Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 1403–1414 | Cite as

Effect of Deepwater Horizon Oil on Growth Rates of Juvenile Penaeid Shrimps

  • Lawrence P. Rozas
  • Thomas J. Minello
  • M. Scott Miles
Article

Abstract

Marsh shoreline, an important habitat for juvenile penaeid shrimps, was extensively oiled in coastal Louisiana by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010. The effect of this spill on growth was examined for brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus and white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus held for 7 days in field mesocosms in Barataria Bay during May and August 2011, respectively. The experiments each had 10 treatment combinations, five apparent oil levels, each one with and without added food. Mesocosms were placed in northern Barataria Bay along shorelines that varied in oiling (designated as heavy, moderate, light, very light, or none based on NOAA surveys), and shrimp in half the mesocosms received additional food. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) concentrations determined from sediment cores collected at each mesocosm were significantly higher at heavy and moderate than very light shorelines and also higher at moderate than light and none shorelines. Brown shrimp grew more slowly at heavy than very light or none shorelines, and a statistically significant negative relationship was detected between brown shrimp growth rates and sediment PAH concentrations. In August, PAH sediment concentrations had decreased significantly from the values measured in May, no significant difference in white shrimp growth rates was detected among oiling levels, and no relationship was detected between white shrimp growth and sediment PAH concentrations. Both brown shrimp and white shrimp grew more rapidly in mesocosms where food was added. Our study shows that exposure to nonlethal concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons can reduce growth rates of juvenile penaeid shrimps.

Keywords

Field experiment Growth comparison Farfantepenaeus aztecus Litopenaeus setiferus Food addition 

Supplementary material

12237_2013_9766_MOESM1_ESM.xls (38 kb)
ESM 1(XLS 38 kb)
12237_2013_9766_MOESM2_ESM.xls (39 kb)
ESM 2(XLS 39 kb)
12237_2013_9766_MOESM3_ESM.xls (27 kb)
ESM 3(XLS 27 kb)
12237_2013_9766_MOESM4_ESM.xls (27 kb)
ESM 4(XLS 27 kb)
12237_2013_9766_MOESM5_ESM.xls (30 kb)
ESM 5(XLS 29 kb)
12237_2013_9766_MOESM6_ESM.pptx (59 kb)
ESM 6(PPTX 58 kb)

References

  1. Baker, R., and T.J. Minello. 2010. Growth and mortality of juvenile white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus in a marsh pond. Marine Ecology Progress Series 413: 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltz, D.M., C. Rakocinski, and J.W. Fleeger. 1993. Microhabitat use by marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36: 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beseres, J.J., and R.J. Feller. 2007. Importance of predation by white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus on estuarine subtidal macrobenthos. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 344: 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, D.R. 1958. Planning of experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Crouch, M.D., and S.A. Barker. 1997. Analysis of toxic wastes in tissues from aquatic species: applications of matrix solid-phase dispersion. Journal of Chromatography. A 774: 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Culbertson, J.B., I. Valiela, E.E. Peacock, C.M. Reddy, A. Carter, and R. VanderKruik. 2007. Long-term biological effects of petroleum residues on fiddler crabs in salt marshes. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54: 955–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dall, W., B.J. Hill, P.C. Rothlisberg, and D.J. Staples. 1990. Advances in marine biology. In The biology of the Penaeidae, 27th ed, ed. J.H.S. Blaxter. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, D.A., and C.R. Arnold. 1994. Growth response of Penaeus setiferus to four commercial feeds under controlled laboratory conditions. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 25: 561–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, J.L.D., A.C. Young-Williams, A.H. Hines, and O. Zmora. 2004. Comparing two types of internal tags in juvenile blue crabs. Fisheries Research 67: 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dean Jr., W.E. 1974. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition, comparison with other methods. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 44: 242–248.Google Scholar
  11. Decker, C.J., and J.W. Fleeger. 1984. The effect of crude oil on the colonization of meiofauna into salt marsh sediments. Hydrobiologia 118: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, R.R.C. 1978. Effect of water-soluble oil fractions on metabolism, growth, and carbon budget of the shrimp Crangon crangon. Marine Biology 46: 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fleeger, J.W., and G.T. Chandler. 1983. Meiofauna responses to an experimental oil spill in a Louisiana salt marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 11: 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folk, R.L. 1980. Petrology of sedimentary rocks, 2nd ed. Austin: Hemphill Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fry, B., and L. C. Anderson. 2014. Minimal incorporation of Deepwater Horizon oil by estuarine filter feeders. Marine Pollution Bulletin. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.018.
  16. Fry, B., D.M. Baltz, M.C. Benfield, J.W. Fleeger, A. Gace, H.L. Haas, and Z.J. Quinones-Rivera. 2003. Stable isotope indicators of movement and residency for brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) in coastal Louisiana marshscapes. Estuaries 26: 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao, H., M.S. Miles, B.M. Meyer, R.L. Wong, and E.B. Overton. 2012. Assessment of cyclodextrin-enhanced extraction of crude oil from contaminated porous media. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 14: 2164–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godin, D.M., W.H. Carr, G. Hagino, F. Segura, J.N. Sweeney, and L. Blankenship. 1996. Evaluation of a fluorescent elastomer internal tag in juvenile and adult shrimp Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 139: 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henry, C.B., and E.B. Overton. 1993. Chemical composition and source-fingerprinting of depositional oil from the Kuwait oil fires. In: Proc. 1993 International Oil Spill Conference. American Petroleum Institute, Washington D.C., pp. 407–414.Google Scholar
  20. Hoff, R.Z., G. Shigenaka, and C.B. Henry. 1993. Salt marsh recovery from a crude oil spill, vegetation, oil weathering, and response. In: Proc. 1993 International Oil Spill Conference. American Petroleum Institute, Washington D.C., pp. 307–311.Google Scholar
  21. Kokaly, R.F., B.R. Couvillion, J.M. Holloway, D.A. Roberts, S.L. Ustin, S.H. Peterson, S. Khanna, and S.C. Piazza. 2013. Spectroscopic remote sensing of the distribution and persistence of oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill in Barataria Bay marshes. Remote Sensing of Environment 129: 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, R.F., C. Ryan, and M.L. Neuhauser. 1976. Fate of petroleum hydrocarbons taken up from food and water by the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Marine Biology 37: 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin, Q., and I. Mendelssohn. 2012. Impacts and recovery of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on vegetation structure and function of coastal salt marshes in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Science and Technology 46: 3737–3743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCall, B.D., and S.C. Pennings. 2012. Disturbance and recovery of salt marsh arthropod communities following BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. PLoS One 7(3): e32735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNutt, M.K., R. Camilli, T.J. Crone, G.D. Guthrie, P.A. Hsieh, T.B. Ryerson, O. Savas, and F. Shaffer. 2011. Review of flow rate estimates of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1112139108.
  26. McTigue, T., and R.J. Zimmerman. 1998. The use of infauna by juvenile Penaeus aztecus Ives and Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus). Estuaries 21: 160–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meador, J.P., E. Casillas, C.A. Sloan, and U. Varanasi. 1995. Comparative bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from sediment by two infaunal invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 123: 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mendelssohn, I.A., G.L. Anderson, D.M. Baltz, R. Caffey, K.R. Carman, J.W. Fleeger, S.B. Joye, Q. Lin, E. Maltby, E.B. Overton, and L.P. Rozas. 2012. Oil impacts to coastal wetlands: implications for the Mississippi River Delta ecosystem after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. BioScience 62: 562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miles, M.S., E.B. Overton, and B.M. Meyer. 2011. Characteristics, behavior, and response effectiveness of spilled dielectric insulating oil in the marine environment. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE), Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional Office, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  30. Minello, T.J. 1999. Nekton densities in shallow estuarine habitats of Texas and Louisiana and the identification of essential fish habitat. In: Benaka L. (ed) Fish habitat: essential fish habitat and habitat rehabilitation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 22:43–75Google Scholar
  31. Moles, A., and B.L. Norcross. 1998. Effects of oil-laden sediments on growth and health of juvenile flatfishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 605–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nance, J.M. 1991. Effects of oil/gas field produced water on the macrobenthic community in a small gradient estuary. Hydrobiologia 220: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neff, J.M., and J.W. Anderson. 1981. Response of marine animals to petroleum and specific petroleum hydrocarbons. New York: Halsted Press. a Division of John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  34. Neff, J.M., B.A. Cox, D. Dixit, and J.W. Anderson. 1976. Accumulation and release of petroleum-derived aromatic hydrocarbons by four species of marine animals. Marine Biology 38: 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. NOAA. 2012. Deepwater Horizon Shoreline Cleanup and Assessment Technique (SCAT) shoreline oiling data. Provided in May 2012 by the National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration.Google Scholar
  36. Orlando, S.P. Jr., L.P. Rozas, G.H. Ward, and C.J. Klein. 1993. Salinity characteristics of Gulf of Mexico estuaries. NOAA Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment, Silver Spring, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  37. Overton, E.B, M.S. Miles, B.M. Ashton, and R.L. Wong. 2008. Determination of the net flux of reactive volatile organic compounds at the air-water interface in the Gulf of Mexico. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional Office, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  38. Peterson, C.H., L.L. McDonald, R.H. Green, and W.P. Erickson. 2001. Sampling design begets conclusions: the statistical basis for detection of injury to and recovery of shoreline communities after the ‘Exxon Valdez’ oil spill. Marine Ecology Progress Series 210: 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quinn, G.P., and M.J. Keough. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roth, A.-M.F. 2009. Anthropogenic and natural perturbations on lower Barataria Bay, Louisiana: detecting responses of marsh-edge fishes and decapod crustaceans. Ph.D. dissertation, Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
  41. Roth, A.-M.F., and D.M. Baltz. 2009. Short-term effects of an oil spill on marsh-edge fishes and decapod crustaceans. Estuaries and Coasts 32: 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 2009. Using nekton growth as a metric for assessing habitat restoration by marsh terracing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 394: 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 2010. Nekton density patterns in tidal ponds and adjacent wetlands related to pond size and salinity. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 2011. Variation in penaeid shrimp growth rates along an estuarine salinity gradient: implications for managing river diversions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 397: 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rozas, L.P., T.J. Minello, and C.B. Henry. 2000. An assessment of potential oil spill damage to salt marsh habitats and fisheries resources in Galveston Bay, Texas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40: 1148–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sauer, T.C., J.S. Brown, P.D. Boehm, D.V. Aurand, J. Michel, and M.O. Hayes. 1993. Hydrocarbon source identification and weathering characterization of intertidal and subtidal sediments along the Saudi Arabian coast after the Gulf War oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin 27: 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Southward, A.J. 1982. An ecologist’s view of the implications of the observed physiological and biochemical effects of petroleum compounds on marine organisms and ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 297: 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sreeram, M.P., and N.R. Menon. 2005. Histopathological changes in the hepatopancreas of the penaeid shrimp Metapenaeus dobsoni exposed to petroleum hydrocarbons. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 47: 160–168.Google Scholar
  49. Suchanek, T.H. 1993. Oil impacts on marine invertebrate populations and communities. American Zoologist 33: 510–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tatem, H.E., B.A. Cox, and J.W. Anderson. 1978. The toxicity of oils and petroleum hydrocarbons to estuarine crustaceans. Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science 6: 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Teal, J.M., J.W. Farrington, K.A. Burns, J.J. Stegeman, B.W. Tripp, B. Woodin, and C. Phinney. 1992. The West Falmouth oil spill after 20 years: fate of fuel oil compounds and effects on animals. Marine Pollution Bulletin 24: 607–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. SW-846 Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/3540c.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2014.
  53. Walker, N.D., C.T. Pilley, V.V. Raghunathan, E.J. D’Sa, R.R. Leben, N.G. Hoffmann, P.J. Brickley, P.D. Coholan, N. Sharma, H.C. Graber, and R.E. Turner. 2011. Impacts of loop current frontal cyclonic eddies and wind forcing on the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. In Monitoring and modeling the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: a record-breaking enterprise, ed. Y. Liu, A. MacFadyen, Z.-G. Ji, and R.H. Weisberg. Washington DC: AGU. doi:10.1029/2011GM001120.Google Scholar
  54. Wang, Z., S.A. Stout, and M. Fingas. 2006. Forensic fingerprinting of biomarkers for oil spill characterization and source identification. Environmental Forensics 7: 105–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitehead, A., B. Dubansky, C. Bodinier, T.I. Garcia, S. Miles, C. Pilley, V. Raghunathan, J.L. Roach, N. Walker, R.B. Walter, C.D. Rice, and F. Galvez. 2011. Genomic and physiological footprint of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on resident marsh fishes. PNAS Early Edition (www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1109545108).
  56. Wickham, D.A., and F.C. Minkler. 1975. Laboratory observations on daily patterns of burrowing and locomotor activity of pink shrimp, Penaeus duorarum, brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus, and white shrimp, Penaeus setiferus. Contributions in Marine Science 19: 21–35.Google Scholar
  57. Zimmerman, R.J., T.J. Minello, and G. Zamora Jr. 1984. Selection of vegetated habitat by brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus, in a Galveston Bay salt marsh. Fishery Bulletin 82: 325–336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence P. Rozas
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Minello
    • 2
  • M. Scott Miles
    • 3
  1. 1.Estuarine Habitats and Coastal Fisheries CenterNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service/SEFSCLafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Galveston LaboratoryNOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service/SEFSCGalvestonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental SciencesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations