Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 664–681 | Cite as

Long-Term Trends of Nutrients and Phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay

  • L. W. HardingJr.Email author
  • C. L. Gallegos
  • E. S. Perry
  • W. D. Miller
  • J. E. Adolf
  • M. E. Mallonee
  • H. W. Paerl
Article

Abstract

Climate effects on hydrology impart high variability to water-quality properties, including nutrient loadings, concentrations, and phytoplankton biomass as chlorophyll-a (chl-a), in estuarine and coastal ecosystems. Resolving long-term trends of these properties requires that we distinguish climate effects from secular changes reflecting anthropogenic eutrophication. Here, we test the hypothesis that strong climatic contrasts leading to irregular dry and wet periods contribute significantly to interannual variability of mean annual values of water-quality properties using in situ data for Chesapeake Bay. Climate effects are quantified using annual freshwater discharge from the Susquehanna River together with a synoptic climatology for the Chesapeake Bay region based on predominant sea-level pressure patterns. Time series of water-quality properties are analyzed using historical (1945–1983) and recent (1984–2012) data for the bay adjusted for climate effects on hydrology. Contemporary monitoring by the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) provides data for a period since mid-1984 that is significantly impacted by anthropogenic eutrophication, while historical data back to 1945 serve as historical context for a period prior to severe impairments. The generalized additive model (GAM) and the generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) are developed for nutrient loadings and concentrations (total nitrogen—TN, nitrate + nitrate—NO2 + NO3) at the Susquehanna River and water-quality properties in the bay proper, including dissolved nutrients (NO2 + NO3, orthophosphate—PO4), chl-a, diffuse light attenuation coefficient (K D (PAR)), and chl-a/TN. Each statistical model consists of a sum of nonlinear functions to generate flow-adjusted time series and compute long-term trends accounting for climate effects on hydrology. We present results identifying successive periods of (1) eutrophication ca. 1945–1980 characterized by approximately doubled TN and NO2 + NO3 loadings, leading to increased chl-a and associated ecosystem impairments, and (2) modest decreases of TN and NO2 + NO3 loadings from 1981 to 2012, signaling a partial reversal of nutrient over-enrichment. Comparison of our findings with long-term trends of water-quality properties for a variety of estuarine and coastal ecosystems around the world reveals that trends for Chesapeake Bay are weaker than for other systems subject to strenuous management efforts, suggesting that more aggressive actions than those undertaken to date will be required to counter anthropogenic eutrophication of this valuable resource.

Keywords

Estuaries Chesapeake Bay Long-term trends Hydrology Eutrophication Water quality Phytoplankton Nutrients Chlorophyll 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Dr. Jim Hagy of the EPA Gulf Breeze Laboratory for providing data from his Ph.D. Dissertation and to Dr. Bob Hirsch and his colleagues at the US Geological Survey for providing data on nutrient concentrations and loadings from the Nontidal Monitoring Program. Rich Batiuk and Gary Shenk of the EPA Chesapeake Bay Program provided point-source nutrient estimates and helpful comments on the manuscript. Detailed comments and suggestions by two anonymous reviewers significantly improved the manuscript. LWH was supported by the NSF Biological Oceanography Program and the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Program Office. HWP was supported by the NSF Biological Oceanography Program, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, ModMon and FerryMon Projects, and the Strategic Environmental Defense and Development Program (SERDP) of the Department of Defense.

References

  1. Acker, J.G., L.W. Harding, G. Leptoukh, T. Zhu, and S. Shen. 2005. Remotely-sensed chl a at the Chesapeake Bay mouth is correlated with annual freshwater flow to Chesapeake Bay. Geophysical Research Letters 32(L05601): 2005. doi: 10.1029/2004GL021852.Google Scholar
  2. Adolf, J.E., C.L. Yeager, W.D. Miller, M.E. Mallonee, and L.W. Harding Jr. 2006. Environmental forcing of phytoplankton floral composition, biomass, and primary productivity in Chesapeake Bay, USA. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 67: 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.H., and D.J. Conley. 2009. Eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: towards better understanding and management strategies. Hydrobiologia 629: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anonymous. 2000. Directive 200/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal L 327/1.Google Scholar
  5. Boicourt, W.C. 1992. Influence of circulation processes on dissolved oxygen in the Chesapeake Bay. In Oxygen dynamics in Chesapeake Bay: a synthesis of research, ed. D. Smith, M. Leffler, G. Mackiernan, 7–53. College Park: University of Maryland Sea Grant.Google Scholar
  6. Boynton, W.R., and W.M. Kemp. 2000. Influence of river flow and nutrient loads on selected ecosystem processes: a synthesis of Chesapeake Bay data. In Estuarine science, a synthetic approach to research and practice, ed. J.E. Hobbie, 269–298. Washington: Island.Google Scholar
  7. Boynton, W.R., J.H. Garber, R. Summers, and W.M. Kemp. 1995. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries. Estuaries 18: 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bricker, S., B. Longstaff, W. Dennison, A. Jones, K. Boicourt, C. Wicks, and J. Woerner. 2007. Effects of nutrient enrichment in the Nation’s estuaries: a decade of change. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 26. National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. 328 p.Google Scholar
  9. Brush, G.S. 2009. Historical land use, nitrogen, and coastal eutrophication: a paleoecological perspective. Estuaries and Coasts 32: 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carstensen, J., D.J. Conley, J.H. Andersen, and G. Ærtebjerg. 2006. Coastal eutrophication and trend reversal: a Danish case study. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 398–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carstensen, J., M. Sanchez-Camacho, C.M. Duarte, D. Krause-Jensen, and N. Marba. 2011. Connecting the dots: responses of coastal ecosystems to changing nutrient concentrations. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 9122–9132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cloern, J.E. 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 210: 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cloern, J., and A. Jassby. 2010. Patterns and scales of phytoplankton variability in estuarine–coastal ecosystems. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cloern, J.E., A.E. Alpine, B.E. Cole, R.L.J. Wong, J.F. Arthur, and M.D. Ball. 1983. River discharge controls phytoplankton dynamics in the northern San Francisco Bay Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 16: 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collos, Y., B. Bec, C. Jauzein, E. Abadie, T. Laugier, J. Lautier, A. Pastoureaud, P. Souchu, and A. Vaquer. 2009. Oligotrophication and emergence of picocyanobacteria and a toxic dinoflagellate in Thau lagoon, southern France. Journal of Sea Research 61: 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conley, D.J., H.W. Paerl, R.W. Howarth, D.F. Boesch, S.P. Seitzinger, K.E. Havens, C. Lancelot, and G.E. Likens. 2009. Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science 323: 1014–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duarte, C.M., D.J. Conley, J. Carstensen, and M. Sanchez-Camacho. 2009. Return to Neverland: shifting baselines affect eutrophication restoration targets. Estuaries and Coasts 32: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, T.R., L.W. Harding Jr., D.W. Stanley, and L.G. Ward. 1988. Phytoplankton, nutrients, and turbidity in the Chesapeake, Delaware, and Hudson estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 27: 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher, T.R., E.R. Peele, J.W. Ammerman, and L.W. Harding Jr. 1992. Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 82: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher, T.R., A.B. Gustafson, K. Sellner, R. Lacouture, L.W. Haas, R. Magnien, R. Karrh, and B. Michael. 1999. Spatial and temporal variation in resource limitation in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Biology 133: 763–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallegos, C. L., P. J. Werdell, and C. R. McClain. 2011. Long-term changes in light scattering in Chesapeake Bay inferred from Secchi depth, light attenuation, and remote sensing measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research 116: C00H08, doi:10.1029/JC2011007160.Google Scholar
  22. Groisman, P.Y., R.W. Knight, and T.R. Karl. 2001. Heavy precipitation and high streamflow in the contiguous United States: trends in the twentieth century. Bulletin American Meteorological Society 82: 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groisman, P.Y., R.W. Knight, T.R. Karl, D.R. Easterling, B. Sun, and J.H. Lawrimore. 2004. Contemporary changes of the hydrological cycle over the contiguous United States: trends derived from in situ observations. Journal of Hydrometeorology 5: 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagy III, J.D., W.R. Boynton, C.W. Wood, and K.V. Wood. 2004. Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow. Estuaries and Coasts 27: 634–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harding Jr., L.W., and E.S. Perry. 1997. Long-term increase of phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–1994. Marine Ecology Progress Series 157: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harding Jr., L.W., B.W. Meeson, and T.R. Fisher Jr. 1986. Phytoplankton production in two east coast estuaries: photosynthesis-light functions and patterns of carbon assimilation in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 23: 773–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harding Jr., L.W., A. Magnuson, and M.E. Mallonee. 2005. SeaWiFS retrievals of chlorophyll in Chesapeake Bay and the mid-Atlantic bight. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 62: 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harding Jr., L.W., R.A. Batiuk, T.R. Fisher, C.L. Gallegos, T.C. Malone, W.D. Miller, M.R. Mulholland, H. Paerl, E.S. Perry, and P. Tango. 2014. Multiple lines of evidence for numerical chlorophyll (chl-a) criteria in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harding Jr., L.W., J.E. Adolf, M.E. Mallonee, W.D. Miller, C.L. Gallegos, E.S. Perry, J.M. Johnson, K.R. Sellner, and H.W. Paerl. 2015. Climate effects on phytoplankton floral composition in Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.12.030.Google Scholar
  30. Hirsch, R.M., D.L. Moyer, and S.A. Archfield. 2010. Weighted regressions on time, discharge, and season (WRTDS), with an application to Chesapeake Bay river inputs. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 857–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howarth, R.W., D. Swaney, T.J. Butler, and R. Marino. 2000. Climatic control on eutrophication of the Hudson River estuary. Ecosystems 3: 210–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howarth, R.W., D.P. Swaney, E.W. Boyer, R. Marino, N. Jaworski, and C. Goodale. 2006. The influence of climate on average nitrogen export from large watersheds in the Northeastern United States. Biogeochemistry 79: 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jassby, A.D., and J.E. Cloern. 2014. wq: some tools for exploring water quality monitoring data. R package version 0.4-1. http://cran.r-project.org/package=wq.
  34. Kemp, W.M., W.R. Boynton, J.E. Adolf, D.F. Boesch, W.C. Boicourt, G. Brush, J.C. Cornwell, T.R. Fisher, P.M. Glibert, J.D. Hagy, L.W. Harding Jr., E.D. Houde, D.G. Kimmel, W.D. Miller, R.I.E. Newell, M.R. Roman, R.M. Smith, and J.C. Stevenson. 2005. Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 303: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kimmel, D.G., W.D. Miller, and M.R. Roman. 2006. Regional scale climate forcing of mesozooplankton dynamics in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kimmel, D.G., W.D. Miller, L.W. Harding Jr., E.D. Houde, and M.R. Roman. 2009. Estuarine ecosystem response captured using a synoptic climatology for Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and Coasts 32: 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langland, M.J., P.L. Lietman, P.L., and S.A. Hoffman. 1995. Synthesis of nutrient and sediment data for watersheds within the Chesapeake Bay drainage basin. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4233, 121 p.Google Scholar
  38. Langland, M., J. Blomquist, D. Moyer, and K. Hyer. 2012. Nutrient and suspended-sediment trends, loads, and yields and development of an indicator of streamwater quality at nontidal sites in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, 1985–2010. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5093, 26 p.Google Scholar
  39. Malone T.C. 1992. Effects of water column processes on dissolved oxygen: nutrients, phytoplankton and zooplankton. In Oxygen dynamics in Chesapeake Bay: a synthesis of research, ed. D. Smith, M. Leffler, and G. Mackiernan, 61–112. College Park: University of Maryland Sea Grant.Google Scholar
  40. Malone, T.C., L.H. Crocker, S.E. Pike, and B.W. Wendler. 1988. Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 48: 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malone, T.C., D.J. Conley, T.R. Fisher, P.M. Glibert, and L.W. Harding Jr. 1996. Scales of nutrient limited phytoplankton productivity in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 19: 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, W.D., and L.W. Harding Jr. 2007. Climate forcing of the spring bloom in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 331: 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, W.D., L.W. Harding Jr., and J.E. Adolf. 2006a. Hurricane Isabel generated an unusual fall bloom in Chesapeake Bay. Geophysical Research Letters 33(L06612): 2006. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025658.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, W.D., D.G. Kimmel, and L.W. Harding Jr. 2006b. Predicting spring discharge of the Susquehanna River from a winter synoptic climatology for the eastern United States. Water Resources Research 42(W05414): 2006. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004270.Google Scholar
  45. Moyer, D.L., RM. Hirsch, and K.E. Hyer. 2012. Comparison of two regression-based approaches for determining nutrient and sediment fluxes and trends in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5244, 118 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5244/).
  46. Mozetić, P., C. Solidoro, G. Cossarini, G. Socal, R. Precali, J. France, F. Bianchi, C. De Vittor, N. Smodlaka, and S. Fonda Umani. 2010. Recent trends towards oligotrophication of the Northern Adriatic: evidence from chlorophyll a time series. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 362–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Murphy, R.R., W.M. Kemp, and W.P. Ball. 2011. Long-term trends in Chesapeake Bay seasonal hypoxia, stratification, and nutrient loading. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 1293–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Najjar, R.G., C.R. Pyke, M.B. Adams, D. Breitburg, C. Hershner, M. Kemp, R. Howarth, M.R. Mulholland, M. Paolisso, D. Secor, K. Sellner, D. Wardrop, and R. Wood. 2010. Potential climate-change impacts on Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 86: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nishikawa, T., Y. Hori, S. Nagai, K. Miyahara, Y. Nakamura, K. Harada, M. Tanda, and T. Tada. 2010. Nutrient and phytoplankton dynamics in Harima-Nada, eastern Seto Inland Sea, Japan during a 35-year period from 1973 to 2007. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 224–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nixon, S.W. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia 41: 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nixon, S.W. 2009. Eutrophication and the macroscope. Hydrobiologia 629: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paerl, H.W., J.D. Bales, L.W. Ausley, C.P. Buzzelli, L.B. Crowder, L.A. Eby, J.M. Fear, M. Go, B.L. Peierls, T.L. Richardson, and J.S. Ramus. 2001. Ecosystem impacts of three sequential hurricanes (Dennis, Floyd, and Irene) on the United States’ largest lagoonal estuary, Pamlico Sound, NC. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 5655–5660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paerl, H.W., L.M. Valdes, M.F. Piehler, and M.E. Lebo. 2004. Solving problems resulting from solutions: the evolution of a dual nutrient management strategy for the eutrophying Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. Environmental Science and Technology 38: 3068–3073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paerl, H.W., L.M. Valdes, B.L. Peierls, J.E. Adolf, and L.W. Harding Jr. 2006a. Anthropogenic and climatic influences on the eutrophication of large estuarine ecosystems. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paerl, H.W., L.M. Valdes, A.R. Joyner, B.L. Peierls, C.P. Buzzelli, M.F. Piehler, S.R. Riggs, R.R. Christian, J.S. Ramus, E.J. Clesceri, L.A. Eby, L.W. Crowder, and R.A. Luettich. 2006b. Ecological response to hurricane events in the Pamlico Sound System, NC and implications for assessment and management in a regime of increased frequency. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paerl, H.W., K.L. Rossignol, N.S. Hall, B.L. Peierls, and M.S. Wetz. 2010. Phytoplankton community indicators of short- and long-term ecological change in the anthropogenically and climatically impacted Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paerl, H.W., S.N. Hall, B.L. Peierls, K.L. Rossignol, and A.R. Joyner. 2013. Hydrologic variability and its control of phytoplankton community structure and function in two shallow, coastal, lagoonal ecosystems: the Neuse and New River estuaries, North Carolina, USA. Estuaries and Coasts. doi: 10.1007/s12237-013-9686-0.Google Scholar
  58. Peierls, B.L., R.R. Christian, and H.W. Paerl. 2003. Water quality and phytoplankton as indicators of hurricane impacts on a large estuarine ecosystem. Estuaries 26: 1329–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peierls, B.L., N.S. Hall, and H.W. Paerl. 2012. Non-monotonic responses of phytoplankton biomass accumulation to hydrologic variability: a comparison of two coastal plain North Carolina estuaries. Estuaries and Coasts 35: 1376–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Prasad, M.B., M.R.P. Sapiano, C.R. Anderson, W. Long, and R. Murtugudde. 2010. Long-term variability of nutrients and chlorophyll in the Chesapeake Bay: a retrospective analysis, 1985–2008. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 1128–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riemann, B., J. Carstensen, K. Dahl, H. Fossing, J.W. Hansen, H.H. Jakobsen, A.B. Josefson, D. Krause-Jensen, S. Markager, P.A. Stæhr, K. Timmermann, J. Windolf, and J.H. Andersen. 2015. Recovery of Danish coastal ecosystems after reductions in nutrient loading: a holistic approach. Estuaries and Coasts. doi: 10.1007/s12237-015-9980-0.Google Scholar
  62. Roman, M.R., W.C. Boicourt, D.G. Kimmel, W.D. Miller, J.E. Adolf, L.W. Harding Jr., E.D. Houde, S. Jung, and X. Zhang. 2005. Chesapeake Bay plankton and fish enhanced by Hurricane Isabel. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 86: 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trenberth, K. E., Jones, P. D., Ambenje, P., Bojariu, R., Easterling, D., Klein, T. A., Parker, D., Rahimzadeh, F., Renwick, J. A., Rusticucci, M., Soden, B., and Zhai, P. 2007. Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change. In Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller, 235–336. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1987. 1987 Chesapeake Bay agreement. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland.Google Scholar
  65. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Ambient water quality criteria for dissolved oxygen, water clarity and chlorophyll a for Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries. EPA 903-R-03-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  66. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Chesapeake Bay phase 5.3 community watershed model. EPA 903S10002 - CBP/TRS-303-10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  67. Valdes-Weaver, L.M., M.F. Piehler, J.L. Pinckney, K.E. Howe, K. Rossignol, and H.W. Paerl. 2006. Long-term temporal and spatial trends in phytoplankton biomass and class-level taxonomic composition in the hydrologically variable Neuse–Pamlico estuarine continuum, North Carolina, U.S.A. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 1410–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wetz, M.S., and H.W. Paerl. 2008. Estuarine phytoplankton responses to hurricanes and tropical storms with different characteristics. Estuaries and Coasts 31: 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams, M.W., S. Filoso, B.J. Longstaff, and W.C. Dennison. 2010. Long-term trends of water quality and biotic metrics in Chesapeake Bay: 1986 to 2008. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 1279–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wood, S.N. 2004. Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99: 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wood, S.N. 2006a. Generalized additive models (an introduction with R), 392. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  72. Wood, S.N. 2006b. Low rank scale invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additive mixed models. Biometrics 62: 1025–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yarnal, B. 1993. Synoptic climatology in environmental analysis. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  74. Zhou, Y., D. Scavia, and A.M. Michalak. 2014. Nutrient loading and meteorological conditions explain interannual variability of hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay. Limnology and Oceanography 59: 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. W. HardingJr.
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. L. Gallegos
    • 2
  • E. S. Perry
    • 3
  • W. D. Miller
    • 4
  • J. E. Adolf
    • 5
  • M. E. Mallonee
    • 6
  • H. W. Paerl
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  3. 3.HuntingtownUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Naval Research LaboratoryWashingtonUSA
  5. 5.Marine Science ProgramUniversity of Hawaii at HiloHiloUSA
  6. 6.United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program OfficeInterstate Commission on the Potomac River BasinAnnapolisUSA
  7. 7.Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillMorehead CityUSA

Personalised recommendations