Non-monotonic Responses of Phytoplankton Biomass Accumulation to Hydrologic Variability: A Comparison of Two Coastal Plain North Carolina Estuaries
- 460 Downloads
Freshwater inputs often play a more direct role in estuarine phytoplankton biomass (chlorophyll a) accumulation than nitrogen (N) inputs, since discharge simultaneously controls both phytoplankton residence time and N loading. Understanding this link is critical, given potential changes in climate and human activities that may affect discharge and watershed N supply. Chlorophyll a (chla) relationships with hydrologic variability were examined in 3-year time series from two neighboring, shallow (<5 m), microtidal estuaries (New and Neuse River estuaries, NC, USA) influenced by the same climatic conditions and events. Under conditions ranging from drought to floods, N concentration and salinity showed direct positive and negative responses, respectively, to discharge for both estuaries. The response of chla to discharge was more complex, but was elucidated through conversion of discharge to freshwater flushing time, an estimate of transport time scale. Non-linear fits of chla to flushing time revealed non-monotonic, unimodal relationships that reflected the changing balance between intrinsic growth and losses through time and along the axis of each estuary. Maximum biomass occurred at approximately 10-day flushing times for both systems. Residual analysis of the fitted data revealed positive relationships between chla and temperature, suggesting enhanced growth rates at higher temperatures. N loading and system-wide, volume-weighted chla were positively correlated, and biomass yields per N load were greater than other marine systems. When combined with information on loss processes, these results on the hydrologic control of phytoplankton biomass will help formulate mechanistic models necessary to predict ecosystem responses to future climate and anthropogenic changes.
KeywordsEstuary Flushing time Phytoplankton Nitrogen Neuse River New River
We are grateful to the many students and technicians who have helped with field sampling and laboratory analyses, especially B. Abare, J. Braddy, M. Hoffman, A. Joyner, L. Kelly, K. Rossignol, and R. Sloup. R. Guajardo provided invaluable assistance with volume calculations using GIS. We appreciate the critical and constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers. Funding for this project was provided by Strategic Environmental Research and Developmental Program (SERDP)-Defense Coastal/Estuarine Research Program Project SI-1413, the Lower Neuse Basin Association, the Neuse River Compliance Association, and National Science Foundation Projects OCE 0825466, OCE 0812913, and CBET 0932632. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the policies or opinions of the US Department of Defense or associated military services.
- Arar, E.J., W.L. Budde, and T.D. Behymer. 1997. Methods for the determination of chemical substances in marine and environmental matrices. EPA/600/R-97/072. Cincinnati: National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- Bricker, S.B., C.G. Clement, D.E. Pirhalla, S.P. Orlando, and D.R.G. Farrow. 1999. National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment: Effects of nutrient enrichment in the Nation’s estuaries. Silver Spring: NOAA, National Ocean Service, Special Projects Office and the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science.Google Scholar
- Hall, N.S., H.W. Paerl, K.L. Rossignol, and B.L. Peierls. 2012. Effects of climatic variability on phytoplankton biomass and community structure in the eutrophic, microtidal, New River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science (in revision).Google Scholar
- Luettich, R.A., Jr., J.E. McNinch, H.W. Paerl, C.H. Peterson, J.T. Wells, M. Alperin, C.S. Martens, and J.L. Pinckney. 2000. Neuse River Estuary modeling and monitoring project stage 1: Hydrography and circulation, water column nutrients and productivity, sedimentary processes and benthic-pelagic coupling, and benthic ecology. Water Resources Research Institute Report No. 325-B. Raleigh: Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
- National Climatic Data Center. 2010. State of the Climate National Overview, September 2010. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2010/9#SERCC. Accessed 20 October 2011.
- Nixon, S.W. 1992. Quantifying the relationship between nitrogen input and the productivity of marine ecosystems. In Proceedings of advanced marine technology conference, Vol. 5, eds. M. Takahashi, K. Nakata, and T.R. Parsons, 57–83. Tokyo.Google Scholar
- Paerl, H.W., R.R. Christian, J.D. Bales, B.L. Peierls, N.S. Hall, A.R. Joyner, and S.R. Riggs. 2010. Assessing the response of the Pamlico Sound, North Carolina, USA to human and climatic disturbances: Management implications. In Coastal lagoons: Critical habitats of environmental change, ed. M. Kennish and H. Paerl, 17–42. Boca Raton: CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pinckney, J.L., D.F. Millie, B.T. Vinyard, and H.W. Paerl. 1997. Environmental controls of phytoplankton bloom dynamics in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2491–2501.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Tomas, C.R., J. Peterson, and A.O. Tatters. 2007. Harmful algal species from Wilson Bay, New River, North Carolina: Composition, nutrient bioassay and HPLC pigment analysis. UNC-WRRI-369. , Raleigh: Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina.Google Scholar