Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 1793–1805 | Cite as

Linking Habitat Use and Trophic Ecology of Spotted Seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) on a Restored Oyster Reef in a Subtropical Estuary

  • Thomas C. TinHan
  • John A. Mohan
  • Mark Dumesnil
  • Bryan M. DeAngelis
  • R. J. David Wells
Article

Abstract

Predicting population- and ecosystem-level benefits of habitat restoration minimally requires an understanding of the link between the trophic ecology of a species and their use of a habitat. This study combined novel, non-lethal natural tracers of trophic ecology with acoustic tagging techniques to examine spatial and temporal patterns of habitat use of spotted seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus on Half Moon Reef (HMR), a recently restored oyster reef in Matagorda Bay, Texas. Forty-one spotted seatrout (408 ± 25 mm total length) were captured at HMR, surgically implanted with acoustic transmitters, and monitored by an array of underwater listening stations from December 2015 to August 2016. Patterns of presence-absence on HMR were strongly influenced by water temperature, and to a lesser extent, salinity and tidal height. Overall, spotted seatrout residency to HMR was low, with fish being present on the reef 24% of days. When present, individual fish exhibited strong site-attachment to small portions of the reef. Residency to HMR increased significantly with size, while scale stable isotope analysis revealed fish exhibiting high residency to HMR occupied significantly smaller isotopic niches. If indeed smaller fish with decreased residency rely upon a wider range of prey items across multiple habitats than larger, more resident individuals, restored oyster reef habitat may be expected to primarily benefit larger spotted seatrout.

Keywords

Gulf of Mexico Acoustic telemetry Stable isotope analysis Environmental drivers Residency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank C. Ruiz, J. Plumlee, T. Richards, J. Martinez, J. Williams, J. Bowling, S. Mohan, C. Biggs, and B. Erisman for their assistance collecting and tagging fish, J. Sullivan for valuable insight into the study site, and J. Findley for facilitating lodging. We thank M. Dance for discussions regarding statistical analysis, and J. Zahradnik and G. Ging for reporting recaptured fish. Research was conducted under the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Texas A&M University at Galveston (AUP-IACUC 2015-0145). Funding was provided by The Nature Conservancy of Texas.

References

  1. Baltz, D.M., R.G. Thomas, and E.J. Chesney. 2003. Spotted seatrout habitat affinities in Louisiana. In Biology of the spotted seatrout, 147–175. Florida: CRC Press Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  2. Barros, N.B., and D.K. Odell. 1995. Bottlenose dolphin feeding and interactions with fisheries in the Indian River Lagoon system, Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 57: 278–285.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, M.W., R.D. Brumbaugh, L. Airoldi, A. Carranza, L.D. Coen, C. Crawford, O. Defeo, G.J. Edgar, B. Hancock, M.C. Kay, H.S. Lenihan, M.W. Luckenbach, C.L. Toropova, G. Zhang, and X. Guo. 2011. Oyster reefs at risk and recommendations for conservation, restoration, and management. Bioscience 61 (2): 107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boecklen, W.J., C.T. Yarnes, B.A. Cook, and A.C. James. 2011. On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42 (1): 411–440.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bortone, S.A. 2003. Biology of the spotted seatrout. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC press.Google Scholar
  6. Bowler, D.E., and T.G. Benton. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 80 (2): 205–225.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793104006645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bramer, N.M. 2015. Habitat preferences of adult spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus, in Lake Ponchartrain, Louisiana. M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  8. Brown-Peterson, N.J. 2003. The reproductive biology of spotted seatrout. In Biology of the spotted seatrout, ed. Stephen A. Bortone, 99–133. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buchheister, A., and R.J. Latour. 2010. Turnover and fractionation of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in tissues of a migratory coastal predator, summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 67 (3): 445–461.  https://doi.org/10.1139/F09-196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Callihan, J.L., J.H. Cowan, and M.D. Harbison. 2013. Sex differences in residency of adult spotted seatrout in a Louisiana estuary. Marine and Coastal Fisheries 5 (1): 79–92.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2013.781559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlton, J.S., A. Ropicki, and B. Balboa. 2016. The Half Moon Reef restoration: a socioeconomic evaluation. Texas Sea Grant Technical Report, TAMU-SG-16-211, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  13. Coen, L.D., and M.W. Luckenbach. 2000. Developing success criteria and goals for evaluating oyster reef restoration: ecological function or resource exploitation? Ecological Engineering 15 (3-4): 323–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00084-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke, S.J., and R.S. McKinley. 1999. Winter residency and activity patterns of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque), and common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., in a thermal discharge canal. Fisheries Management and Ecology 6 (6): 515–526.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.1999.00175.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper, W.T., L.R. Barbieri, M.D. Murphy, and S.K. Lowerre-Barbieri. 2013. Assessing stock reproductive potential in species with indeterminate fecundity: effects of age truncation and size-dependent reproductive timing. Fisheries Research 138: 31–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunjak, R.A., J.M. Roussel, M.A. Gray, J.P. Dietrich, D.F. Cartwright, K.R. Munkittrick, and T.D. Jardine. 2005. Using stable isotope analysis with telemetry or mark-recapture data to identify fish movement and foraging. Oecologia 144 (4): 636–646.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0101-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis, T.A., J.A. Buckel, J.E. Hightower, and S.J. Poland. 2017. Relating cold tolerance to winterkill for spotted seatrout at its northern latitudinal limits. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 490: 42–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2017.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flaherty, E.A., and M. Ben-David. 2010. Overlap and partitioning of the ecological and isotopic niches. Oikos 119 (9): 1409–1416.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18259.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freedman, R.M., M. Espinoza, K. Voss, T. Farrugia, C.R. Whitcraft, and Christopher G. Lowe. 2017. Does estuary restoration design alter the fine scale movements of grey smoothhounds (Mustelus californicus) in Southern California? Bull South Calif Acad Sci 116 (2): 88–97.Google Scholar
  20. Froeschke, J.T., and B.F. Froeschke. 2011. Spatio-temporal predictive model based on environmental factors for juvenile spotted seatrout in Texas estuaries using boosted regression trees. Fisheries Research 111 (3): 131–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grabowski, J.H., and C.H. Peterson. 2007. Restoring oyster reefs to recover ecosystem services. In Ecosystem engineers: plants to protists, ed. K. Cuddington, J.E. Byers, W.G. Wilson, and A. Hastings, vol. 4, 281–298. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hutchinson, J.J., and C.N. Trueman. 2006. Stable isotope analyses of collagen in fish scales: limitations set by scale architecture. Journal of Fish Biology 69 (6): 1874–1880.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01234.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson, A.L., R. Inger, A.C. Parnell, and S. Bearhop. 2011. Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER—stable isotope Bayesian ellipses in R. Journal of Animal Ecology 80 (3): 595–602.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01806.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly, M.H., W.G. Hagar, T.D. Jardine, and R.A. Cunjak. 2006. Nonlethal sampling of sunfish and slimy sculpin for stable isotope analysis: how scale and fin tissue compare with muscle tissue. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26 (4): 921–925.  https://doi.org/10.1577/M05-084.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kupschus, S. 2003. Development and evaluation of statistical habitat suitability models: an example based on juvenile spotted seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 265: 197–212.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps265197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lenihan, H.S., C.H. Peterson, J.E. Byers, J.H. Grabowski, G.W. Thayer, and D.R. Colby. 2001. Cascading of habitat degradation: oyster reefs invaded by refugee fishes escaping stress. Ecological Applications 11 (3): 764–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lowe, C.G., D.T. Topping, D.P. Cartamil, and Y.P. Papastamatiou. 2003. Movement patterns, home range, and habitat utilization of adult kelp bass Paralabrax clathratus in a temperature no-take marine reserve. Marine Ecology Progress Series 256: 205–216.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps256205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowerre-Barbieri, S.K., S. Walters, J. Bickford, W. Cooper, and R. Muller. 2013. Site fidelity and reproductive timing at a spotted seatrout spawning aggregation site: individual versus population scale behavior. Marine Ecology Progress Series 481: 181–197.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacRae, P.S.D., and J.H. Cowan Jr. 2010. Habitat preferences of spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus, in coastal Louisiana: a step towards informing spatial management in estuarine ecosystems. The Open Fish Science Journal 3 (1): 154–163.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874401X01003010154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCarthy, M.J., and W.S. Gardner. 2002. Nitrogen cycling in East Matagorda Bay. University of Texas Marine Science Insitute, Technical Report TR/02-003, Port Aransas, TX.Google Scholar
  31. Mohan, J.A., S.D. Smith, T.L. Connelly, E.T. Attwood, J.W. McClelland, S.Z. Herzka, and B.D. Walther. 2016. Tissue-specific isotope turnover and discrimination factors are affected by diet quality and lipid content in an omnivorous consumer. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 479: 35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moulton, D.L., M.A. Dance, J.A. Williams, M.Z. Sluis, G.W. Stunz, and J.R. Rooker. 2017. Habitat partitioning and seasonal movement of red drum and spotted seatrout. Estuaries and Coasts 40: 905–916.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0189-7.
  33. Muller, C., and N.A. Strydom. 2017. Evidence for habitat residency and isotopic niche partitioning in a marine-estuarine-dependent species associated with mangrove habitats from the east coast of South Africa. Estuaries and Coasts 40 (6): 1642–1652.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0240-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newsome, S.D., C.M. del Rio, S. Bearhop, and D.L. Phillips. 2007. A niche for isotope ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 (8): 429–436.  https://doi.org/10.1890/060150.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Payne, N.L., B.M. Gillanders, D.M. Webber, and J.M. Semmens. 2010. Interpreting diel activity patterns from acoustic telemetry: the need for controls. Marine Ecology Progress Series 419: 295–301.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perga, M.E., and D. Gerdeaux. 2003. Using the δ13C and δ15N of whitefish scales for retrospective ecological studies: changes in isotope signatures during the restoration of Lake Geneva, 1980-2001. Journal of Fish Biology 63 (5): 1197–1207.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00239.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peterson, B.J., and B. Fry. 1987. Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18 (1): 293–320.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterson, C.H., and R.N. Lipcius. 2003. Conceptual progress towards predicting quantitative ecosystem benefits of ecological restorations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 264: 297–307.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps264297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peterson, C.H., J.H. Grabowski, and S.P. Powers. 2003. Estimated enhancement of fish production resulting from restoring oyster reef habitat: quantitative valuation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 264: 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pittman, S.J., C.A. McAlpine, and K.M. Pittman. 2004. Linking fish and prawns to their environment: a hierarchical landscape approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series 283: 233–254.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps283233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quevedo, M., R. Svanbäck, and P. Eklöv. 2009. Intrapopulation niche partitioning in a generalist predator limits food web connectivity. Ecology 90 (8): 2263–2274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robillard, M.M., L.M. Payne, R.R. Vega, and G.W. Stunz. 2015. Best practices for surgically implanting acoustic transmitters in spotted seatrout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 144 (1): 81–88.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2014.965343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seeley, M.E., and B.D. Walther. 2017. Facultative oligohaline habitat use in a mobile fish inferred from scale chemistry. Marine Ecology Progress Series published online 5 September 2017 doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12223.
  44. Signer, J., and N. Balkenhol. 2015. Reproducible home ranges (rhr): a new, user-friendly R package for analyses of wildlife telemetry data. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39 (2): 358–363.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simpfendorfer, C.A., M.R. Heupel, and R.E. Hueter. 2002. Estimation of short-term centers of activity from an array of omnidirectional hydrophones and its use in studying animal movements. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59 (1): 23–32.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stunz, G.W., T.J. Minello, and L.P. Rozas. 2010. Relative value of oyster reef as habitat for estuarine nekton in Galveston Bay, Texas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 406: 147–159.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Suzuki, K.W., A. Kasai, K. Nakayama, and M. Tanaka. 2005. Differential isotopic enrichment and half-life among tissues in Japanese temperate bass (Lateolabrax japonicus) juveniles: implications for analyzing migration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences 62 (3): 671–678.  https://doi.org/10.1139/F04-231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilberg, M.J., M.E. Livings, J.S. Barkman, B.T. Morris, and J.M. Robinson. 2011. Overfishing, disease, habitat loss, and potential extirpation of oysters in upper Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 436: 131–144.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wohlschlag, D.E., and J.M. Wakeman. 1978. Salinity stresses, metabolic responses and distribution of the coastal spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus. Contributions in Marine Science 21: 171–185.Google Scholar
  50. Wood, S.N. 2006. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. by S. N. WOOD. In Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Vol. 16. CRC Press.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00905_3.x.
  51. zu Ermgassen, P.S.E., M.D. Spalding, B. Blake, L.D. Coen, B. Dumbauld, S. Geiger, J.H. Grabowski, R. Grizzle, M. Luckenbach, K. McGraw, W. Rodney, J.L. Ruesink, S.P. Powers, and R. Brumbaugh. 2012. Historical ecology with real numbers: past and present extent and biomass of an imperilled estuarine habitat. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279 (1742): 3393–3400.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. zu Ermgassen, P.S.E., J.H. Grabowski, J.R. Gair, and S.P. Powers. 2016. Quantifying fish and mobile invertebrate production from a threatened nursery habitat. Journal of Applied Ecology 53 (2): 596–606.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas C. TinHan
    • 1
  • John A. Mohan
    • 1
  • Mark Dumesnil
    • 2
  • Bryan M. DeAngelis
    • 3
  • R. J. David Wells
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Marine BiologyTexas A&M University at GalvestonGalvestonUSA
  2. 2.The Nature ConservancyTexas Coastal OfficeCorpus ChristiUSA
  3. 3.The Nature Conservancy, North America Oceans and CoastsURI Bay CampusNarragansettUSA
  4. 4.Department of Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations