Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 1463–1474 | Cite as

Appraisal of Warm-Temperate South African Mangrove Estuaries as Habitats to Enhance Larval Nutritional Condition and Growth of Gilchristella aestuaria (Family Clupeidae) Using RNA:DNA Ratios

  • Eugin Bornman
  • Nadine Strydom
  • Catriona Clemmesen
Article

Abstract

Estuaries are highly dynamic systems that serve as nursery areas to fishes and are likely to vary in nursery function, mostly due to habitat quality and food availability. Mangroves are thought to be good nurseries as they enhance food availability and protection, improving growth and survival of juvenile fishes. Food quantity and quality may be reflected in nutritional condition, which may in turn be a useful proxy for growth and survival of larval fishes. This study compared the nutritional condition and growth rate of 793 late stage larvae of estuarine roundherring, Gilchristella aestuaria, by using RNA:DNA indices to indirectly compare the feeding environment among similar warm-temperate mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries in South Africa during January 2015 and 2016. Results indicated that G. aestuaria larvae had differing nutritional conditions within the sampling years and within the estuaries. The standardised RNA:DNA (sRD) as well as the RNA residual index values were higher within mangrove estuaries only in 2016. The instantaneous growth rates (Gi) of larvae in mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries were similar; however, post-flexion larvae were found to have a higher Gi and sRD in mangrove estuaries. Turbidity was the major factor influencing the nutritional condition of G. aestuaria larvae. Mangroves have been found to act as sediment sinks and thus may provide advantages that increase feeding success for post-flexion larvae; however, more is yet to be understood in terms of feeding environment dynamics and how habitat quality influences the survival of larval fishes.

Keywords

Nursery habitats Mangroves Fish feeding environments RNA:DNA Nutritional condition Estuarine roundherring Fish larvae 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research (GEOMAR) for laboratory assistance supported by the EU project BIOC3. We also thank the South African Weather Service for providing rainfall data.

Funding

Funding was provided by the National Research Foundation of South Africa under grant number 93570.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The co-author, Nadine A. Strydom, is the M.Sc. supervisor of the first author and is an associate editor of Estuaries and Coasts. The authors declare that there are no other conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

Fishes were treated in accordance with Nelson Mandela University ethics, under ethics clearance number A15-SCI-ZOO-002.

References

  1. Able, Kenneth W. 2005. A re-examination of fish estuarine dependence: Evidence for connectivity between estuarine and ocean habitats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 64 (1): 5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, Janine B., Demitri Veldkornet, and Pascal Tabot. 2016. Distribution of macrophyte species and habitats in South African estuaries. South African Journal of Botany 107: 5–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amara, Rachid, and Robert Galois. 2004. Nutritional condition of metamorphosing sole: Spatial and temporal analyses. Journal of Fish Biology 64 (1): 72–88.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2004.00284.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, Michael W., Kenneth L. Heck, Kenneth W. Able, Daniel L. Childers, David B. Eggleston, Bronwyn M. Gillanders, Benjamin Halpern, et al. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51 (8): 633. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
  5. Blaber, Stephen J.M. 2007. Mangroves and fishes: Issues of diversity, dependence, and dogma. Bulletin of Marine Science 80: 457–472.Google Scholar
  6. Blaber, Stephen J.M., Digby P. Cyrus, and Alan K. Whitfield. 1981. The influence of zooplankton food resources on the morphology of the estuarine clupeid Gilchristella aestuarius (Gilchrist, 1914). Environmental Biology of Fishes 6 (3-4): 351–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bochdansky, Alexander B., Peter Grønkjær, Pierre Pepin, and William C. Leggett. 2008. Food limitation in larval fish: Ontogenetic variation in feeding scope and its potential effect on survival. Marine Ecology Progress Series 367: 239–248.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckley, Lawrence J., Elaine M. Caldarone, and Catriona Clemmesen. 2008. Multi-species larval fish growth model based on temperature and fluorometrically derived RNA/DNA ratios: Results from a meta-analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 371: 221–232.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caldarone, Elaine M., Melissa Wagner, Jeanne St Onge-Burns, and Lawrence J. Buckley. 2001. Protocol and guide for estimating nucleic acids in larval fish using a fluorescence microplate reader. Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 01–11: 22.Google Scholar
  10. Caldarone, Elaine M., Catriona Clemmesen, Elisa Berdalet, Thomas J. Miller, Arild Folkvord, Gloria J. Holt, Pilar M. Olivar, and Iain M. Suthers. 2006. Intercalibration of four spectrofluorometric protocols for measuring RNA/DNA ratios in larval and juvenile fish. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 4 (5): 153–163.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2006.4.153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chícharo, Maria A., and Luis Chícharo. 2008. RNA:DNA ratio and other nucleic acid derived indices in marine ecology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 9 (12): 1453–1471.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms9081453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chícharo, Maria A., Luis Chícharo, Luis Valdés, Eduardo Lópes-Jamar, and Pedro Ré. 1998. Estimation of starvation and diel variation of the RNA/DNA ratios in field-caught Sardina pilchardus larvae off the north of Spain. Marine Ecology Progress Series 164: 273–283.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps164273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chícharo, Maria A., Ana Amaral, Ana Faria, Pedro Morais, Carlos Mendes, David Piló, Radhouan Ben-Hamadou, and Luis Chícharo. 2012. Are tidal lagoons ecologically relevant to larval recruitment of small pelagic fish? An approach using nutritional condition and growth rate. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 112: 265–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clemmesen, Catriona. 1994. The effect of food availability, age or size on the RNA/DNA ratio of individually measured herring larvae: Laboratory calibration. Marine Biology 118 (3): 377–382.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clemmesen, Catriona. 1996. Importance and limits of RNA/DNA ratios as a measure of nutritional condition in fish larvae. In Survival strategies in early life stages of marine resources, ed. Y. Watanabe, 67–82. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
  16. Cocheret De La Morinière, Elroy, Ivan Nagelkerken, Hans Van Der Meij, and Gerard Van Der Velde. 2004. What attracts juvenile coral reef fish to mangroves: Habitat complexity or shade? Marine Biology 144 (1): 139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-003-1167-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costalago, David, Nadine A. Strydom, and Carminita Frost. 2014. Nutritional condition of fish larvae in South African estuaries: An appraisal of three biochemical methods. African Journal of Marine Science 36 (3): 377–386.  https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2014.957349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costalago, David, Nadine A. Strydom, Carminita Frost, and Catriona Clemmesen. 2015. Preliminary insight into the relationship between environmental factors and the nutritional condition and growth of Gilchristella aestuaria larvae in the upper reaches of South African estuaries. Environmental Biology of Fishes 98 (12): 2367–2378.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-015-0447-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahlgren, Craig P., G. Todd Kellison, Aaron J. Adams, Bronwyn M. Gillanders, Matthew S. Kendall, Craig A. Layman, Janet A. Ley, Ivan Nagelkerken, and Joseph E. Serafy. 2006. Marine nurseries and effective juvenile habitats: Concepts and applications. Marine Ecology Progress Series 312: 291–295.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps312291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott, Michael, and Alan K. Whitfield. 2011. Challenging paradigms in estuarine ecology and management. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 94 (4): 306–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emmerson, Winston David. 1992. Feeding and assimilation of mangrove leaves by the crab Sesarma meinerti de Man in relation to leaf-litter production in Mgazana, a warm-temperate southern African mangrove swamp. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 157 (1): 41–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(92)90073-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esteves, Eduardo, Teresa Pina, Maria A. Chícharo, and Pedro Andrade. 2000. The distribution of estuarine fish larvae: Nutritional condition and co-occurrence with predators and prey. Acta Oecologica 21 (3): 161–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(00)01078-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furukawa, Keita, and Eric Wolanski. 1996. Sedimentation in mangrove forests. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 1 (1): 3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025973426404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haigh, Eliria H., and Alan K. Whitfield. 1993. Larval development of Gilchristella aestuaria (Gilchrist, 1914) (Pisces: Clupeidae) from southern Africa. South African Journal of Zoology 28 (4): 168–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02541858.1993.11448314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, Trevor D. 2004. Physico-chemical characteristics of South African estuaries in relation to the zoogeography of the region. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 61 (1): 73–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heck, Kenneth L., Cynthia G. Hays, and Robert J. Orth. 2003. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 253: 123–136.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps253123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoppe-Speer, Sabine C.L., Janine B. Adams, and Dylan Bailey. 2014. Present state of mangrove forests along the Eastern Cape coast, South Africa. Wetlands Ecology and Management 23 (3): 371–383.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-014-9387-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoppe-Speer, Sabine C.L., Janine B. Adams, and Anusha Rajkaran. 2015. Mangrove expansion and population structure at a planted site, East London, South Africa. Southern Forests 77 (2): 131–139.  https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2014.1001622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. James, Nicola C., and Trevor D. Harrison. 2016. A preliminary fish survey of the estuaries on the southeast coast of South Africa , Kayser’s Beach-Kei Mouth: A comparative study. Water SA 42 (1): 82–101.  https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v42i1.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laegdsgaard, Pia, and Craig R. Johnson. 1995. Mangrove habitats as nurseries: Unique assemblages of juvenile fish in subtropical mangroves in eastern Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 126: 67–81.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps126067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laegdsgaard, Pia, and Craig R. Johnson. 2001. Why do juvenile fish utilise mangrove habitats? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 257 (2): 229–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00331-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LePecq, Jean-Bernard, and Claude Paoletti. 1966. A new fluorometric method for RNA and DNA determination. Analytical Biochemistry 17 (1): 100–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(66)90012-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacArthur, Robert H. 1965. Patterns of species diversity. Biological Reviews 40 (4): 510–533.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1965.tb00815.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mazumder, Debashish, Neil Saintilan, Robert J. Williams, and Ron Szymczak. 2011. Trophic importance of a temperate intertidal wetland to resident and itinerant taxa: Evidence from multiple stable isotope analyses. Marine and Freshwater Research 62 (1): 11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MF10076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mbande, Sekiwe M., Alan K. Whitfield, and Paul D. Cowley. 2005. The ichthyofaunal composition of the Mngazi and Mngazana estuaries: A comparative study. Smithiana: 1–56.Google Scholar
  36. Nagelkerken, Ivan, A.M. De Schryver, Marieke C. Verweij, Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, Gerard van der Velde, and Nico Koedam. 2010. Differences in root architecture influence attraction of fishes to mangroves: A field experiment mimicking roots of different length, orientation, and complexity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 396 (1): 27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2010.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newman, Brent K., and R. John Watling. 2007. Definition of baseline metal concentrations for assessing metal enrichment of sediment from the south-eastern Cape coastline of South Africa. Water SA 33: 675–691.Google Scholar
  38. O’Brien, W. John. 1979. The predator-prey interactions of planktivorous fish and zooplankton. American Scientist 67: 572–581.Google Scholar
  39. Paterson, Angus W., and Alan K. Whitfield. 1997. A stable carbon isotope study of the food-web in a freshwater-deprived South African estuary, with particular emphasis on the ichthyofauna. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45 (6): 705–715.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1997.0243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pepin, Pierre, and Randy W. Penney. 1997. Patterns of prey size and taxonomic composition in larval fish: Are there general size-dependent models? Journal of Fish Biology 51 (sa): 84–100.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb06094.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajkaran, Anusha, and Janine B. Adams. 2010. Mangrove litter production and organic carbon pools in the Mngazana Estuary, South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science 32 (1): 17–25.  https://doi.org/10.2989/AJAS.2007.32.1.3.140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reddering, Johan S.V., and Kevin Esterhuysen. 1987. The effects of river floods on sediment dispersal in small estuaries; a case study from East London. South African Journal of Geology 90: 458–470.Google Scholar
  43. Rönnbäck, Patrik, Max Troell, Nils Kautsky, and Jurgenne H. Primavera. 1999. Distribution pattern of shrimps and fish among Avicennia and Rhizophora microhabitats in the Pagbilao Mangroves, Philippines. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 48 (2): 223–234.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1998.0415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheaves, Marcus. 2005. Nature and consequences of biological connectivity in mangrove systems. Marine Ecology Progress Series 302: 293–305.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps302293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheaves, Marcus. 2017. How many fish use mangroves? The 75% rule an ill-defined and poorly validated concept. Fish and Fisheries 18 (4): 778–789.  https://doi.org/10.1111/FAF.12213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheridan, Peter. 1997. Benthos of adjacent mangrove, seagrass and non-vegetated habitats in Rookery Bay, Florida, U.S.A. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 44 (4): 455–469.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1996.0125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silva, Ivan A.L., Ana Faria, Maria A. Teodósio, and Susana Garrido. 2014. Ontogeny of swimming behaviour in sardine Sardina pilchardus larvae and effect of larval nutritional condition on critical speed. Marine Ecology Progress Series 504: 287–300.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Snow, Gavin C., Janine B. Adams, and Guy C. Bate. 2000. Effect of river flow on estuarine microalgal biomass and distribution. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 51 (2): 255–266.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2000.0638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steinke, Trevor D. 1972. Further observations on the distribution of mangroves in the Eastern Cape Province. Journal of South African Botany 38: 165–178.Google Scholar
  50. Steinke, Trevor D. 1986. Mangroves of the East London area. The Naturalist 30: 50–53.Google Scholar
  51. Strydom, Nadine A. 2015. Patterns in larval fish diversity, abundance, and distribution in temperate South African estuaries. Estuaries and Coasts 38 (1): 268–284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9801-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strydom, Nadine A., and Alan K. Whitfield. 2000. The effects of a single freshwater release into the Kromme Estuary. 4: Larval fish response. Water SA 26: 319–328.Google Scholar
  53. Strydom, Nadine A., Alan K. Whitfield, and Angus W. Paterson. 2002. Influence of altered freshwater flow regimes on abundance of larval and juvenile Gilchristella aestuaria (Pisces: Clupeidae) in the upper reaches of two South African estuaries. Marine and Freshwater Research 53 (2): 431–438.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MF01077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suthers, Iain M., Jennifer J. Cleary, Stephen C. Battaglene, and Rachael Evans. 1996. Relative RNA content as a measure of condition in larval and juvenile fish. Marine and Freshwater Research 47 (2): 301–307.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9960301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Talbot, Mark, Eugene B. Branch, Stephen A. Marsland, and R. John Watling. 1985. Metal surveys in South African estuaries X. Blind, Ihlanza, Nahoon and Quinera Rivers. Water SA 11: 65–68.Google Scholar
  56. Teodósio, Maria A., Claire B. Paris, Eric Wolanski, and Pedro Morais. 2016. Biophysical processes leading to the ingress of temperate fish larvae into estuarine nursery areas: A review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 183: 187–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.10.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Teodósio, Maria A., Susana Garrido, Janna Peters, Francisco Leitão, Ré Pedro, Álvaro J. Peliz, and A. Miguel P. Santos. 2017. Assessing the impact of environmental forcing on the condition of anchovy larvae in the Cadiz Gulf using nucleic acid and fatty acid-derived indices. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 185: 94–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.10.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Utne-Palm, Anne C. 2002. Visual feeding of fish in a turbid environment: Physical and behavioural aspects. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 35 (1-2): 111–128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10236240290025644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Niekerk, Lara, and Jane Turpie. 2012. Technical report, volume 3: estuary component. South African National Biodiversity Assessment 2011. Vol. 3. Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  60. Vasconcelos, Rita P., Patrick Reis-Santos, Maria J. Costa, and Henrique N. Cabral. 2011. Connectivity between estuaries and marine environment: Integrating metrics to assess estuarine nursery function. Ecological Indicators 11 (5): 1123–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. White, Peter N., and Michael N. Bruton. 1983. Food and feeding mechanisms of Gilchristella aestuarius (Pisces: Clupeidae). South African Journal of Zoology 18 (1): 31–36.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02541858.1983.11447811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whitfield, Alan K., and Trevor D. Harrison. 1996. Gilchristella aestuaria (Pisces: Clupeidae) biomass and consumption of zooplankton in the Sundays estuary. South African Journal of Marine Science 17 (1): 49–53.  https://doi.org/10.2989/025776196784158644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolanski, Eric, Ronald J. Gibbs, Simon Spagnol, Brian King, and Gregg Bunskill. 1998. Inorganic sediment budget in the mangrove-fringed Fly River Delta, Papua New Guinea. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 2 (2): 85–98.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009946600699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugin Bornman
    • 1
  • Nadine Strydom
    • 1
  • Catriona Clemmesen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyNelson Mandela UniversityPort ElizabethSouth Africa
  2. 2.Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research (GEOMAR)KielGermany

Personalised recommendations