Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 775–794 | Cite as

Historical Comparison of Fish Community Structure in Lower Chesapeake Bay Seagrass Habitats

  • Kathryn L. SobocinskiEmail author
  • Robert J. Orth
  • Mary C. Fabrizio
  • Robert J. Latour
Article

Abstract

Seagrass beds provide important habitat for fishes and invertebrates in many regions around the world. Accordingly, changes in seagrass coverage may affect fish communities and/or populations, given that many species utilize these habitats during vulnerable early life history stages. In lower Chesapeake Bay, seagrass distribution has contracted appreciably over recent decades due to decreased water clarity and increased water temperature; however, effects of changing vegetated habitat on fish community structure have not been well documented. We compared fish community composition data collected at similar seagrass sites from 1976–1977 and 2009–2011 to investigate potential changes in species richness, community composition, and relative abundance within these habitats. While seagrass coverage at the specific study sites did not vary considerably between time periods, contemporary species richness was lower and multivariate analysis showed that assemblages differed between the two datasets. The majority of sampled species were common to both datasets but several species were exclusive to only one dataset. For some species, relative abundances were similar between the two datasets, while for others, there were notable differences without directional uniformity. Spot (Leiostomus xanthurus) and northern pipefish (Syngnathus fuscus) were considerably less abundant in the contemporary dataset, while dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae) was more abundant. Observed changes in community structure may be more attributable to higher overall bay water temperature in recent years and other anthropogenic influences than to changes in seagrass coverage at our study sites.

Keywords

Fish community composition Seagrass Historical comparison Chesapeake Bay Climate change 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank many people for helping with field work, including Jacques van Montfrans, Ryan Norris, and many VIMS graduate students. David Wilcox provided GIS and seagrass change analysis assistance. We thank Wendy Lowery for compiling VIMS Juvenile Fish Trawl Survey data and for providing useful summaries. Ken Heck provided helpful insight and review and two reviewers provided additional constructive advice. Funding was provided in part by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission Recreational Fishing Advisory Board and the VIMS Hunter B. Andrews, Jr. Fellowship to K.L.S. This paper is contribution no. 3263 of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, The College of William & Mary.

Supplementary material

12237_2013_9586_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (106 kb)
Fig. X1 Seagrass coverage change analysis showing 1978 (historical, red) and 2010 (contemporary, green) data layers. Areas of seagrass coverage that are common to both are shown in yellow. (PDF 106 kb)

References

  1. Austin, H.M. 2002. Decadal oscillations and regime shifts, characterization of the Chesapeake Bay marine climate. In Fisheries in a changing climate, ed. N.A. McGinn, 155–170. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 32.Google Scholar
  2. Baden, S.P., A. Emanuelsson, L. Pihl, C.J. Svensson and P. Åberg. 2012. Shift in seagrass food web structure over decades linked to overfishing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 451: 61–73.Google Scholar
  3. Benfield, M.C., and T.J. Minello. 1996. Relative effects of turbidity and light intensity on reactive distance and feeding of an estuarine fish. Environmental Biology of Fishes 46: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonzek, C.F., J. Gartland, and R. J. Latour. 2011. Data collection and analysis in support of single and multispecies stock assessments in Chesapeake Bay: The Chesapeake Bay Multispecies Monitoring and Assessment Program (ChesMMAP). Project # F-130-R-6. Annual Progress Report to the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA. 160 pages.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd ed. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, K.R., and R.N. Gorley. 2006. PRIMER v6: User manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
  7. Douglass, J.G., K.E. France, J.P. Richardson, and J.E. Duffy. 2010. Seasonal and interannual change in a Chesapeake Bay eelgrass community: insights into biotic and abiotic control of community structure. Limnology and Oceanography 55: 1499–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fodrie, F.J., K.L. Heck Jr., S.P. Powers, W.M. Graham, and K.L. Robinson. 2010. Climate-related, decadal-scale assemblage changes in seagrass-associated fishes in northern Gulf of Mexico. Global Change Biology 16: 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fredette, T.J., R.J. Diaz, J. van Montfrans, and R.J. Orth. 1990. Secondary production within a seagrass bed (Zostera marina and Ruppia maritima) in lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 13: 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallegos, C.L., P.J. Werdell, and C.R. McClain. 2011. Long–term changes in light scattering in Chesapeake Bay inferred from Secchi depth, light attenuation, and remote sensing measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research 116: C00H08. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillanders, B.M. 2006. Seagrasses, Fish, and Fisheries. In Seagrasses: biology, ecology, and conservation, ed. A.W.D. Larkum, R.J. Orth, and C.M. Duarte, 503–536. Amsterdam: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gotelli, N.J., and R.K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare, J.A., and K.W. Able. 2007. Mechanistic links between climate and fisheries along the east coast of the United States: explaining population outbursts of Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus). Fisheries Oceanography 16: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hare, J.A., M.A. Alexander, M.J. Fogarty, E.H. Williams, and J.D. Scott. 2010. Forecasting the dynamics of a coastal fishery species using a coupled climate-population model. Ecological Applications 20: 452–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayse, J.W. 1990. Feeding habits, age, growth, and reproduction of Atlantic spadefish Chaetodipterus faber (Pisces: Ephippidae) in South Carolina. Fishery Bulletin 88: 67–83.Google Scholar
  16. Heck Jr., K.L., and T.A. Thoman. 1984. The nursery role of seagrass meadows in the upper and lower reaches of the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 7: 70–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heck Jr., K.L., G. Hays, and R.J. Orth. 2003. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253: 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heck Jr., K.L., T.J. Carruthers, C.M. Duarte, A.R. Hughes, G.A. Kendrick, R.J. Orth, and S.L. Williams. 2008. Trophic transfers from seagrass meadows subsidize diverse marine and terrestrial consumers. Ecosystems 11: 1198–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horodysky, A.Z., R.W. Brill, E.J. Warrant, J.A. Musick, and R.J. Latour. 2008. Comparative visual function in five sciaenid fishes inhabiting Chesapeake Bay. The Journal of Experimental Biology 211: 3601–3612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houde, E.D. 1987. Fish early life history dynamics and recruitment variability. American Fisheries Society Symposium 2: 17–29.Google Scholar
  21. Keller, A., and G. Klein-MacPhee. 2000. Impact of elevated temperature on the growth, survival and trophic dynamics of winter flounder larvae: a mesocosm study. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 2382–2392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kordas, R.L., C.D.G. Harley, and M.I. O’Connor. 2011. Community ecology in a warming world: the influence of temperature on interspecific interactions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 400: 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraus, R.T., and D.H. Secor. 2005. Application of the nursery role hypothesis to an estuarine fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 291: 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Limpert, E., W.A. Stahel, and M. Abbt. 2001. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. BioScience 51: 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maunder, M.N., and A.E. Punt. 2004. Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fisheries Research 70: 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mattila, J., G. Chaplin, M.R. Eilers, K.L. Heck, J.P. O’Neal, and J.F. Valentine. 1999. Spatial and diurnal distribution of invertebrate and fish fauna of a Zostera marina bed and nearby unvegetated sediments in Damariscotta River, Maine (USA). Journal of Sea Research 41: 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCullagh, P., and J.A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Moore, K.A., D.J. Wilcox, and R.J. Orth. 2000. Analysis of abundance of submersed aquatic vegetation communities in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 23: 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore, K.A., and J.C. Jarvis. 2008. Environmental factors affecting recent summertime eelgrass diebacks in the lower Chesapeake Bay: implications for long-term persistence. Journal of Coastal Research 55: 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore, K.A., R.J. Orth, and D.J. Wilcox. 2009. Assessment of the abundance of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) communities in the Chesapeake Bay and its use in SAV management. In Remote sensing and geographic information systems for coastal ecosystem assessment and management: Principles and applications, ed. Xiaojun Yang, 233–257. Germany: Springer-Verlag GMBH. 561 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Najjar, R.G., C.R. Pyke, M.B. Adams, D. Breitburg, C. Hershner, M. Kemp, R. Howarth, M.R. Mulholland, M. Paolisso, D. Secor, K. Sellner, D. Wardrop, and R. Wood. 2010. Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 86: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NOAA Fisheries. 2012. Annual Commercial Landing Statistics. NOAA Office of Science and Technology, Commercial Fishery Landings, http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/commercial/index.html. Accessed October 22, 2012.
  33. Norcross, B.L., and H.M. Austin. 1981. Climate scale environmental factors affecting year class fluctuations of Chesapeake Bay croaker Micropogonias undulatus. Gloucester Point: Virginia Institute of Marine Science. Special Scientific Report No. 110. 78 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC). 2008. Assessment of 19 Northeast Groundfish Stocks through 2007: Report of the 3rd Groundfish Assessment Review Meeting (GARM III), Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, August 4–8, 2008. US Dep. Commerce, NOAA Fisheries, Northeast Fish Sci. Cent. Ref Doc. 08–15; 884 p + xvii.Google Scholar
  35. Nye, J.A., J.S. Link, J.A. Hare, and W.J. Overholtz. 2009. Changing spatial distribution of fish stocks in relation to climate and population size on the Northeast United States continental shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series 393: 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Connor, M.I., M.F. Piehler, D.M. Leech, A. Anton, and J.F. Bruno. 2009. Warming and resource availability shift food web structure and metabolism. PLoS Biology 7(8): e1000178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Orth, R.J. 1977. The importance of sediment stability in seagrass communities. In Ecology of marine benthos, ed. B.C. Coull, 281–300. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  38. Orth, R.J., and K.L. Heck Jr. 1980. Structural components of eelgrass meadows in the lower Chesapeake Bay—Fishes. Estuaries 3: 278–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Orth, R.J., K.L. Heck, and J. van Montfrans. 1984. Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator–prey relationships. Estuaries 7: 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orth, R. J. and K. A. Moore. 1988. Submerged aquatic vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay: a barometer of bay health. pp. 619–629. In: M. Lynch (Ed.), Understanding the estuary: Advances in Chesapeake Bay research. Chesapeake Res. Consort. Pub. No. 129. CBP/TRS/24/88.Google Scholar
  41. Orth, R.J., T.J.B. Carruthers, W.C. Dennison, C.M. Duarte, J.W. Fourqurean, K.L. Heck Jr., A.R. Hughes, G.A. Kendrick, W.J. Kenworthy, S. Olyarnik, F.T. Short, M. Waycott, and S.L. Williams. 2006. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56: 987–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Orth, R.J., S.R. Marion, K.A. Moore, and D.J. Wilcox. 2010. Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in the Chesapeake Bay Region of Mid-Atlantic Coast of the USA: challenges in conservation and restoration. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Orth, R.J., D.J. Wilcox, J.R. Whiting, L. Nagey, A.L. Owens, and A.K. Kenne. 2011. 2010 Distribution of submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay and coastal bays. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Special Scientific Report #153.Google Scholar
  44. Paine, David P. 1981. Aerial photography and image interpretation for resource management. New York: Wiley. 571 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Pereira, J.J., R. Goldberg, J.J. Ziskowski, P.L. Berrien, W. W. Morse, and D.L. Johnson. 1999. Essential fish habitat source document: Winter Flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, Life History and Habitat Characteristics. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-138. 39 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Pihl, L., S. Baden, N. Kautsky, P. Rönnbäck, T. Söderqvist, M. Troell, and H. Wennhage. 2006. Shift in fish assemblage structure due to loss of seagrass Zostera marina habitats in Sweden. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 67: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pörtner, H.O. 2010. Oxygen and capacity limitation of thermal tolerance: a matrix for integrating climate related stressors in marine ecosystems. Journal of Experimental Biology 213: 881–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/.
  49. Reber, C.M., and W.A. Bennett. 2007. The influence of thermal parameters on the acclimation responses of pinfish Lagodon rhomboides exposed to static and decreasing low temperatures. Journal of Fish Biology 71: 833–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teixeira, R.L., and J.A. Musick. 1995. Trophic ecology of two congeneric pipefishes (Syngnathidae) of the lower York River, Virginia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 43: 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tuckey, T.D. and M.C. Fabrizio. 2011. Estimating relative juvenile abundance of ecologically important finfish in the Virginia portion of Chesapeake Bay. Project # F-104-R-15. Annual report to the Virginia Marine Resources Commission. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, VA. 95 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Venables, W., and C. Dichmont. 2004. GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research. Fisheries Research 70: 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Montfrans, J., R.L. Wetzel, and R.J. Orth. 1984. Epiphyte-grazer relationships in seagrass meadows: consequences for seagrass growth and production. Estuaries 7: 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walther, G.-R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T.J.C. Beebee, J.-M. Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, and F. Bairlein. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waycott, M., C.M. Duarte, T.J.B. Carruthers, R.J. Orth, W.C. Dennison, S. Olyamik, A. Calladine, J.W. Fourqurean, K.L. Heck Jr., A.R. Hughes, G.A. Kendrick, W.J. Kenworthy, F.T. Short, and S.L. Williams. 2009. Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 12377–12381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wingate, R.L., and D.H. Secor. 2008. The effects of winter temperature and flow on a summer-fall nursery fish assemblage in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137: 1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wood, R.T., D.F. Boesch, and V.S. Kennedy. 2002. Future consequences of climate change for the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem and its fisheries. In Fisheries in a changing climate, ed. N.A. McGinn, 171–183. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 32.Google Scholar
  58. Woodward, J.R. 2009. Investigating the relationships between recruitment indices and estimates of adult abundance for striped bass, weakfish, and Atlantic croaker. MS Thesis. Virginia Institute of Marine Science.Google Scholar
  59. Zuur, A.F., E.N. Ieno, N. Walker, A.A. Saveliev, and G.M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York: Springer. 574 pages.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn L. Sobocinski
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert J. Orth
    • 1
  • Mary C. Fabrizio
    • 1
  • Robert J. Latour
    • 1
  1. 1.Virginia Institute of Marine ScienceCollege of William & MaryGloucester PointUSA

Personalised recommendations