Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 1234–1248 | Cite as

Seasonality and Ontogenetic Habitat Partitioning of Cownose Rays in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

  • Matthew J. AjemianEmail author
  • Sean P. Powers


The seasonal and spatial heterogeneity of highly mobile mesopredators may play a large structuring role in estuarine dynamics. With a hypothesized relaxation of predation pressure from large sharks, growing populations of cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) have been implicated in negatively affecting shellfish beds across multiple estuaries of the Atlantic coast; however, the pervasiveness of these potential impacts remains poorly understood elsewhere due to a lack of information on cownose ray distribution and seasonality across the species’ range. To better predict cownose ray dynamics in estuaries of the northern Gulf of Mexico, we conducted a multi-scale study using a combination of aerial and gillnet surveys. Cownose ray abundance was highly seasonal along the Mississippi-Alabama shelf, and a significant along-shelf gradient (west-east) in nearshore ray density was observed. This trend was best explained by changes in salinity, with higher abundances best correlated with more estuarine (i.e., lower salinity) conditions in nearshore areas. From north-south across the Alabama shelf, cownose rays displayed strong spatial and seasonal distributional patterns with ontogeny: adults (in particular, females) were primarily restricted to barrier islands and Gulf waters, whereas juveniles and young-of-the-year (YOY) exploited fresher waters of inshore bays protected from large predators. Among inshore locales, cownose ray catch was lowest over oyster habitats and only consisted of YOY rays, suggesting that foraging impacts may be reduced in these structurally complex substrates.


Cownose ray Elasmobranch Mobile bay Gulf of Mexico 



This study would have been impossible without the tremendous field support of various students, interns, and technicians of the Fisheries Ecology Lab and multiple volunteers and staff from the Dauphin Island Sea Lab. In particular, we wish to thank J.M. Drymon, A. Kroetz, M.M. Valentine, C. Louallen-Hightower, J. Herrmann, K. Gregalis, and M.D. Kenworthy for their valuable assistance with capturing specimens and leading gillnet surveys. We are also indebted to advisory members K.L Heck, Jr., J. Valentine, M.R. Heithaus, and P.J. Motta for their valuable comments and input. Historical gillnet data from the coastal Alabama region were graciously supplied by J. Mareska from the Alabama Marine Resources Division. Graduate Fellowship funding and support to MJA was provided by the University of South Alabama Department of Marine Sciences, the Northern Gulf Institute, and the Dauphin Island Sea Lab.


  1. Ajemian M.J., and S.P. Powers. 2012. Habitat-specific feeding by cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Biology of Fishes 95(1): 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajemian M.J., and S.P. Powers. 2013. Foraging effects of cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) along barrier islands of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 439: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajemian M.J., and S.P. Powers. 2014. Towed-float satellite telemetry tracks large-scale movement and habitat connectivity of myliobatid stingrays. Environmental Biology of Fishes 97(9): 1067–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson M.J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 32–46.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson M.J., K.E. Ellingsen, and B.H. McArdle. 2006. Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecology Letters 9: 683–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker, A.S. 2006. Rhinoptera bonasus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2015.2. <>. Downloaded on 30 August 2015.
  7. Bethea D.M., M.J. Ajemian, J.K. Carlson, E.R. Hoffmayer, G.H. Burgess, J.L. Imhoff, and R.D. Grubbs. 2014. Distribution and community structure of coastal sharks in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Biology of Fishes 98: 1233–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bigelow H.B., and W.C. Schroeder. 1953. Sawfishes, guitarfishes, skates and rays. In Fishes of the western North Atlantic, ed. J. Tee-van, 1–514. New Haven: Sears Foundation for Marine Research.Google Scholar
  9. Blaylock R.A. 1989. A massive school of cownose rays, Rhinoptera bonasus (Rhinopteridae), in lower Chesapeake Bay, Virginia. Copeia 1989: 744–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaylock R.A. 1993. Distribution and abundance of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 16: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunner C., J. Beall, S. Bentley, and Y. Furukawa. 2006. Hypoxia hotspots in the Mississippi Bight. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 36: 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke K.R. 1993. Non-paramentric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins A., M. Heupel, and C. Simpfendorfer. 2008. Spatial distribution and long-term movement patterns of cownose rays Rhinoptera bonasus within an estuarine river. Estuaries and Coasts 31: 1174–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins A.B., M.R. Heupel, R.E. Hueter, and P.J. Motta. 2007a. Hard prey specialists or opportunistic generalists? An examination of the diet of the cownose ray Rhinoptera bonasus. Marine and Freshwater Research 58: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins A.B., M.R. Heupel, and P.J. Motta. 2007b. Residence and movement patterns of cownose rays Rhinoptera bonasus within a south-west Florida estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 71: 1159–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig J.K., P.C. Gillikin, M.A. Magelnicki, and L.N. May. 2010. Habitat use of cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) in a highly productive, hypoxic continental shelf ecosystem. Fisheries Oceanography 19: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dean M.N., J.J. Bizzarro, and A.P. Summers. 2007. The evolution of cranial design, diet, and feeding mechanisms in batoid fishes. Integrative and Comparative Biology 47: 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drymon J.M. 2010. Distributions of coastal sharks in the northern Gulf of Mexico: consequences for trophic transfer and foodweb dynamics, 224 p. PhD dissertation: University of South Alabama, Mobile.Google Scholar
  19. Drymon J.M., L. Carassou, S.P. Powers, M. Grace, J. Dindo, and B. Dzwonkowski. 2013. Multiscale analysis of factors that affect the distribution of sharks throughout the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fishery Bulletin 111: 370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Estes J.A., and C.H. Peterson. 2000. Marine ecological research in seashore and seafloor systems: accomplishments and future directions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 195: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fegley S.R., C.H. Peterson, N.R. Geraldi, and D.W. Gaskill. 2009. Enhancing the potential for population recovery: restoration options for bay scallop populations, Argopecten irradians concentricus, in North Carolina. Journal of Shellfish Research 28: 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fisher R.A., G.C. Call, and R.D. Grubbs. 2011. Cownose ray (Rhinoptera bonasus) predation relative to bivalve ontogeny. Journal of Shellfish Research 30: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flemer D., W. Kruczynski, B. Ruth, and C. Bundrick. 1999. The relative influence of hypoxia, anoxia, and associated environmental factors as determinants of macrobenthic community structure in a northern Gulf of Mexico estuary. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery (Formerly Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health) 6: 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodman M.A., P.B. Conn, and E. Fitzpatrick. 2010. Seasonal occurrence of cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) in North Carolina’s estuarine and coastal waters. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 640–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grubbs R.D. 2010. Ontogenetic shifts in movements and habitat use. In Sharks and their relatives II: Biodiversity, adaptive physiology, and conservation, eds. J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick, and M.R. Heithaus, 319–350. Boca Raton: CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grusha D.S. 2005. Investigation of the life history of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus (Mitchill 1815). Williamsburg: College of William and Mary.Google Scholar
  27. Heip C.H.R., N.K. Goosen, P.M.J. Herman, J. Kromkamp, J. Middleburg, and K. Soetaert. 1995. Production and consumption of biological particles in temperate tidal estuaries. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 33: 1–149.Google Scholar
  28. Heithaus, M. R. 2007. Nursery areas as essential shark habitats: A theoretical perspective. Pages 3–13 in C. T. McCandless, N. E. Kohler, and H. L. Pratt Jr, editors. Shark Nursery Grounds of the Gulf of Mexico and East Coast Waters of the United States. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society Symposium.Google Scholar
  29. Heupel M.R., J.K. Carlson, and C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2007. Shark nursery areas: concepts, definition, characterization and assumptions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 337: 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ingram Jr., G.W., W. Richards, J. Lamkin, and B. Muhling. 2010. Annual indices of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) larvae in the Gulf of Mexico developed using delta-lognormal and multivariate models. Aquatic Living Resources 23: 35–47.Google Scholar
  31. Kolmann, M.A., D.R. Huber, P.J. Motta, and R.D. Grubbs. 2015. Feeding biomechanics of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, over ontogeny. Journal of Anatomy 227: 341–351.Google Scholar
  32. Le Port A., S. Lavery, and J.C. Montgomery. 2012. Conservation of coastal stingrays: seasonal abundance and population structure of the short-tailed stingray Dasyatis brevicaudata at a marine protected area. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69: 1427–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lima S.L., and L.M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions make under risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lo N., L. Jacobson, and J. Squire. 1992. Indices of relative abundance from fish spotter data based on delta-lognormal models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 2515–2526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McEachran, J.D., and M.R. de Carvalho. 2002. Myliobatidae, In The living marine resources of the Western Central Atlantic. Introduction, molluscs, crustaceans, hagfishes, sharks, batoid fishes and chimaeras. ed. K.E. Carpenter, pp. 578–585. FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes and American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Special Publication No. 5, Rome.Google Scholar
  36. Mittlebach G.G., and L. Perrson. 1998. The ontogeny of piscivory and its ecological consequences. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1454–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myers R.A., J.K. Baum, T.D. Shepherd, S.P. Powers, and C.H. Peterson. 2007. Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315: 1846–1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neer J.A. 2005. Aspects of the life history, ecophysiology, bioenergetics, and population dynamics of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in the northern Gulf of Mexico, in oceanography and coastal sciences, 134. Lousiana: State.Google Scholar
  39. Neer J.A., and B.A. Thompson. 2005. Life history of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in the northern Gulf of Mexico, with comments on geographic variability in life history traits. Environmental Biology of Fishes 73: 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Notarbartolo-di-Sciara G., and E.V. Hillyer. 1989. Mobulid rays of the eastern Venezuela (Chondrichthyes, Mobulidae). Copeia 3: 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orth R. 1975. Destruction of eelgrass, zostera marina, by the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in Chesapeake Bay. Chespeake Science 16: 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peterson C.H. 1982. Clam predation by whelks (Buscyon spp.): experimental tests of the importance of prey size, prey density, and seagrass cover. Marine Biology 66(2): 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson C.H., F.J. Fodrie, H.C. Summerson, and S.P. Powers. 2001. Site-specific and density-dependent extinction of prey by schooling rays: generation of a population sink in top-quality habitat for bay scallops. Oecologia 129: 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poulakis G.R. 2013. Reproductive biology of the cownose ray in the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 5: 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Powers S.P., and D. Gaskill. 2003. Final report: Bay scallop-cownose ray interactions, 25 p. Morehead City: North Carolina Fishery Resources Program.Google Scholar
  46. Rogers C., C. Roden, R. Lohoefener, K. Mullin, and W. Hoggard. 1990. Behavior, distribution, and relative abundance of cownose ray schools Rhinoptera bonasus in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Northeast Gulf Science 11: 69–76.Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz F. 1964. Effects of winter water conditions on fifteen species of captive marine fishes. American Midland Naturalist 71: 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwartz F.J. 1990. Mass migratory congregations and movements of several species of cownose rays, genus Rhinoptera: a world-wide review. The Journal of Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 106: 10–13.Google Scholar
  49. Shepherd T.D., and R.A. Meyers. 2005. Direct and indirect fishery effects on small coastal elasmobranchs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Ecology Letters 8: 1095–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sims D.W., E. Southall, A. Richardson, P. Reid, and J. Metcalfe. 2003. Seasonal movements and behaviour of basking sharks from archival tagging: no evidence of winter hibernation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 248: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith J.W., and J.V. Merriner. 1985. Food habits and feeding behavior of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 8: 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith J.W., and J.V. Merriner. 1987. Age and growth, movements and distribution of the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 10: 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sponaugle S., and P. Lawton. 1990. Portunid crab predation on juvenile hard clams: effects of substrate type and prey density. Marine Ecology Progress Series 67: 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wearmouth V.J., and D.W. Sims. 2008. Sexual segregation in marine fish, reptiles, birds and mammals: behavior patterns, mechanisms and conservation implications. Advances in Marine Biology 54: 101–170.Google Scholar
  55. Weng K.C., D.G. Foley, J.E. Ganong, C. Perle, G.L. Shillinger, and B.A. Block. 2008. Migration of an upper trophic level predator, the salmon shark Lamna ditropis, between distant ecoregions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 372: 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico StudiesTexas A&M University-Corpus ChristiCorpus ChristiUSA
  2. 2.University of South Alabama and Dauphin Island Sea LabDauphin IslandUSA
  3. 3.Florida Atlantic University, Harbor Branch Oceanographic InsituteFort PierceUSA

Personalised recommendations