Understanding and Informing Permitting Decisions for Tidal Energy Development Using an Adaptive Management Framework
- 368 Downloads
Marine hydrokinetic (MHK) energy offers a promising new source of renewable ocean energy. However, the young industry is faced with significant challenges. Most notable is the challenge of regulatory uncertainty that is thought to hamper the successful deployment of new tidal energy technologies. Adaptive management may be one approach to deal with uncertainty and inform permitting decisions for hydrokinetic projects. In this study, we apply the concept of adaptive management to the Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project in Maine to better understand and inform permitting decisions. Using a social science approach of observation, interviews, and document analysis, we examine (1) agency roles and authority, (2) agency interactions, (3) regulatory change, and (4) challenges faced in the regulatory and permitting process for MHK development at the federal and state level. We found four institutional factors favorable to an adaptive approach. These include experimentation and learning, institutionalized choice to correct avoidable error, a strong commitment to interagency coordination, and an emphasis on early proactive engagement with project developers. We also identified institutional challenges or vulnerabilities. These include conflicting agency cultures, high financial costs, and long timeframes associated with baseline data collection. Lessons learned from this study can assist regulators, policymakers, and project developers design and implement an actively adaptive management approach that can move new renewable ocean energy development forward in a way that is socially acceptable and environmentally responsible.
KeywordsTidal power Marine hydrokinetic technology Adaptive management Regulatory Uncertainty Permitting decisions Renewable ocean energy
- Anderson, F., G. Achterman, S. Padula, and M. Harte. 2007. A programmatic approach to wave energy planning: Opportunities for the Oregon Wave Energy Trust. Proceedings of Coastal Zone 07 Portland Oregon (July 22–26, 2007).Google Scholar
- Bedard, R., M. Previsic, G. Hagerman, B. Polagye, W. Musial, J. Klure, A. von Jouanne, U. Mathur, C. Collar, C. Hopper, and S. Amsden. 2007. North American ocean energy status- March 2007. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Tidal Power (TP); Volume 8, 2007.Google Scholar
- Bornholdt, M. 2012. Ocean renewable energy from a national perspective. Danvers, MA: Energy Ocean Conference 2012. June 19–21, 2012.Google Scholar
- Cada, G.F., A.E. Copping, and J. Roberts. 2012. Ocean/tidal/stream power: Identifying how marine and hydrokinetic devices affect aquatic environments. Hyrdoworld.com [Accessed June 10, 2012].Google Scholar
- Campbell, H.V. 2009/2010. A rising tide: Wave energy in the United States and Scotland. Sea Grant Law and Policy Journal 2(2): 29–48.Google Scholar
- EPRI. 2005. Ocean tidal and wave energy, renewable energy technical assessment guide—TAG-RE (2005). Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute. 2005. 1010489.Google Scholar
- FERC. 2008. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licensing Hydrokinetic Pilot Projects http://www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/geninfo/licensing/hydrokinetics/pdf/white_paper.pdf (issued April 14, 2008.
- FERC. 2012. Ocean Renewable Power Company: Order issuing pilot project license Minor Project), Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project Project No. 12711–005 (February 27, 2012).Google Scholar
- Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Griset, T.J. 2010. Harnessing the ocean's power: opportunities in renewable ocean energy resources. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 16(2): 151–190.Google Scholar
- Gunderson, L. 1999. Resilience, flexibility, adaptive management – antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology 3(1): 7. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iis1/art7.
- Holling, C.S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. London, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Johnson, B.L. 1999. Introduction to the special feature: Adaptive management – scientifically sound, socially challenged? Conservation Ecology 3(1): 10. [online] URL: http://www.conecol.org/vol3/iis1/art10/.
- Lee, K.N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S.B. 2009. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ocean Energy Task Force (OETF). 2009. Final report of the Ocean Energy Task Force to Governor John E. Baldacci. Augusta, Maine. www.maine.gov/spo/specialprojects/OETF/Documents/finalreport_123109.pdf [Accessed May 24, 2012].
- Strauss, A.C., and J.M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- United States Federal Regulatory Commission and State of Maine. 2009 Memorandum of Understanding (August 2009), http://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/mou/mou-ma.pdf.
- Viehman, H., G.B. Zydlewski. 2012b. Fish interactions with a commercial-scale tidal energy device in the natural environment. Estuaries and Coasts. (THIS ISSUE).Google Scholar
- Viehman, H., G.B. Zydlewski, J.D. McCleave, G. Staines. 2012a. Using acoustics to understand fish presence and vertical distribution in a tidally dynamic region targeted for energy extraction. Estuaries and Coasts. (THIS ISSUE).Google Scholar
- Walters, C.J. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Wellinghoff, J., J. Pederson, and D.L. Morenoff. 2008. Facilitating hydrokinetic energy development through regulatory innovation. Energy Law Journal 29: 397–42.Google Scholar