Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 1–23 | Cite as

Declining Sediments and Rising Seas: an Unfortunate Convergence for Tidal Wetlands

  • Nathaniel B. WestonEmail author
Article

Abstract

The availability of suspended sediments will be a dominant factor influencing the stability of tidal wetlands as sea levels rise. Watershed-derived sediments are a critical source of material supporting accretion in many tidal wetlands, and recent declines in wetland extent in several large river delta systems have been attributed in part to declines in sediment delivery. Little attention has been given, however, to changes in sediment supply outside of large river deltas. In this study, significant declines in suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs) over time were observed for 25 of 61 rivers examined that drain to the East and Gulf Coasts of the USA. Declines in fluvial SSC were significantly correlated with increasing water retention behind dams, indicating that human activities play a role in declining sediment delivery. There was a regional pattern to changes in fluvial sediment, and declines in SSCs were also significantly related to rates of relative sea level rise (RSLR) along the coast, such that wetlands experiencing greater RSLR also tend to be receiving less fluvial sediment. Tidal wetlands in the Mid-Atlantic, Mississippi River Delta, and Texas Gulf especially may become increasingly vulnerable due to rapid RSLR and reductions in sediment. These results also indicate that past rates of marsh accretion may not be indicative of potential future accretion due to changes in sediment availability. Declining watershed sediment delivery to the coastal zone will limit the ability of tidal marshes to keep pace with rising sea levels in some coastal systems.

Keywords

Suspended sediment Tidal wetlands Dams Land use change Accretion Sea level rise 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Guillaume Turcotte for his assistance with GIS analysis, Craig Diziki for assistance with data analysis, and Steven Goldsmith, Simon Mudd, and Mark Stacey for constructive comments on the manuscript. I am grateful to the United States Geological Survey, the Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level, the Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. Agricultural Census, the National Atlas, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture for collection and dissemination of data that makes studies of this nature possible (no endorsement of the data or conclusions is implied). This research was partially supported by National Science Foundation grant DEB-0919173 and by Villanova University.

Supplementary material

12237_2013_9654_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (148 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 147 KB)

References

  1. Barbier, Edward B., Sally D. Hacker, Chris Kennedy, Evamaria W. Koch, Adrian D. Stier, and Brian R. Silliman. 2012. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs 81: 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum, Michael D., and Harry H. Roberts. 2009. Drowning of the Mississippi Delta due to insufficient sediment supply and global sea-level rise. Nature Geoscience 2: 488–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cahoon, Donald R., Philippe F. Hensel, Tom Spencer, Denise J. Reed, Karen L. McKee and Neil Saintilan. 2006. Coastal wetland vulnerability to relative sea-level rise: Wetland elevation trends and process controls. In Wetlands and Natural Resource Management: Ecological Studies, Vol. 190, ed. J.T.A. Verhoeven, B. Beltman, R. Bobbink and D.F. Whigham, 271-292. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Church, John A., and Neil J. White. 2006. A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise. Geophysical Research Letters 33, L01602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Alpaos, Andrea. 2011. The mutual influence of biotic and abiotic components of the long-term ecomorphodynamic evolution of salt-marsh ecosystems. Geomorphology 126: 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Alpaos, A., S.M. Mudd, and L. Carniello. 2011. Dynamic response of marshes to perturbations in suspended sediment concentrations and rates of relative sea level rise. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, F04020.Google Scholar
  7. Day, John W., Robert R. Christian, Donald M. Boesch, Alejandro Yáñez-Arancibia, James Morris, Robert R. Twilley, Larissa Naylor, Linda Schaffner, and Court Stevenson. 2008. Consequences of climate change on the ecogeomorphology of coastal wetlands. Estuaries and Coasts 31: 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day, John W., G. Paul Kemp, Denise J. Reed, Donald R. Cahoon, Roelof M. Boumans, Joseph M. Suhayda, and Robert Gambrell. 2011. Vegetation death and rapid loss of surface elevation in two contrasting Mississippi delta salt marshes: The role of sedimentation, autocompaction and sea-level rise. Ecological Engineering 37: 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dearing, John A., and Richard T. Jones. 2003. Coupling temporal and spatial dimensions of global sediment flux through lake and marine sediment records. Global and Planetary Change 39: 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deegan, Linda A., David Samuel Johnson, R. Scott Warren, Bruce J. Peterson, John W. Fleeger, Sergio Fagherazzi, and Wilfred M. Wollheim. 2012. Coastal euthrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature 490: 388–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeLaune, R.D., James H. Whitcomb, W.H. Patrick Jr., John H. Pardue, and S.R. Pezeshki. 1989. Accretion and canal impacts in a rapidly subsiding wetland. I. 137Cs and 210Pb techniques. Estuaries 12: 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Englehart, Simon E., Benjamin P. Horton, Bruce C. Douglas, W. Richard Peltier, and Torbjörn E. Törnqvist. 2009. Spatial variability of late Holocene and 20th century sea-level rise along the Atlantic coast of the United States. Geology 37: 1115–1118. doi: 10.1130/G30360A.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fagherazzi, Sergio, Matthew L. Kirwan, Simon M. Mudd, Glenn R. Guntenspergen, Stijn Temmerman, Andrea D’Alpaos, Johan van de Koppel, John M. Rybczyk, Enrique Reyes, Chris Craft, and Jonathan Clough. 2012. Numerical models of salt marsh evolution: Ecological, geomorphic, and climatic factors. Reviews of Geophysics. doi: 10.1029/2011RG000359.Google Scholar
  14. Gesch, Dean B. 2007. The National Elevation Dataset. In Digital elevation model technologies and applications: The DEM users manual, 2nd ed, ed. David Maune, 99–118. Bethesda: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.Google Scholar
  15. Gesch, Dean, Michael Oimoen, Susan Greenlee, Charles Nelson, Michael Steuck, and Dean Tyler. 2002. The national elevation dataset. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68: 5–11.Google Scholar
  16. Gleason, Mark L., Deborah A. Elmer, Natalie C. Pien, and John S. Fisher. 1979. Effects of stem density upon sediment retention by salt marsh cord grass, Spartina alterniflora loisel. Estuaries 2: 271–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guillen, J., and A. Palanques. 1997. A historical perspective of the morphological evolution in the lower Ebro River. Environmental Geology 30: 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Homer, Collin, Jon Dewitz, Joyce Fry, Michael Coan, Nazmul Hossain, Charles Larson, Nate Herold, J. Alexa McKerrow, Nick VanDriel, and James Wickham. 2007. Completion of the 2001 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 73: 337–341.Google Scholar
  19. Howarth, Robert W., Jean R. Fruci, and Diane Sherman. 1991. Inputs of sediment and carbon to an estuarine ecosystem: Influence of land use. Ecological Applications 1: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jaffe, Bruce E., Richard E. Smith, and Amy C. Foxgrover. 2007. Anthropogenic influence on sedimentation and intertidal mudflat change in San Pablo Bay, California: 1856–1983. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 73: 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirwan, Matthew L., and A. Brad Murray. 2007. A coupled geomorphic and ecological model of tidal marsh evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 6118–6122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirwan, Matthew L., Glenn R. Guntenspergen, Andrea D’Alpaos, James T. Morris, Simon M. Mudd, and Stijn Temmerman. 2010. Limits on the adaptability of coastal marshes to rising sea level. Geophysical Research Letters 37, L23401. doi: 10.1029/2010GL045489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirwan, Matthew L., A. Brad Murray, Jeffrey P. Donnelly, and D. Reide Corbett. 2011. Rapid wetland expansion during European settlement and its implication for marsh survival under modern sediment delivery rates. Geology 39: 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolker, Alexander S., Mead A. Allison, and Sultan Hameed. 2011. An evaluation of subsidence rates and sea-level variability in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Geophysical Research Letters 38, L21404. doi: 10.1029/2011GL049458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krone, R.B. 1985. Simulation of marsh growth under rising sea levels. In In Hydraulics and hydrology in the small computer age, ed. W.R. Waldrop, 106–115. Reston: Hydraulics Division, ASCE.Google Scholar
  26. Morris, James T., P.V. Sundareshwar, Christopher T. Nietch, Björn Kjerfve, and D.R. Cahoon. 2002. Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83: 2869–2877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morton, Robert A., Julie C. Bernier, and John A. Barras. 2006. Evidence of regional subsidence and associated interior wetland loss induced by hydrocarbon production, Gulf Coast region, USA. Environmental Geology 50: 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mudd, Simon M. 2011. The life and death of salt marshes in response to anthropogenic disturbance of sediment supply. Geology 39: 511–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mudd, Simon M., Susan M. Howell, and James T. Morris. 2009. Impact of dynamic feedbacks between sedimentation, sea-level rise, and biomass production on near-surface marsh stratigraphy and carbon accumulation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 82: 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Atlas. 2009. Major dams of the United States. http://www.nationalatlas.gov/mld/dams00x.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2009.
  31. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. U.S. General Soil Map (STATSGO2). http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed 1 Dec 2009.
  32. Neubauer, Scott C. 2008. Contributions of mineral and organic components to tidal freshwater marsh accretion. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 78: 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nyman, John A., Russel J. Walters, Ronald D. Delaune, and William H. Patrick Jr. 2006. Marsh vertical accretion via vegetative growth. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 69: 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pelletier, Jon D. 2012. A spatially distributed model for the long-term suspended sediment discharge and delivery ratio of drainage basins. Journal of Geophysical Research 117, F02025. doi: 10.1029/2011JF002129.Google Scholar
  35. Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL). Tide Gauge Data. http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/. Accessed 11 Jan 2012.
  36. Pethick, J.S. 1981. Long-term accretion rates on tidal marshes. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 51: 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ravens, Thomas M., Robert C. Thomas, Kimberly A. Roberts, and Peter H. Santchi. 2009. Causes of salt marsh erosion in Galveston Bay, Texas. Journal of Coastal Research 25: 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reed, Denise J. 1995. The response of coastal marshes to sea-level rise: Survival or submergence. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 20: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saenger, Casey, Thomas M. Cronin, Debra Willard, Jeffrey Halka, and Randy Kerhin. 2008. Increased terrestrial to ocean sediment and carbon fluxes in the Northern Chesapeake Bay associated with twentieth century land alteration. Estuaries and Coasts 31: 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schoellhamer, David H. 2011. Sudden clearing of estuarine waters upon crossing the threshold from transport to supply regulation of sediment transport as an erodible sediment pool is depleted: San Francisco Bay, 1999. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 885–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwarz, G.E. 2008. A preliminary SPARROW model of suspended sediment for the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1205.Google Scholar
  42. Syvitski, James P.M., and John D. Milliman. 2007. Geology, geography, and humans battle for dominance over the delivery of fluvial sediment to the coastal ocean. Journal of Geology 115: 1–19.Google Scholar
  43. Syvitski, James P.M., Charles J. Vörösmarty, Albert J. Kettner, and Pamela Green. 2005. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 308: 376–380.Google Scholar
  44. Syvitski, James P.M., Albert J. Kettner, Irina Overeem, Eric W.H. Hutton, Mark T. Hannon, G. Robert Brakenridge, John Day, Charles Vörösmarty, Yoshiki Saito, Liviu Giosan, and Robert J. Nicholls. 2009. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nature Geoscience 2: 681–686.Google Scholar
  45. Törnqvist, Torbjörn E., Davin J. Wallace, Joep E.A. Storm, Jakob Wallinga, Remke L. Van Dam, Martijn Blaauw, Mayke S. Derksen, Cornelis J.W. Klerks, Camiel Meijneken, and Els M.A. Snijders. 2008. Mississippi Delta subsidence primarily caused by compaction of Holocene strata. Nature Geoscience 1: 173–176.Google Scholar
  46. Turner, R.E., E.M. Swenson, and C.S. Milan. 2000. Organic and inorganic contributions to vertical accretion in salt marsh sediments. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. Michael P. Weinstein and Daniel A. Kreeger, 583–595. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Tweel, Andrew W., and R. Eugene Turner. 2012. Watershed land use and river engineering drive wetland formation and loss in the Mississippi River birdfoot delta. Limnology and Oceanography 57: 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1952. United States Census of Agriculture: 1950. Washington: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  49. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1964. U.S. Census of Population: 1960. Washington: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  50. U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  51. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. 1997 Census of Agriculture. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  52. Vermeer, Martin, and Stefan Rahmstorf. 2009. Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 21527–21523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vörösmarty, Charles J., Michael Meybeck, Balázs Fekete, Keshav Sharma, Pamela Green, and James M. Syvitski. 2003. Anthropogenic sediment retention: Major global impact from registered river impoundments. Global and Planetary Change 39: 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wahl, Kenneth. L. and Tony L. Wahl. 1988. Effects of regional ground-water declines on streamflows in the Oklahoma Panhandle. Symposium on Water-Use Data for Water Resources Management, American Water Resources Association, Tucson, Arizona, pp. 239–249.Google Scholar
  55. Walling, D.E. 1999. Linking land use, erosion and sediment yields in river basins. Hydrobiologia 410: 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walling, D.E. 2006. Human impact on land-ocean sediment transfer by the world’s rivers. Geomorphology 79: 192–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Woodworth, P.L., and R. Player. 2003. The Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level: An update to the 21st century. Journal of Coastal Research 19: 287–295.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and the EnvironmentVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations