Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 973–985 | Cite as

Sediment Abiotic Patterns in Current and Newly Created Intertidal Habitats from an Impacted Estuary

  • Olivier BeauchardEmail author
  • Johannes Teuchies
  • Sander Jacobs
  • Eric Struyf
  • Tom Van der Spiet
  • Patrick Meire


The controlled reduced tide system (CRT) is a new technique for restoring tidal marshes and is being tested in the Schelde estuary (Belgium). Biogeochemical processes within a CRT were hypothesized to support and improve several estuarine functions such as sediment trapping and nutrient burial. In 2006, the first pilot CRT was implemented in the freshwater zone of the estuary. Fifteen sediment physicochemical descriptors were intensively monitored over 3 years in the newly created CRT and in reference habitats from the adjacent estuary. Soil transformed rapidly in the CRT; in the most frequently flooded zones, the formation of a nutrient-rich estuarine sedimentary substrate contrasted with the estuarine sand flats where shear stress is sustained by coastal squeeze. The temporal dynamics of the sediment descriptors were investigated to identify key processes involved in the flooding of the CRT sediment. Although many processes were specific to the CRT, both reference and CRT sediment characteristics experienced similar long-term oscillations. However, despite such variations, successful CRT nutrient trapping and fine particles burial were demonstrated. This study proves that the CRT, in accordance with restoration goals, can restore ecological functions in impacted estuaries. In addition, the results highlight the complex timing of abiotic patterns in intertidal sediments.


Tidal marsh Monitoring Sediment characteristics Nutrient dynamics 



This research was funded by graduate research fellowships of Antwerp University. We greatly thank Katrijn Vanrenterghem for field and laboratory contributions, Stefan Van Damme for valuable comments, and Greg Silsbe who improved the quality of the last version of the text. We are also grateful to two anonymous referees for constructive remarks that substantially improved the quality of manuscript. Part of this work was realized in collaboration with the Flemish Government, Environment and Infrastructure Department, W&Z (Sigma plan).

Supplementary material

12237_2013_9743_MOESM1_ESM.doc (27 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 27 kb)
12237_2013_9743_MOESM2_ESM.doc (27 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 27 kb)
12237_2013_9743_MOESM3_ESM.doc (26 kb)
ESM 3 (DOC 26 kb)
12237_2013_9743_MOESM4_ESM.doc (2.1 mb)
ESM 4 (DOC 2146 kb)


  1. Andrews, J.E., D. Burgess, R.R. Cave, E.G. Coombes, T.D. Jickells, D.J. Parkes, and R.K. Turner. 2006. Biogeochemical value of managed realignment, Humber estuary, UK. Science of the Total Environment 371: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, D.S., A.M. Mitchell, and G. Rees. 1997. Chemistry and microbial ecology: processes at the microscale. In Frontiers in Ecology – Building the Links, ed. N. Klomp, and I. Lunt, 171–181. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, A.H., A. Barendregt, and D.F. Whigham. 2009. Tidal freshwater wetlands – an introduction to the ecosystem. In Tidal freshwater wetlands, ed. A. Barendregt, D.F. Whigham, and A.H. Baldwin, 1–10. Leiden: Backhuys Publisher.Google Scholar
  4. Beauchard, O., S. Jacobs, T.J.S. Cox, T. Maris, D. Vrebos, A. Van Braeckel, and P. Meire. 2011. A new technique for tidal habitat restoration: evaluation of its hydrological potentials. Ecological Engineering 37: 1849–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauchard, O., S. Jacobs, T. Ysebaert, and P. Meire. 2013a. Macroinvertebrate community functioning in impacted and newly-created tidal freshwater habitats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 120: 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beauchard, O., S. Jacobs, T. Ysebaert, and P. Meire. 2013b. Avian response to tidal freshwater habitat creation by controlled reduced tide system. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 131: 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billen, G., G.C. Lancelot, and M. Meybeck. 1991. N, P, and Si retention along the aquatic continuum from land to ocean. In Ocean margin processes in global change, ed. F.C.A. Mantoura, J.M. Martin, and R. Wollast, 19–44. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Blackwell, M.S.A., D.V. Hogan, and E. Maltby. 2004. The short-term impact of managed realignment on soil environmental variables and hydrology. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 59: 889–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bock, M.J., and D.C. Miller. 1995. Storm effects on particulate food resources on an intertidal sand flat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 187: 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowden, W.B., C.J. Vorosmarty, J.T. Morris, B.J. Peterson, J.E. Hobbie, P.A. Steudler, and B. Moore. 1991. Transport and processing of nitrogen in a tidal freshwater wetland. Water Resources Research 27: 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cahoon, D.R., D.J. Reed, and J.W. Day. 1995. Estimating shallow subsidence in microtidal salt marshes of the southeastern United States: Kaye and Barghoorn revisited. Marine Geology 128: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chessel, D., A.B. Dufour, and J. Thioulouse. 2004. The ade4 package-I - one-table methods. Report Newsmagazine 4: 5–10.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, T.J.S., T. Maris, P. De Vleeschauwer, T. De Mulder, K. Soetaert, and P. Meire. 2006. Flood control areas as an opportunity to restore estuarine habitat. Ecological Engineering 28: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dale, N.G. 1974. Bacteria in intertidal sediments: factors related to their distribution. Limnology and Oceanography 19: 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, M., D. Burdon, K.L. Hemingway, and S.E. Apitz. 2007. Estuarine, coastal and marine ecosystem restoration: confusing management and science – a revision of concepts. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 74: 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Findlay, S., K. Howe, and H.K. Austin. 1990. Comparison of detritus dynamics in two tidal freshwater wetlands. Ecology 71: 288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forstner, U., W. Calmano, and J. Schoer. 1982. Metals in sediments from the Elbe, Weser and Ems estuaries and from the German Bight: grain size effects and chemical forms. Thalassia Jugoslavica 12: 30–38.Google Scholar
  18. French, P.W. 2006. Managed realignment – the developing story of a comparatively new approach to soft engineering. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 59: 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gribsholt, B., H.T.S. Boschker, E. Struyf, M. Andersson, A. Tramper, L. De Brabandere, S. Van Damme, N. Brion, P. Meire, F. Dehairs, J.J. Middelburg, and C. Heip. 2005. Nitrogen processing in a tidal freshwater marsh: a whole ecosystem 15N labeling study. Limnology and Oceanography 50: 1945–1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gribsholt, B., E. Struyf, A. Tramper, M.G.I. Andersson, N. Brion, L. De Brabandere, S. Van Damme, P. Meire, J.J. Middelburg, F. Dehairs, and H.T.S. Boschker. 2006. Ammonium transformation in a nitrogen-rich tidal freshwater marsh. Biogeochemistry 80: 289–298.Google Scholar
  21. Hartzell, J.L., T.E. Jorda, and J.C. Cornwell. 2010. Phosphorus burial in sediments along the salinity gradient of the Patuxent river, a subestuary of the Chesapeake bay (USA). Estuaries and Coasts 33: 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heip, C.H.R., N.K. Goosen, P.M.J. Herman, J. Kromkamp, J.J. Middelburg, and K. Soetaert. 1995. Production and consumption of biological particles in temperate tidal estuaries. Oceanography and Marine Biology 33: 1–149.Google Scholar
  23. Houba, R., J.J. van der Lee, I. Novozamsky, and I. Wallinga. 1989. Soil and plant analysis, a series of syllabi. Part 5. Soil analysis procedures. Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  24. Jacobs, S., E. Struyf, T. Maris, and P. Meire. 2008. Spatiotemporal aspects of silica buffering in restored tidal marshes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 80: 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs, S., O. Beauchard, E. Struyf, T.J.S. Cox, T. Maris, and P. Meire. 2009. Restoration of tidal freshwater vegetation using controlled reduced tide (CRT) along the Schelde estuary (Belgium). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 85: 368–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jickells, T.D. 1998. Nutrient biogeochemistry of the coastal zone. Science 281: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kadiri, M., K.L. Spencer, C.M. Heppell, and P. Fletcher. 2011. Sediment characteristics of a restored saltmarsh and mudflat in a managed realignment scheme in Southeast England. Hydrobiologia 672: 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Livingston, R.J., X. Niu, F.G. Lewis III, and G.C. Woodsum. 1997. Freshwater input to a Gulf estuary: long-term control of trophic organization. Ecological Applications 7: 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Long, E.R. 2000. Degraded sediment quality in U.S. estuaries: a review of magnitude and ecological implications. Ecological Applications 10: 338–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maris, T., T.J.S. Cox, S. Temmerman, P. De Vleeschauwer, S. Van Damme, T. De Mulder, E. Van den Bergh, and P. Meire. 2007. Tuning the tide: creating ecological conditions for tidal marsh development in a flood control area. Hydrobiologia 588: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McLusky, D.S., and M. Elliott. 2004. The estuarine ecosystem: ecology, threats and management. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Megonigal, J.P., and S.C. Neubauer. 2009. Biogeochemistry of tidal freshwater wetlands. In Coastal Wetlands: An Integrated Ecosystem Approach, ed. G.M.E. Perillo, E. Wolanski, D.R. Cahoon, M.M. Brinson, 535–563. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  33. Meire, P., and M. Vincx (ed.), 1993: Marine and estuarine gradients. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 27:71–496Google Scholar
  34. Meire, P., T. Ysebaert, S. Van Damme, E. Van den Bergh, T. Maris, and E. Struyf. 2005. The Scheldt estuary: a description of a changing ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 540: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Middelburg, J.J., and P.M.J. Herman. 2007. Organic matter processing in tidal estuaries. Marine Chemistry 106: 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Middelburg, J.J., G. Klaver, J. Nieuwenhuize, and T. Vlug. 1995. Carbon and nitrogen cycling in intertidal sediments near Doel, Scheldt estuary. Hydrobiologia 311: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris, A.W., R.F.C. Mantoura, A.J. Bale, and R.J.M. Howland. 1978. Very low salinity regions of estuaries: important sites for chemical and biological reactions. Nature 274: 678–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Munzel, U., and L.A. Hothorn. 2001. A unified approach to simultaneous rank test procedures in the unbalanced one-way layout. Biometrical Journal 43: 553–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neubauer, S.C. 2008. Contributions of mineral and organic components to tidal freshwater marsh accretion. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 78: 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nowicki, B.L., and C.A. Oviatt. 1990. Are estuaries traps for anthropogenic nutrients? Evidence from estuarine mesocosms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 66: 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Odum, W.E. 1988. Ecology of tidal freshwater and salt marshes. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 147–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Plancke, Y., S. Ides, and F. Mostaert. 2010. Monitoring and historical analysis of mudflats and marshes along the sea Schelde. Float measurements in Ballooi and Notelaer, June 2009. Flanders Hydraulics Research, Report 713_21, Antwerp, Belgium, 33 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
  44. Rooth, J.E., J.C. Stevenson, and J.C. Cornwell. 2003. Increased sediment accretion rates following invasion by Phragmites australis: the role of liter. Estuaries 26: 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevens, C.J., P. Manning, L.J.L. van den Berg, M.C.C. de Graaf, G.W.W. Wamelink, A.W. Boxman, A. Bleeker, P. Vergeer, M. Arroniz-Crespo, J. Limpens, L.P.M. Lamers, R. Bobbink, and E. Dorland. 2011. Ecosystem responses to reduced and oxidised nitrogen inputs in European terrestrial habitats. Environmental Pollution 159: 665–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Struyf, E., S. Temmerman, and P. Meire. 2007. Dynamics of biogenic Si in freshwater tidal marshes: Si regeneration and retention in marsh sediments (Scheldt estuary). Biogeochemistry 82: 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Temmerman, S., G. Govers, P. Meire, and S. Wartel. 2003. Modelling long-term tidal marsh growth under changing tidal conditions and suspended sediment concentrations, Scheldt estuary, Belgium. Marine Geophysical Researches 193: 151–169.Google Scholar
  48. Teuchies, J., O. Beauchard, S. Jacobs, and P. Meire. 2012. Evolution of estuarine soil metal concentrations: results from a new tidal marsh restoration technique. Science of the Total Environment 419: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Damme, S., E. Struyf, T. Maris, T. Ysebaert, F. Dehairs, M. Tackx, C. Heip, and P. Meire. 2005. Spatial and temporal patterns of water quality along the estuarine salinity gradient of the Scheldt estuary (Belgium and The Netherlands): results of an integrated monitoring approach. Hydrobiologia 540: 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van den Bergh, E., S. Van Damme, J. Graveland, D. de Jong, I. Baten, and P. Meire. 2005. Ecological rehabilitation of the Schelde estuary (The Netherlands–Belgium; Northwest Europe): linking ecology, safety against floods, and accessibility for port development. Restoration Ecology 13: 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Spaendonk, J.C.M., J.C. Kromkamp, and P.R.M. De Visscher. 1993. Primary production of phytoplankton in a turbid coastal plain estuary, the Westerschelde (The Nertherlands). Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 31: 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vandenbruwaene, W., T. Maris, T.J.S. Cox, D.R. Cahoon, P. Meire, and S. Temmerman. 2011. Sedimentation and response to sea-level rise of a restored marsh with reduced tidal exchange: comparison with a natural tidal marsh. Geomorphology 130: 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vitousek, P.M., J.D. Aber, R.W. Howarth, G.E. Likens, P.A. Matson, D.W. Schindler, W.H. Schlesinger, and D.G. Tilman. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7: 737–750.Google Scholar
  54. Zedler, J.B. 2004. Compensating for wetland losses in the United States. Ibis 146: 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Beauchard
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Johannes Teuchies
    • 1
  • Sander Jacobs
    • 1
    • 3
  • Eric Struyf
    • 1
  • Tom Van der Spiet
    • 1
  • Patrick Meire
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Antwerp, Ecosystem Management Research GroupWilrijkBelgium
  2. 2.Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ)YersekeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute of Nature and Forest ResearchBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations