Advertisement

Functional and Compositional Responses of Periphyton Mats to Simulated Saltwater Intrusion in the Southern Everglades

  • Viviana Mazzei
  • Evelyn E. Gaiser
  • John S. Kominoski
  • Benjamin J. Wilson
  • Shelby Servais
  • Laura Bauman
  • Stephen E. Davis
  • Steve Kelly
  • Fred H. Sklar
  • David T. Rudnick
  • Joseph Stachelek
  • Tiffany G. Troxler
Article

Abstract

Periphyton plays key ecological roles in karstic, freshwater wetlands and is extremely sensitive to environmental change making it a powerful tool to detect saltwater intrusion into these vulnerable and valuable ecosystems. We conducted field mesocosm experiments in the Florida Everglades, USA to test the effects of saltwater intrusion on periphyton metabolism, nutrient content, and diatom species composition, and how these responses differ between mats from a freshwater versus a brackish marsh. Pulsed saltwater intrusion was simulated by dosing treatment chambers monthly with a brine solution for 15 months; control chambers were simultaneously dosed with site water. Periphyton from the freshwater marsh responded to a 1-ppt increase in surface water salinity with reduced productivity and decreased concentrations of total carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus. These functional responses were accompanied by significant shifts in periphytic diatom assemblages. Periphyton mats at the brackish marsh were more functionally resilient to the saltwater treatment (~ 2 ppt above ambient), but nonetheless experienced significant shifts in diatom composition. These findings suggest that freshwater periphyton is negatively affected by small, short-term increases in salinity and that periphytic diatom assemblages, particularly at the brackish marsh, are a better metric of salinity increases compared with periphyton functional metrics due to functional redundancy. This research provides new and valuable information regarding periphyton dynamics in response to changing water sources in the southern Everglades that will allow us to extend the use of periphyton, and their diatom assemblages, as tools for environmental assessments related to saltwater intrusion.

Keywords

Coastal freshwater wetlands Salinity Microbial mats Diatoms Indicator species 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Shawn Abrahams, Michelle Blaha, Marbelys Garriga, Adam Hines, Rowan Johnson, Oliver Ljustina, Melinda Martinez, Fabiola Santamaria, Chris Sillivan, Frank Skiff, Emily Standen, Ryan Stolee, and Mary Grace Thibault for help in the field; Andres Leon and Sara Osorio for help in sample processing and data entry; and Franco Tobias for laboratory assistance particularly with species identification. This manuscript was greatly improved by feedback from two anonymous reviewers. This is contribution number 866 from the Southeast Environmental Research Center in the Institute of Water and Environment at Florida International University.

Funding Information

Funding for research was supported by Florida Sea Grant R/C-S-56, including cooperative agreements with the South Florida Water Management District, the Everglades Foundation, and Everglades National Park. Additional funding was provided through the National Science Foundation’s Florida Coastal Everglades Long Term Ecological Research Program (DEB-1237517).

References

  1. Affenzeller, M.J., A. Darehshouri, A. Andosch, C. Lütz, and U. Lütz-Meindl. 2009. Salt stress-induced cell death in the unicellular green alga Micrasterias denticulata. Journal of Experimental Botany 60 (3): 939–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam, S.M. 1999. Nutrient uptake by plants under stress conditions. In Handbook of plant and crop stress, ed. M. Pessarakli, vol. 2, 285–313. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Azim, M.E., and T. Asaeda. 2005. Periphyton structure, diversity and colonization. In Periphyton: Ecology, exploitation and management, ed. M.E. Azim, M.C. Verdegem, A.A. van Dam, and M.C. Beveridge, 15–35. Cambridge: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briceño, H., G. Miller, and S.E. Davis. 2014. Relating freshwater flow with estuarine water quality in the Southern Everglades mangrove ecotone. Wetlands 34 (S1): 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, C.E., S.R. Pezeshki, and R.D. DeLaune. 2006. The effects of salinity and soil drying on nutrient uptake and growth of Spartina alterniflora in a simulated tidal system. Environmental and Experimental Botany 58 (1–3): 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Childers, D.L., D. Iwaniec, D. Rondeau, G. Rubio, E. Verdon, and C.J. Madden. 2006a. Responses of sawgrass and spikerush to variation in hydrologic drivers and salinity in Southern Everglades marshes. Hydrobiologia 569 (1): 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Childers, D.L., J.N. Boyer, S.E. Davis, C.J. Madden, D.T. Rudnick, and F.H. Sklar. 2006b. Relating precipitation and water management to nutrient concentrations in the oligotrophic “upside-down” estuaries of the Florida Everglades. Limnology and Oceanography 51 (1part2): 602–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi, T.S., E.J. Kang, J.H. Kim, and K.Y. Kim. 2010. Effect of salinity on growth and nutrient uptake of Ulva pertusa (Chlorophyta) from an eelgrass bed. Algae 25 (1): 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, S.M., D.L. Childers, J.J. Lorenz, H.R. Wanless, and T.E. Hopkins. 2005. A conceptual model of ecological interactions in the mangrove estuaries of the Florida Everglades. Wetlands 25 (4): 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Cáceres, M., and P. Legendre. 2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90 (12): 3566–3574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desrosiers, C., J. Leflaive, A. Eulin, and L. Ten-Hage. 2013. Bioindicators in marine waters: Benthic diatoms as a tool to assess water quality from eutrophic to oligotrophic coastal ecosystems. Ecological Indicators 32: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dessu, S.B., R.M. Price, T.G. Troxler, and J.S. Kominoski. 2018. Effects of sea-level rise and freshwater management on long-term water levels and water quality in the Florida Coastal Everglades. Journal of Environmental Management 211: 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ewe, S.M., E.E. Gaiser, D.L. Childers, D. Iwaniec, V.H. Rivera-Monroy, and R.R. Twilley. 2006. Spatial and temporal patterns of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) along two freshwater-estuarine transects in the Florida Coastal Everglades. Hydrobiologia 569 (1): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falkowski, P.G. and J.A. Raven. 2013. Aquatic photosynthesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Flower, H., M. Rains, D. Lewis, J.Z. Zhang, and R. Price. 2017. Saltwater intrusion as potential driver of phosphorus release from limestone bedrock in a coastal aquifer. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 184: 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaiser, E. 2009. Periphyton as an indicator of restoration in the Florida Everglades. Ecological Indicators 9: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaiser, E., A. Wachnicka, P. Ruiz, F. Tobias, and M. Ross. 2005. Diatom indicators of ecosystem change in subtropical coastal wetlands. Estuarine indicators. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gaiser, E.E., J.C. Trexler, R.D. Jones, D.L. Childers, J.H. Richards, and L.J. Scinto. 2006. Periphyton responses to eutrophication in the Florida Everglades: Cross-system patterns of structural and compositional change. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 617:630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaiser, E., J.M.L. Hée, F.A. Tobias, and A.H. Wachnicka. 2010. Mastogloia smithii var lacustris Grun.: A structural engineer of calcareous mats in karstic subtropical wetlands. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 160 (1): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaiser, E.E., P.V. McCormick, S.E. Hagerthey, and A.D. Gottlieb. 2011. Landscape patterns of periphyton in the Florida Everglades. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 41 (sup1): 92–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grattan, S.R., and C.M. Grieve. 1998. Salinity–mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Scientia Horticulturae 78 (1-4): 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagerthey, S.E., B.J. Bellinger, K. Wheeler, M. Gantar, and E. Gaiser. 2011. Everglades periphyton: A biogeochemical perspective. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 41 (sup1): 309–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hasegawa, P.M., R.A. Bressan, J.K. Zhu, and H.J. Bohnert. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annual Review of Plant Biology 51 (1): 463–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasle, G.R., and G.A. Fryxell. 1970. Diatoms: Cleaning and mounting for light and electron microscopy. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 89: 469–474.Google Scholar
  25. Herbert, E.R., P. Boon, A.J. Burgin, S.C. Neubauer, R.B. Franklin, M. Ardón, K.N. Hopfensperger, L.P. Lamers, and P. Gell. 2015. A global perspective on wetland salinization: Ecological consequences of a growing threat to freshwater wetlands. Ecosphere 6: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu, Y., and U. Schmidhalter. 2005. Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168 (4): 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ikenaga, M., R. Guevara, A.L. Dean, C. Pisani, and J.N. Boyer. 2010. Changes in community structure of sediment bacteria along the Florida coastal everglades marsh–mangrove–seagrass salinity gradient. Microbial Ecology 59 (2): 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iwaniec, D.M., D.L. Childers, D. Rondeau, C.J. Madden, and C. Saunders. 2006. Effects of hydrologic and water quality drivers on periphyton dynamics in the southern Everglades. Hydrobiologia 569 (1): 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, R.E., N.C. Tuchman, and C.G. Peterson. 1997. Changes in the vertical microdistribution of diatoms within a developing periphyton mat. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16 (3): 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knapp, A.K., J.M. Briggs, and D.L. Childers. 2007. Estimating aboveground net primary production in grassland and herbaceous dominated systems. In Principles and standards for measuring net primary production in long-term ecological studies, eds. T.J. Fahey and A.K. Knap, 27–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kozlowski, T.T. 1997. Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiology 17 (7): 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krauss, K.W., A.S. From, T.W. Doyle, T.J. Doyle, and M.J. Barry. 2011. Sea-level rise and landscape change influence mangrove encroachment onto marsh in the ten Thousand Islands region of Florida, USA. Journal of Coastal Conservation 15 (4): 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. La Hée, J.M., and E.E. Gaiser. 2012. Benthic diatom assemblages as indicators of water quality in the Everglades and three tropical karstic wetlands. Freshwater Science 31 (1): 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, S.S., E.E. Gaiser, and J.C. Trexler. 2013. Diatom-based models for inferring hydrology and periphyton abundance in a subtropical karstic wetland: Implications for ecosystem-scale bioassessment. Wetlands 33 (1): 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu, C., and A. Vonshak. 2002. Effects of salinity stress on photosystem II function in cyanobacterial Spirulina platensis cells. Physiologia Plantarum 114 (3): 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Macler, B.A. 1988. Salinity effects on photosynthesis, carbon allocation, and nitrogen assimilation in the red alga, Gelidium coulteri. Plant Physiology 88 (3): 690–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazzei, V., and E. Gaiser. 2018. Diatoms as tools for inferring ecotone boundaries in a coastal freshwater wetland threatened by saltwater intrusion. Ecological Indicators 88: 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCormick, P.V., and M.B. O’Dell. 1996. Quantifying periphyton responses to phosphorus in the Florida Everglades: A synoptic-experimental approach. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15 (4): 450–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCormick, P.V., and R.J. Stevenson. 1998. Periphyton as a tool for ecological assessment and management in the Florida Everglades. Journal of Phycology 34 (5): 726–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mendelssohn, I.A., D.P. Batzer, C.R. Holt, and S.A. Graham. 2006. Abiotic constraints for wetland plants and animals. In Ecology of freshwater and estuarine wetlands, eds. D. Batzer and R.R. Sharitz, 82–114. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Neubauer, S.C. 2013. Ecosystem responses of a tidal freshwater marsh experiencing saltwater intrusion and altered hydrology. Estuaries and Coasts 36 (3): 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nodine, E.R., and E.E. Gaiser. 2014. Distribution of diatoms along environmental gradients in the Charlotte Harbor, Florida (USA), estuary and its watershed: Implications for bioassessment of salinity and nutrient concentrations. Estuaries and Coasts 37 (4): 864–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pan, Y., R.J. Stevenson, P. Vaithiyanathan, J. Slate, and C.J. Richardson. 2000. Changes in algal assemblages along observed and experimental phosphorus gradients in a subtropical wetland, USA. Freshwater Biology 44 (2): 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Potapova, M., and D.F. Charles. 2007. Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States. Ecological Indicators 7 (1): 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Price, R.M., P.K. Swart, and J.W. Fourqurean. 2006. Coastal groundwater discharge—an additional source of phosphorus for the oligotrophic wetlands of the Everglades. Hydrobiologia 569 (1): 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rejmánková, E., and J. Komárková. 2000. A function of cyanobacterial mats in phosphorus-limited tropical wetlands. Hydrobiologia 431 (2/3): 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rejmánková, E., and J. Komárková. 2005. Response of cyanobacterial mats to nutrient and salinity changes. Aquatic Botany 83 (2): 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenfeld, J.S. 2002. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98 (1): 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ross, M.S., J.F. Meeder, J.P. Sah, P.L. Ruiz, and G.J. Telesnicki. 2000. The Southeast Saline Everglades revisited: A half-century of coastal vegetation change. Journal of Vegetation Science 11 (1): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saha, A.K., S. Saha, J. Sadle, J. Jiang, M.S. Ross, R.M. Price, L.S. Sternberg, and K.S. Wendelberger. 2011. Sea level rise and South Florida coastal forests. Climatic Change 107 (1–2): 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saha, A.K., C.S. Moses, R.M. Price, V. Engel, T.J. Smith, and G. Anderson. 2012. A hydrological budget (2002–2008) for a large subtropical wetland ecosystem indicates marine groundwater discharge accompanies diminished freshwater flow. Estuaries and Coasts 35 (2): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Satoh, K., Smith, C. M., and D. C. Fork. 1983. Effects of salinity on primary processes of photosynthesis in the red Alga Porphyra perforata. Plant Physiology 73 (3): 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schedlbauer, J.L., J.W. Munyon, S.F. Oberbauer, E.E. Gaiser, and G. Starr. 2012. Controls on ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange in short-and long-hydroperiod Florida Everglades freshwater marshes. Wetlands 32 (5): 801–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sola, A.D., L. Marazzi, M.M. Flores, J.S. Kominoski, and E.E. Gaiser. 2018. Short-term effects of drying-rewetting and long-term effects of nutrient loading on Periphyton N:P stoichiometry. Water 10 (2): 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Solorzano, L., and J.H. Sharp. 1980. Determination of total dissolved phosphorus and particulate phosphorus in natural waters. Limnology and Oceanography 25: 754–758.Google Scholar
  56. Stachelek, J., Kelly, S.P, Sklar, F., Coronado, C.M., Troxler, T., and L. Bauman. 2018. In-situ simulation of sea-level rise impacts on coastal wetlands using a flow-through mesocosm approach. Methods in Ecology and Evolution.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13028.
  57. Stevenson, J. 2014. Ecological assessments with algae: A review and synthesis. Journal of Phycology 50 (3): 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stevenson, R.J., Y. Pan, and H. van Dam. 1999. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences, vol. 2, 57–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Sudhir, P., and S.D.S. Murthy. 2004. Effects of salt stress on basic processes of photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 42 (4): 481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Touchette, B.W. 2007. Seagrass-salinity interactions: Physiological mechanisms used by submersed marine angiosperms for a life at sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (1-2): 194–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trexler, J.C., E.E. Gaiser, J.S. Kominoski, and J. Sanchez. 2015. The role of periphyton mats in consumer community structure and function in calcareous wetlands: Lessons from the Everglades. In Microbiology of the Everglades Ecosystem, 155–179. Boca Raton: Science Publications, CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Troxler, T.G., E. Gaiser, J. Barr, J.D. Fuentes, R. Jaffe, D.L. Childers, L. Collado-Vides, V.H. Rivera-Monroy, E. Castaneda-Moya, W. Anderson, and R. Chambers. 2013. Integrated carbon budget models for the Everglades terrestrial-coastal-oceanic gradient: Current status and needs for inter-site comparisons. Oceanography 26 (3): 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Troxler, T.G., D.L. Childers, and C.J. Madden. 2014. Drivers of decadal-scale change in southern Everglades wetland macrophyte communities of the coastal ecotone. Wetlands 34 (S1): 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vymazal, J., and C.J. Richardson. 1995. Species composition, biomass, and nutrient content of periphyton in the Florida Everglades. Journal of Phycology 31 (3): 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wachnicka, A., E.E. Gaiser, L. Collins, T. Frankovich, and J. Boyer. 2010. Distribution of diatoms and development of diatom-based models for inferring salinity and nutrient concentrations in Florida Bay and adjacent coastal wetlands of South Florida. Estuaries and Coasts 33 (5): 1080–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Webb, E.C., and I.A. Mendelssohn. 1996. Factors affecting vegetation dieback of an oligohaline marsh in coastal Louisiana: Field manipulation of salinity and submergence. American Journal of Botany 83 (11): 1429–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White, E., and D. Kaplan. 2017. Restore or retreat? Saltwater intrusion and water management in coastal wetlands. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 3 (1): e01258.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viviana Mazzei
    • 1
  • Evelyn E. Gaiser
    • 1
  • John S. Kominoski
    • 1
  • Benjamin J. Wilson
    • 1
  • Shelby Servais
    • 1
  • Laura Bauman
    • 1
  • Stephen E. Davis
    • 2
  • Steve Kelly
    • 3
  • Fred H. Sklar
    • 3
  • David T. Rudnick
    • 4
  • Joseph Stachelek
    • 5
  • Tiffany G. Troxler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and Southeast Environmental Research CenterFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.The Everglades FoundationPalmetto BayUSA
  3. 3.South Florida Water Management DistrictWest Palm BeachUSA
  4. 4.The National Park ServicesU.S. Department of the InteriorWashingtonUSA
  5. 5.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations