Transient small boats as a long-distance coastal vector for dispersal of biofouling organisms
Alaska is at the northern end of an apparent latitudinal trend of decreasing coastal marine introductions on the West Coast of North America. Historical propagule supply may have played a role in forming this trend, but few studies have evaluated propagule supply to northern latitudes. Here, we examined the role of small boat traffic as a mechanism of long-distance spread for nonindigenous species (NIS) into coastal Alaska. We used a combination of public records, marina surveys, and boater interviews to characterize vessel traffic patterns and boater behaviors. In-water SCUBA sampling of recently arrived transient boats provided data on extent, richness, composition, and biogeography of biofouling incursions to Alaska from outside of the state. We documented a striking seasonality and directionality of vessel traffic, and most vessels were on voyages of >900 km. Most transient vessels sampled had few organisms, although one third had >100 organisms on submerged surfaces. Several NIS were recorded, including two that are not known to be established in Alaska (Watersipora subtorquata and Amphibalanus improvisus). The seasonal northward pulse of vessels and their cumulative biofouling species represent an important incursion mechanism for species yet to establish at the northern edge of a marine bioinvasion front in the northeastern Pacific. The low numbers of NIS sampled in this study coincide with the low number of marine NIS known from Alaska, which suggests that an opportunity remains to promote awareness and management of the vector to limit NIS influx to the region. This may be particularly relevant for future scenarios of increased vessel traffic and ocean warming, which are likely to interact to increase establishment success of invaders from the south.
KeywordsAnthropogenic transport Biofouling Introduced Latitudinal gradient Nonindigenous species Vector
- Carlton, J.T. 1985. Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: The biology of ballast water. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review 23: 313–371.Google Scholar
- Cohen, A.N. 2005. Guide to the exotic species of San Francisco Bay. San Francisco Estuary Institute, Oakland, CA. www.exoticsguide.org. Accessed 10 Aug 2013.
- Davidson, I., Zabin, C., Chang, A., Sytsma, M., and G. Ruiz. 2008. Characterizing the risk of species transfers on recreational boats in marine systems via hull fouling: A pilot study. Final report, US Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
- deRivera, C.E., G.M. Ruiz, A.H. Hines, and P. Jivoff. 2006. Biotic resistance to invasion: Native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology 86: 3367–3376.Google Scholar
- Fofonoff, P., G.M. Ruiz, B. Steves, and J.T. Carlton. 2003. In ships or on ships? Mechanisms of transfer and invasions for non-native species to the coasts of North America. In Invasive species: Vectors and management strategies, ed. G.M. Ruiz and J.T. Carlton, 152–182. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Godwin, L.S., Eldredge, L.G., and K. Gaut. 2004. The assessment of hull fouling as a mechanism for the introduction and dispersal of marine alien species in the main Hawaiian Islands. Bishop Museum Technical Report, No. 28. Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
- Hewitt, C.L., and M.L. Campbell. 2009. Assessment of relative contribution of vectors to the introduction and translocation of marine invasive species. Final report, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Tasmania.Google Scholar
- Marelli, D.C. 1981. New records for Caprellidae in California, and notes on a morphological variant of Caprella verrucosa Boeck, 1871. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 94: 654–662.Google Scholar
- McClory, J., and T. Gotthardt. 2008. Non-native and invasive animals of Alaska: A comprehensive list and select species status reports. Alaska Natural Heritage Program, Environmental and Natural Resources Institute, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/species/nonnative/invasive/pdfs/invasivespp_report.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2013.
- NEMESIS. 2013. National Estuarine and Marine Exotic Species Information System. Housed at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Marine Invasions Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Pilgrim, E.M., and J.A. Darling. 2010. Genetic diversity in two introduced biofouling amphipods (Ampithoe valida & Jassa marmorata) along the Pacific North American coast: investigation into molecular identification and cryptic diversity. Diversity and Distribution 16: 827–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz, G.M., and C.L. Hewitt. 2009. Latitudinal patterns of biological invasions in marine ecosystems: A polar perspective. In Smithsonian at the Poles: Contributions to International Polar Year Science, ed. I. Krupnik, M.A. Lang, and S.E. Miller, 347–358. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz, G., Huber, T., Larson, K., McCann, L., Steves, B., Fofonoff, P., and A.H. Hines. 2006. Biological invasions in Alaska’s coastal marine ecosystems: Establishing a baseline. Final report, Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council & US Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.pwsrcac.org/programs/marine-invasive-species/studies/. Accessed 10 Aug 2013.
- Sax, D.F. 2001. Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: Implications for biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 28: 131–150.Google Scholar
- Tepolt, C.K., J.A. Darling, M.J. Bagley, J.B. Geller, M.J. Blum, and E.D. Grosholz. 2009. European green crabs (Carcinus maenas) in the northeastern Pacific: Genetic evidence for high population connectivity and current-mediated expansion from a single introduced source population. Diversity and Distribution 15: 997–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar