Will Offshore Energy Face “Fair Winds and Following Seas”?: Understanding the Factors Influencing Offshore Wind Acceptance
- 521 Downloads
Most offshore energy studies have focused on measuring or explaining people’s perceptions of, and reactions to, specific installations. However, there are two different types of acceptance: one surrounds the siting of projects while the other surrounds a more general acceptance of offshore energy. Understanding what drives this second type of acceptance is important as governments have implemented new financial incentives and policies to support renewable energy development; however, citizens and government officials may be increasingly opposed to some of these support mechanisms. Our paper fills a void in the literature by using regression approaches to better understand how people’s evaluations of the benefits and costs of offshore wind impact their level of general acceptance for offshore wind, while controlling for other factors (e.g., demographics). This analysis should help policy makers, and individuals attempting to educate the general public about renewable energy, to better understand the important factors influencing people’s support or opposition to offshore wind energy initiatives.
KeywordsOffshore wind power Public acceptance
- Acheson, J. 2012. Attitudes toward offshore wind power in the Midcoast Region of Maine. Maine Policy Review 21(2): 42–55.Google Scholar
- Allen, E., and C.A. Seaman. 2007. Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress 40: 64–65.Google Scholar
- American Council on Renewable Energy. 2010. Renewable Energy in Maine http://www.hpba.org/government-affairs/renewableenergy/pdfs/Maine.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2014.
- Anderson, M.W., C. Noblet, and M. Teisl. 2012. Our environment. A glimpse at what Mainers value. Maine Policy Review 21(1): 104–110.Google Scholar
- Carrington, D. 2012. Local opposition to onshore windfarms has tripled, poll shows. The Guardian (February 29).Google Scholar
- Chervinsky, G. 2006. The State House news poll, May. Boston, MA: State House News Service. http://www.statehousenews.com/.
- Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2009. Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design methods, 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- DMR (Maine Department of Marine Resources). 2012. Preliminary 2012 commercial Maine landings by live pounds. http://www.maine.gov/dmr/commercialfishing/documents/2012PoundsPie.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2013.
- DSIRE (Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency). 2012a. Financial incentives for renewable energy. N.C. Solar Center, N.C. State University and the Interstate Renewable Energy Council. http://www.dsireusa.org/summarytables/finre.cfm. Accessed on 7 May 2012.
- DSIRE (Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency). 2012b. Rules, regulations & policies for renewable energy. N.C. Solar Center, N.C. State University and the Interstate Renewable Energy Council. http://www.dsireusa.org/summarytables/rrpre.cfm; Accessed on 7 May 2012.
- EIA (US Energy Information Administration). 2012. Maine state profile and energy estimates. http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=ME. Accessed 12 April 2013.
- Island Institute. 2012. Economics of Offshore Wind Energy in Maine http://www.islandinstitute.org/documents/Economics_11x17_march21.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2014.
- Kline, P. 1999. The handbook of psychological testing, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Krueger, A.D., G.R. Parsons, and J. Firestone. 2011. Valuing the visual disamenity of offshore wind power projects at varying distances from the shore: An application on the Delaware shoreline. Land Economics 87(2): 268–283.Google Scholar
- Ladenburg, J., and B. Moller. 2011. Attitude and acceptance of offshore wind farms—The influence of travel time and wind farm attributes. United States Association for Energy Economics and the International Association for Energy Economics Working Paper, USAEE-IAEE WP 11-079.Google Scholar
- Marrinan, S.J. 2012. Evaluating the influence of Maine residency on support for energy investments and private behavior: Two economic choice studies. M.S. thesis, The Graduate School, The University of Maine, August.Google Scholar
- Miller, K. 2012. LePage’s wind power stance stirs discomfort. Bangor Daily News 5/28.Google Scholar
- Morison, S.L. 2012. US Department of the Navy, Naval Historical Center, Washington DC http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/nhc/fairwinds.htm . Accessed 3 July 2012.
- MRSA 35-A (Maine Revised Statute Title 35-A). Public utilities heading: PL 1987, C. 141, Pt. A, §6 (new). http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/35-A/title35-A.pdf. Accessed on 7 May 2012.
- NWW (National Wind Watch). 2011. Groups opposed to Kibby wind project to protest LURC meeting January 4, 2011. http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2011/01/04/groups-opposed-to-kibby-wind-project-to-protest-lurc-meeting/. Accessed 9 May 2012.
- Schalit N. 2010. Some who created wind-power fast track now questioning the goals they set. Bangor Daily News (Aug. 09). http://bangordailynews.com/2010/08/09/news/some-who-created-windpower-fast-track-now-questioning-the-goals-they-set/. Accessed 9 May 2012.
- Seelye, K.Q. 2013. A proposal for a propane tank looms large over a Maine coastal town. The New York Times (Feb. 22, 2013). http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/23/us/proposed-propane-tank-cleaves-searsport-me.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Accessed 18 April 2012.
- Smith, H., and L. Lindenfeld. In press. Making media studies engaged: A look at methods, approaches and opportunities for change. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature & Culture. Google Scholar
- Williams, D.R., and J.J. Vaske. 2003. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science 49(6): 830–840.Google Scholar