Advertisement

Wind-Induced Hydrodynamic Interactions With Aquatic Vegetation in a Fetch-Limited Setting: Implications for Coastal Sedimentation and Protection

  • Anne-Eleonore PaquierEmail author
  • Samuel Meulé
  • Edward J. Anthony
  • Philippe Larroudé
  • Guillaume Bernard
Article

Abstract

Interactions between a patchy degraded Zostera noltei seagrass meadow and waves, currents, and sedimentary processes were analyzed from data obtained from a strongly wind-influenced micro-tidal brackish water lagoon in southeastern France. Measurements were conducted on offshore and foreshore morphology (topography, bathymetry), on hydrodynamics (waves, water levels, and currents) under different wind conditions within and outside the meadow, and on meadow biometry (shoot density, leaf length). The main impact of this patchy meadow on wind-wave transformations seems to be attenuation of waves further offshore than in the absence of vegetation. This attenuation is particularly notable above the meadow front edge, and is related to wave heights, water levels, and wave periods that are, in turn, dependent on wind intensity and fetch length. The data show that the patchy meadow does not attenuate small and short waves, especially when water levels are high, but is capable, like salt marshes and artificial seagrass, of attenuating relatively high and long waves. Notwithstanding its patchy and degraded character, the meadow also strongly influences the vertical distribution of currents. Whereas currents are strong and significantly influenced by wind and wind waves above the meadow, both waves and currents are dissipated in a transitional canopy-water layer. These wave and current modifications are reflected in the evolution of the seabed. Erosion and sedimentation are mainly controlled by the hydrodynamics but the seasonal state of the meadow plays a role by modulating the hydrodynamics. These substrate changes are, important, in turn, in influencing protection of the shoreline.

Keywords

Hydrodynamics Morphodynamics Zostera noltei Seagrass meadows Wind waves Current Turbulence Fetch-limited setting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers and the Associate Editor for their constructive comments and suggestions which have been helpful in improving the manuscript. GIPREB staff (Guillaume Bernard, Nicolas Mayot, Florian Dandine, Vincent Faure) are thanked for the meadow mapping, field assistance, and tide data. Météo France provided the wind data. GLADYS, the French coastal research group, provided some of the instruments deployed in the course of the study. Members of GLADYS (especially Damien Sous), Doriane Delanghe and Thomas Stieglitz, are thanked for the useful discussions.

Funding

A.E. Paquier was provided PhD funding by the “Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur” Region, the European Union, GIPREB (Gestion intégrée, prospective, restauration Etang de Berre), and support from OSU-Institut Pythéas.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 113 mb)

References

  1. Ackerman, J.D., and A. Okubo. 1993. Reduced mixing in a marine macrophyte canopy. Functional Ecology 7 (3): 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M.E., and J.M. Smith. 2014. Wave attenuation by flexible idealized salt marsh vegetation. Coastal Engineering 83: 82–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asano, T., S. Tsutsui, and T. Sakai. 1988. Wave damping characteristics due to seaweed. Proceedings of the 35th coastal engineering conference in Japan. JSCE 138–142. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  4. Asano, T., H. Deguchi, and N. Kobayashi. 1992. Interactions between water waves and vegetation. Proceedings of the 23 rd International Conference on Coastal Engineering. ASCE. 2710–2723.Google Scholar
  5. Auby, I., and P.-J. Labourg. 1996. Seasonal dynamics of Zostera noltii hornem. In the bay of arcachon (France). Journal of Sea Research 35 (4): 269–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(96)90754-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbier, E.B., E.W. Koch, B.R. Silliman, et al. 2008. Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science 319 (5861): 321–323.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard, G., C.F. Boudouresque, and P. Picon. 2007. Long term changes in Zostera meadows in the Berre lagoon (Provence, Mediterranean Sea). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 73 (3-4): 617–629.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boller, M.L., and E. Carrington. 2006. In situ measurements of hydrodynamic forces imposed on Chondrus crispus Stackhouse. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 337 (2): 159–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.06.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borsje, B.W., B.K. van Wesenbeeck, F. Dekker, P. Paalvast, T.J. Bouma, M.M. van Katwijk, and M.B. de Vries. 2011. How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecological Engineering 37 (2): 113–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bos, A.R., T.J. Bouma, G.L.J. de Kort, and M.M. van Katwijk. 2007. Ecosystem engineering by annual intertidal seagrass beds: Sediment accretion and modification. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 74 (1-2): 344–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boscutti, F., I. Marcorin, M. Sigura, E. Bressan, F. Tamberlich, A. Vianello, and V. Casolo. 2015. Distribution modeling of seagrasses in brackish waters of Grado-Marano lagoon (northern Adriatic Sea). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 164: 183–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2015.07.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boudouresque, C.F., G. Pergent, C. Pergent-Martini, S. Ruitton, T. Thibaut, and M. Verlaque. 2016. The necromass of the Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadow: Fate, role, ecosystem services and vulnerability. Hydrobiologia 781 (1): 25–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2333-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouma, T.J., M.B. De Vries, E. Low, G. Peralta, I.C. Tanczos, J. Van de Koppel, and P.M.J. Herman. 2005. Trade-offs related to ecosystem engineering : A case study on stiffness of emerging macrophytes. Ecology 86 (8): 2187–2199.  https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouma, T.J., L.A. van Duren, S. Temmerman, T. Claverie, A. Blanco-Garcia, T. Ysebaert, and P.M.J. Herman. 2007. Spatial flow and sedimentation patterns within patches of epibenthic structures: Combining field, flume and modelling experiments. Continental Shelf Research 27 (8): 1020–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bradley, K., and C. Houser. 2009. Relative velocity of seagrass blades: Implications for wave attenuation in low-energy environments. Journal of Geophysical Research - Earth Surface 114.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000951
  16. Cabaço, S., and R. Santos. 2007. Effects of burial and erosion on the seagrass Zostera noltii. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 340 (2): 204–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavallaro, L., C.L. Re, G. Paratore, A. Viviano, and E. Foti. 2011. Response of Posidonia oceanica to wave motion in shallow-waters. Preliminary experimental results. Coastal Engineering Proceedings 1 (32): 49.  https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v32.waves.49.
  18. Chen, S.-N., L. Sanford, E. Koch, F. Shi, and E. North. 2007. A nearshore model to investigate the effects of seagrass bed geometry on wave attenuation and suspended sediment transport. Estuaries and Coasts 30 (2): 296–310.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02700172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chevallier, A. 1916. L’étang de Berre. Annales de l’Institut Océanographique VII: 90.Google Scholar
  20. Christianen, M. J. A., J. van Belzen, P. M. J. Herman, M. M. van Katwijk, L. P. M. Lamers, P. J. M. van Leent, and T. J. Bouma. 2013. Low-canopy seagrass beds still provide important coastal protection services. PLoS One 8.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062413.
  21. Coulombier, T., U. Neumeier, and P. Bernatchez. 2012. Sediment transport in a cold climate salt marsh (St. Lawrence estuary, Canada), the importance of vegetation and waves. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 101: 64–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.02.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Boer, W.F. 2007. Seagrass-sediment interactions, positive feedbacks and critical thresholds for occurrence: A review. Hydrobiologia 591 (1): 5–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0780-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elginoz, E., M.S. Kabdasli, and A. Tanik. 2011. Effects of Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows on storm waves. Journal of Coastal Research, SI 64: 373–377.Google Scholar
  24. Fonseca, M.S., and J.A. Cahalan. 1992. A preliminary evaluation of wave attenuation by four species of seagrass. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35 (6): 565–576.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(05)80039-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fonseca, M.S., and J.S. Fisher. 1986. A comparison of canopy friction and sediment movement between four species of seagrass with reference to their ecology and restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 29: 15–22.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps029015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fonseca, M.S., and M.A.R. Koehl. 2006. Flow in seagrass canopies: The influence of patch width. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 67 (1-2): 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.09.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fonseca, M.S., J.S. Fisher, J.C. Zieman, and G.W. Thayer. 1982. Influence of the seagrass, Zostera marina L., on current flow. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 15 (4): 351–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(82)90046-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gambi, M.C., A.R.M. Nowell, and P.A. Jumars. 1990. Flume observations on flow dynamics in Zostera marina (eelgrass) beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 61: 159–169.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps061159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ganthy, F., A. Sottolichio, and R. Verney. 2011a. The stability of vegetated tidal flats in a coastal lagoon through quasi in-situ measurements of sediment erodibility. Journal of Coastal Research, SI 64: 1500–1504.Google Scholar
  30. Ganthy, F., A. Sottolichio, and R. Verney. 2011b. Seasonal modification of tidal flat sediment dynamics by seagrass meadows of Zostera noltii (Bassin d’Arcachon, France). Journal of Marine Systems.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2011.11.027.
  31. Gillanders, B. 2006. Seagrasses, Fish, and Fisheries. In Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation, 503–536. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Gratiot, N., A. Gardel, and E.J. Anthony. 2007. Trade-wind waves and mud dynamics on the French Guiana coast, South America: Input from ERA-40 wave data and field investigations. Marine Geology 236 (1-2): 15–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2006.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hansen, J.C.R., and M. Reidenbach. 2012. Wave and tidally driven flows in eelgrass beds and their effect on sediment suspension. Marine Ecology Progress Series 448: 271–287.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hansen, J.C.R., and M. Reidenbach. 2013. Seasonal growth and senescence of a Zostera marina seagrass meadow alters wave-dominated flow and sediment suspension within a Coastal Bay. Estuaries and Coasts 36 (6): 1099–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9620-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hansen, J.C.R., and M. Reidenbach. 2017. Turbulent mixing and fluid transport within Florida bay seagrass meadows. Advances in Water Resources 108: 205–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horikawa, K. 1988. Nearshore Dynamics and Coastal Processes: Theory, Measurement and Predictive Models, Tokyo. University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jadhav, R.S. and Q. Chen, 2012. Field investigation of wave dissipation over salt marsh vegetation during tropical cyclone. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, [S.l.], n. 33, p. waves. 41, Oct. 2012. ISSN 2156–1028.Google Scholar
  38. John, B.M., K.G. Shirlal, S. Rao, and C. Rajasekaran. 2016. Effect of artificial seagrass on wave attenuation and wave run-up. International Journal of Ocean and Climate Systems 7 (1): 14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1759313115623163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kobayashi, N., A.W. Raichle, and T. Asano. 1993. Wave attenuation by vegetation. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 119 (1): 30–48.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1993)119:1(30).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koftis, T., P. Prinos, and V. Stratigaki. 2013. Wave damping over artificial Posidonia oceanica meadow: A large-scale experimental study. Coastal Engineering 73: 71–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2012.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lefebvre, A., C.E.L. Thompson, and C.L. Amos. 2010. Influence of Zostera marina canopies on unidirectional flow, hydraulic roughness and sediment movement. Continental Shelf Research 30 (16): 1783–1794.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2010.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lowe, R. J., J. L. Falter, J. R. Koseff, S. G. Monismith, and M. J. Atkinson. 2007. Spectral wave flow attenuation within submerged canopies: Implications for wave energy dissipation. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans 112.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003605.
  43. Luhar, M., and H. Nepf. 2013. From the blade scale to the reach scale: A characterization of aquatic vegetative drag. Advances in Water Resources 51: 305–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Madsen, J.D., P.A. Chambers, W.F. James, E.W. Koch, and D.F. Westlake. 2001. The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 444 (1/3): 71–84.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017520800568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manca, E., I. Cáceres, J.M. Alsina, V. Stratigaki, I. Townend, and C.L. Amos. 2012. Wave energy and wave-induced flow reduction by full-scale model Posidonia oceanica seagrass. Continental Shelf Research 50–51: 100–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mendez, F.J., and I.J. Losada. 2004. An empirical model to estimate the propagation of random breaking and nonbreaking waves over vegetation fields. Coastal Engineering 51 (2): 103–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2003.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Méndez, F.J., I.J. Losada, and M.A. Losada. 1999. Hydrodynamics induced by wind waves in a vegetation field. Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (C8): 18383–18396.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Möller, I., T. Spencer, J.R. French, D.J. Leggett, and M. Dixon. 1999. Wave transformation over salt marshes: A field and numerical modelling study from North Norfolk, England. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 49 (3): 411–426.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1999.0509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neumeier, U. 2007. Velocity and turbulence variations at the edge of saltmarshes. Continental Shelf Research 27 (8): 1046–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ondiviela, B., I.J. Losada, J.L. Lara, M. Maza, C. Galván, T.J. Bouma, and J. van Belzen. 2014. The role of seagrasses in coastal protection in a changing climate. Coastal Engineering 87: 158–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paquier, A.E., S. Meulé, E.J. Anthony, and G. Bernard. 2014. Sedimentation and erosion patterns in a low shoot-density Zostera noltii meadow in the fetch-limited Berre lagoon, Mediterranean France. Journal of Coastal Research, SI 70: 563–567.  https://doi.org/10.2112/SI70-095.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paquier, A.E., J. Haddad, S. Lawler, and C.M. Ferreira. 2016. Quantification of the attenuation of storm surge components by a coastal wetland of the US mid Atlantic. Estuaries and Coasts 40 (4): 930–946.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0190-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paul, M., and C. L. Amos. 2011. Spatial and seasonal variation in wave attenuation over Zostera noltii. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans 116.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006797.
  54. Paul, M., T.J. Bouma, and C.L. Amos. 2012. Wave attenuation by submerged vegetation: Combining the effect of organism traits and tidal current. Marine Ecology Progress Series 444: 31–41.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peralta, G., L.A. van Duren, E.P. Morris, and T.J. Bouma. 2008. Consequences of shoot-density and stiffness for ecosystem engineering by benthic macrophytes in flow dominated areas : A hydrodynamic flume study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 368: 103–115.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peterson, C.H., R.A. Luettich, F. Micheli, and G.A. Skilleter. 2004. Attenuation of water flow inside seagrass canopies of differing structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series 268: 81–92.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps268081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pujol, D., and H. Nepf. 2012. Breaker-generated turbulence in and above a seagrass meadow. Continental Shelf Research 49: 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rigaud, S. 2011. Dynamique et Biodisponibilité des éléments traces métalliques dans les sédiments de l’étang de Berre. Ph.D. thesis. Université Paul Cézanne.Google Scholar
  59. Sénéchal, N., H. Dupuis, P. Bonneton, H. Howa, and R. Pedreros. 2001. Observation of irregular wave transformation in the surf zone over a gently sloping sandy beach on the French Atlantic coastline. Oceanologica Acta 24 (6): 545–556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(01)01171-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seymour, R., M. Tegner, P. Dayton, and P. Parnell. 1989. Storm wave induced mortality of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, in southern California. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 28 (3): 277–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(89)90018-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Short, A.D., and G. Masselink. 1999. Embayed and structurally controlled beaches. In Handbook of beach and Shoreface Morphodynamics, ed. A.D. Short, 230–250. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  62. Short, F., T. Carruthers, W. Dennison, and M. Waycott. 2007. Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (1-2): 3–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soulsby, R. L., and J. D. Humphery. 1990. Field observations of wave-current interaction at the sea bed. In ed. O. T. Torum, A. Gudmestad, 413–428. Water Wave Kinematics.Google Scholar
  64. Stapelton, D., and L. Huntley. 1995. Seabed stress Determainations using the inertial dissipation Dethord and the turbulent Kenetic energy method. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 20 (9): 807–815.  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290200906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stora, G., and A. Arnoux. 1988. Effects on Mediterranean lagoon macrobenthos of a river diversion: Assessment and analytical review. In Natural and man-made hazards, ed. M.I. El-Sabh and T.S. Murty, 525–546. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stratigaki, V., E. Manca, P. Prinos, I.J. Losada, J.L. Lara, M. Sclavo, C.L. Amos, I. Cáceres, and A. Sánchez-Arcilla. 2011. Large-scale experiments on wave propagation over Posidonia oceanica. Journal of Hydraulic Research 49 (sup1): 31–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2011.583388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Umgiesser, G., M. Sclavo, S. Carniel, and A. Bergamasco. 2004. Exploring the bottom stress variability in the Venice lagoon. Journal of Marine Systems 5 (1-4): 161–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2004.05.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Katwijk, M.M., A.R. Bos, D.C.R. Hermus, and W. Suykerbuyk. 2010. Sediment modification by seagrass beds: Muddification and sandification induced by plant cover and environmental conditions. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 89 (2): 175–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wanless, H.R. 1981. Fining-upwards sedimentary sequences generated in seagrass beds. Journal of Sedimentary Research 51: 445–454.  https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7CA2-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D.Google Scholar
  70. Waycott, M., C.M. Duarte, T.J.B. Carruthers, et al. 2009. Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (30): 12377–12381.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905620106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Widdows, J., N.D. Pope, M.D. Brinsley, H. Asmus, and R.M. Asmus. 2008. Effects of seagrass beds (Zostera noltii and Z. marina) on near-bed hydrodynamics and sediment resuspension. Marine Ecology Progress Series 358: 125–126.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Winterwerp, J.C., R.F. de Graaff, J. Groeneweg, and A.P. Luijendijk. 2007. Modelling of wave damping at Guyana mud coast. Coastal Engineering 54 (3): 249–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2006.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Worcester, S.E. 1995. Effects of eelgrass beds on advection and turbulent mixing in low current and low shoot-density environments. Marine Ecology Progress Series 126: 223–232.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps126223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aix Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, INRA, Coll France, CEREGEAix-en-ProvenceFrance
  2. 2.Grenoble INP (Institute of Engineering University, Grenoble Alpes), CNRS, LEGIUniversity Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.GIPREB (Gestion Intégrée, Prospective et Restauration de l’Étang de Berre) Syndicat MixteBerre l’ÉtangFrance

Personalised recommendations