An Evaluation of Temporal Changes in Sediment Accumulation and Impacts on Carbon Burial in Mobile Bay, Alabama, USA
- 625 Downloads
The estuarine environment can serve as either a source or sink of carbon relative to the coastal ocean carbon budget. A variety of time-dependent processes such as sedimentation, carbon supply, and productivity dictate how estuarine systems operate, and Mobile Bay is a system that has experienced both natural and anthropogenic perturbations that influenced depositional processes and carbon cycling. Sediments from eight box cores provide a record of change in bulk sediment accumulation and carbon burial over the past 110 years. Accumulation rates in the central part of the basin (0.09 g cm−2) were 60–80 % less than those observed at the head (0.361 g cm−2) and mouth (0.564 g cm−2) of the bay. Sediment accumulation in the central bay decreased during the past 90 years in response to both anthropogenic (causeway construction) and natural (tropical cyclones) perturbations. Sediment accumulation inevitably increased the residence time of organic carbon in the oxic zone, as observed in modeled remineralization rates, and reduced the overall carbon burial. Such observations highlight the critical balance among sediment accumulation, carbon remineralization, and carbon burial in dynamic coastal environments. Time-series analysis based solely on short-term observation would not capture the long-term effects of changes in sedimentation on carbon cycling. Identifying these relationships over longer timescales (multi-annual to decadal) will provide a far better evaluation of coastal ocean carbon budgets.
KeywordsCarbon remineralization Sediment accumulation Anthropogenic modifications Natural disturbances 2-G model Lead-210
The US Geological Survey Coastal and Marine Geology Program provided funding for this research as part of the Northern Gulf of Mexico Ecosystem Change and Hazard Susceptibility Project. The authors would like to thank Caitlin Reynolds, Christopher Reich, Adis Muslic, Dan Umberger, Marci Marot, Scott Adams, and Kathryn Richwine of the USGS for their continued support in the lab and in the field. The manuscript benefited from as discussions with and suggestions made by Thomas J. Smith of the USGS and two anonymous reviewers. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US government.
- Appleby, P.G. 2001. Chronostratigraphic techniques in recent sediments. In Tracking Environmental Change using Lake Sediments, eds. W.M. Last and J.P. Smol. 171–203. Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Austin, G.B. 1954. On the circulation and tidal flushing of Mobile Bay, Alabama. College Station: Department of Geography, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
- Berner, R.A. 1980. Early diagenesis: A theoretical approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Breithaupt, J.L., J.M. Smoak, T.J. Smith, C.J. Sanders, and A. Hoare. 2012. Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: Strengthening the global budget. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 26.Google Scholar
- Burdige, D.J. 2006. Geochemistry of marine sediments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Curtis, W.F., J.J. Culbertson and E.B. Chase, 1973. Fluvial-sediment discharge to the oceans from the conterminous United States. US Geological Survey, U.S.G.S. Circular 670, p. 17.Google Scholar
- Cutshall, N.H., and I.L. Larsen. 1986. Calibration of a portable intrinsic ge gamma-ray detector using point sources and testing for field applications. Health Physics 51: 53–59.Google Scholar
- Danielson, J.J., J.C. Brock, D.M. Howard, D.B. Gesch, J.M. Bonisteel-Cormier, L.J. Travers. 2013. Topobathymetric model of Mobile Bay, Alabama. US Geological Survey, U.S.G.S Data Series 769. http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/769/
- Doyle, L.J., and T.N. Sparks. 1980. Sediments of the Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida (MAFLA) continental shelf. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 50: 905–916.Google Scholar
- Fearn, M.L. 2004. Changes in water conditions and sedimentation rates associated with construction of the Mobile Bay Causeway. In Geology and Hydrology of the Alabama Gulf Coast, ed. D. Haywick. http://archives.datapages.com/data/alabama/58/25.pdf.
- Ha, H.K., and K. Park. 2012. High-resolution comparison of sediment dynamics under different forcing conditions in the bottom boundary layer of a shallow, micro-tidal estuary. Geophysical Research Letters 117, C06020.Google Scholar
- Isphording, W.C. and G.M. Lamb. 1979. The sediments of Mobile Bay. Dauphin Island Sea Lab Report 80-002. 24 p.Google Scholar
- Isphording, W.C. and F.D. Imsand, 1991. Cyclonic events and sedimentation in the Gulf of Mexico. Coastal Sediments 1991, Seattle, pp. 1122–1136Google Scholar
- Isphording, W.C., F.D. Imsand, and R.B. Jackson. 1996. Fluvial sediment characteristics of the Mobile River Delta. Transactions Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 46: 185–191.Google Scholar
- Kendall, C., D.H. Doctor, D.H. Heinrich, and K.T. Karl. 2003. Stable isotope applications in hydrologic studies. Treatise on geochemistry, 319–364. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Kindinger, J.L., P.S. Balson and J.G. Flocks. 1994. Stratigraphy of the Mississippi–Alabama shelf and the Mobile River incised-valley system. In Incised-valley systems: Origin and sedimentary sequences, eds. R.W. Dalrymple, R. Boyd and B.A. Zaitlain, 83–95. Tulsa: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology).Google Scholar
- Marot, M.E. and C.G. Smith. 2012. Radioisotopic data of sediment collected in Mobile and Bon Secour Bays, Alabama. US Geological Survey, USGS Open-File Report 2012-1172, 15 p.Google Scholar
- Mars, J.C., A.W. Shultz, and W.W. Schroeder. 1992. Stratigraphy and Holocene evolution of Mobile Bay in southwestern Alabama. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 42: 529–542.Google Scholar
- May, E.B. 1976. Holocene sediments of Mobile Bay, Alabama. Alabama Marine Resources Bulletin No. 11. pp. 1–25. Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
- Mobile Bay National Estuary Program (MBNEP). 2006. Implementation Reviews, Mobile Bay National Estuary Program, http://www.mobilebaynep.com/images/uploads/library/03-05_Implementationfinal.pdf.
- Regnier, P., P. Friedlingstein, P. Ciais, F.T. Mackenzie, N. Gruber, I.A. Janssens, G.G. Laruelle, R. Lauerwald, S. Luyssaert, A.J. Andersson, S. Arndt, C. Arnosti, A.V. Borges, A.W. Dale, A. Gallego-Sala, Y. Godderis, N. Goossens, J. Hartmann, C. Heinze, T. Ilyina, F. Joos, D.E. LaRowe, J. Leifeld, F.J.R. Meysman, G. Munhoven, P.A. Raymond, R. Spahni, P. Suntharalingam, and M. Thullner. 2013. Anthropogenic perturbation of the carbon fluxes from land to ocean. Nature Geoscience 6: 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rice, D.L., and R.B. Hanson. 1984. A kinetic model for detritus nitrogen: Role of the associated bacteria in nitrogen accumulation. Bulletin of Marine Science 35: 326–340.Google Scholar
- Richwine, K.A. and L.E. Osterman. 2012. Benthic foraminiferal census data from Mobile Bay, Alabama—Counts of surface samples and box cores. US Geological Survey, USGS Data Series 704. http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/704/.
- Rodriguez, A.B.., D.L. Greene, J.B. Anderson, and A.R. Simms. 2008. Response of Mobile Bay and eastern Mississippi Sound, Alabama, to changes in sediment accommodation and accumulation. Geological Society of America Special Papers 443: 13–29.Google Scholar
- Velardo, B.M., and S.J. Bentley. 2003. Impacts of tropical systems on the sedimentary fabric of the Mississippi Sound. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions 53: 815–823.Google Scholar