nittrouer, J.A., J.L. Best, C. Brantley, R.W. Cash, M. Czapiga, P. Kumar, and G. Parker. 2012. Mitigating land loss in coastal Louisiana by controlled diversion of Mississippi River sand. Nature Geoscience 5 (8): 534–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ogston, A.S., et al. 2017. Hydrodynamics and sediment dynamics in Mekong Delta distributary channels: How tidal rivers impact transfer of sediment from source to sink. Oceanography 30 (3): 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olsen, C.R., et al. 1985. Atmospheric fluxes and marsh-soil inventories of 7Be and 210Pb. Journal of Geophysical Research 90 (D6): 10487–10495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perez, B.C., J.W. Day Jr., L.J. Rouse, R.F. Shaw, and M. Wang. 2000. Influence of Atchafalaya River discharge and winter frontal passage on suspended sediment concentration and flux in Fourleague Bay, Louisiana. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50 (2): 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peyronnin, N.S., et al. 2012. Louisiana’s 2012 coastal master plan: Overview of a science-based and publicly informed decision-making process. Journal of Coastal Research 67 (sp1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  40. Roberts, H.H., et al. 2003. An embryonic major delta lobe: A new generation of delta studies in the Atchafalaya-Wax Lake delta system. Transactions. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 53: 690–703.Google Scholar
  41. Roberts, H.H., et al. 2015. Floods and cold front passages: Impacts on coastal marshes in a river diversion setting (Wax Lake delta area, Louisiana). Journal of Coastal Research 37 (5): 1057–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rotondo, K.A., and S.J. Bentley. 2003. Deposition and resuspension of fluid muds on the western Louisiana inner continental shelf. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions 53: 722–731.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, J.E., Bentley, S.J., Snedden, G.A., and White, C. 2015. What role do hurricanes play in sediment delivery to subsiding river deltas? Scientific Reports. 5: 17582.
  44. Syvitski, J.P.M., A.J. Kettner, I. Overeem, E.W.H. Hutton, M.T. Hannon, G.R. Brakenridge, J. Day, C. Vörösmarty, Y. Saito, L. Giosan, and R.J. Nicholls. 2009. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nature Geoscience 2 (10): 681–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Twilley, R.R., S.J. Bentley, Q. Chen, D.A. Edmonds, S.C. Hagen, N.S.N. Lam, C.S. Willson, K. Xu, D.W. Braud, R. Hampton Peele, and A. McCall. 2016. Co-evolution of wetland landscapes, flooding, and human settlement in the Mississippi River Delta Plain. Sustainability Science 11 (4): 711–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. U.S. Geological Survey. 2017. The National Map, 2017, 3DEP products and services: The National Map, 3D Elevation Program Web page, at Accessed 19 Feb 2018.
  47. Walling, D.E. 2012. Beryllium-7: The Cinderella of fallout radionuclide sediment tracers? Hydrological Processes 27 (6): 830–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walsh, J.P., C.A. Nittrouer, C.M. Palinkas, A.S. Ogston, R.W. Sternberg, and G.J. Brunskill. 2004. Clinoform mechanics in the Gulf of Papua, New Guinea. Continental Shelf Research 24 (19): 2487–2510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang, J., K. Xu, G.A. Restreppo, S.J. Bentley, X. Meng, and X. Zhang. 2018. The coupling of bay hydrodynamics to sediment transport and its implication in micro-tidal wetland sustainability. Marine Geology 405: 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu, K., S. Bentley, P. Robichaux, X. Sha, and H. Yang. 2016. Implications of texture and erodibility for sediment retention in receiving basins of coastal Louisiana diversions. Water 8 (1): 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Coastal Studies InstituteLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Oceanography and Coastal SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations